Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
St Mary's Church of England Primary School, Hinckley
Summary
Jackie Stirland (lead), Dorothy Stenson, Jane Moore
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
11 Dec 2019
- Inspectors verified
Dorothy Stenson, Jackie Stirland, Jane Moore
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
LE10 1AW
- Name on report verified
St Mary’s Church of England Primary School, Hinckley
- URN verified
120134
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- They are not as well prepared for secondary school as they should be in too many subjects. p.2
- Teachers are not clear about what pupils need to know and remember. p.2
- Senior leaders must ensure that subject leaders are properly equipped to improve their subjects. p.4
- However, pupils do not achieve as well as they should by the time they leave the school. p.2
- They do not outline what pupils should learn, and 10–11 December 2019 p.2
- Senior leaders and governors need to have much better oversight of how and when subject leaders monitor their areas of responsibility. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance15
“Subject leaders are enthusiastic.” p.2Teaching & assessment8
“Teachers are not clear about what pupils need to know and remember.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,121
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Plain English
- Flesch 62, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 12 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of St Mary’s Church of England Primary School, Hinckley Station Road, Hinckley, Leicestershire LE10 1AW
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Good Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement 10–11 December 2019
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils say they enjoy coming to school. They attend regularly. They like the vibrant classrooms and welcoming atmosphere. They feel safe and cared for. Staff know their pupils well and relationships are strong.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils behave well. Respect towards each other is evident and ever-present. Good behaviour is rewarded, and playtimes are calm and happy. There are few recorded incidents of bullying. Pupils are adamant that if bullying happens, it is dealt with quickly and effectively.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are keen to learn and are ready for new challenges. They are taught how to be resilient and to keep trying. However, pupils do not achieve as well as they should by the time they leave the school. Sometimes, the work they are set is not challenging enough. Teachers do not plan lessons that help pupils to build on their previous learning. There are gaps in what pupils know and remember. They are not as well prepared for secondary school as they should be in too many subjects.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils enjoy and appreciate the range of extra activities they can do. The residential trip is a high point for many. Pupils value the responsibilities they are given and take these roles seriously.
p.2
better?
Senior leaders and governors regularly check progress towards the school’s priorities. They know what improvements are needed. They are considerate of staff welfare and workload. Governors are getting better at challenging school leaders. However, the speed of improvement since the last inspection has not been fast enough.
p.2
better?
In recent years, pupils have not achieved well enough in reading, writing and mathematics. Leaders have made improvements to these subjects. For example, early reading skills are now taught in a well-planned sequence. The benefits of this work can be seen in the early years and key stage 1, but not yet in key stage 2. Typically, writing is much stronger than other subjects across the school.
p.2
better?
The religious education (RE) curriculum is well planned. Leaders have ensured that teachers know what to teach and when. Subjects such as geography and history are not well planned. There is not enough focus on increasing pupils’ knowledge over time. Teachers are not clear about what pupils need to know and remember. There are too many gaps in pupils’ knowledge, so they cannot build on what they already know.
p.2
better?
Subject leaders are enthusiastic. They have received training to help them with their roles. They are given time to check their subject in different year groups. However, they are not clear enough about how to check the quality of their subject. Often the plans for subjects are vague. They do not outline what pupils should learn, and 10–11 December 2019
p.2
3
when. Subject leaders do not know enough about how well pupils are doing in their subjects.
p.3
3
Reading is now a school priority. Pupils usually read books that match their ability. They enjoy selecting books from the school library. Their understanding of how texts are written is improving. Pupils use their phonics skills accurately to help build new and unfamiliar words. Older pupils are increasing in fluency and accuracy. Focused daily teaching and reading practice is helping with this.
p.3
3
Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are encouraged to always try their best. They are supported well with their learning in lessons. Reviews of the pupils’ needs are regular and timely. The leader for SEND works closely with parents, carers and external agencies. Interventions and support are well matched to the pupils’ needs.
p.3
3
Key staff work hard to support pupils and families, and this is visible in pupils’ improved attendance. The self-confidence and self-esteem of many disadvantaged pupils has improved and makes them want to come to school.
p.3
3
Staff nurture children’s love of school from the day they start in the early years. Children learn in an engaging, stimulating, organised environment. The curriculum is sequenced and well planned. It prioritises children’s vocabulary and early reading. Children immediately start to learn sight vocabulary as well as phonics. They are keen to read. Teachers encourage parents to support their children with reading and phonics. Teachers are quick to identify where learning gaps exist. They build on what children already know and can do. They plan well for children’s physical development and link this to other learning. For example, children make a ‘dinosaur book’ and respond to a personal letter by writing a list of food for a dinosaur party.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Staff receive regular safeguarding training and know what to do when a pupil may be at risk. Systems for looking after pupils are rigorous. Leaders work well with parents and other agencies so that pupils get the help they need.
p.3
Safeguarding
All pre-employment checks are made on staff, in line with statutory guidance. Leaders update governors on safeguarding matters.
p.3
Safeguarding
Pupils know how to keep themselves safe in different situations. They know who to go to if they are worried about something. ‘Lunch club’ is a safe space for pupils to talk about how they are feeling and is used well. 10–11 December 2019
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Leaders have begun to revise the curriculum but, in subjects other than reading, writing and RE, this has not been effective. There is too much focus on developing skills without consideration of the knowledge that is necessary to underpin those skills. Leaders need to make sure that teachers are clear about what knowledge pupils need to learn and when, in all subjects. They also need to ensure that subject leaders and teachers are confident in the knowledge they need to teach these subjects. Senior and subject leaders are unclear about what is happening in some subjects. They are not sufficiently aware of the content or quality of learning in areas for which they are responsible. Senior leaders and governors need to have much better oversight of how and when subject leaders monitor their areas of responsibility. Senior leaders must ensure that subject leaders are properly equipped to improve their subjects. Senior leaders should hold subject leaders to
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you’re not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 10–11 December 2019
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10110040 Type of school Primary
p.5
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 8–9 June 2017
p.5
Information about this school
This is a Church of England voluntary controlled primary school. The school received its section 48 inspection in November 2019, when this aspect of the school’s work was graded as good.
p.5
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
During the inspection, we met with the headteacher, deputy headteacher, subject leaders, the leader for the provision for pupils with SEND, and the leader for the early years. The lead inspector met with governors and looked at records of meetings of the governing body. The lead inspector also met the school improvement adviser from the local authority. Reading, writing, mathematics, RE, history, geography and French were considered as part of this inspection. Inspection activities included discussions with subject leaders, visits to lessons and looking at pupils’ work. We talked with pupils and staff about learning. Leaders accompanied us for most of the inspection activities. The lead inspector met with the designated leaders for safeguarding to check that 10–11 December 2019
p.5
6
safeguarding procedures and processes were effective. Discussions about safeguarding with pupils, staff and leaders took place. The lead inspector met with the leader for attendance and checked information about behaviour and attendance. We scrutinised the record of checks made on staff before employment. We reviewed other safeguarding records. We observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons, at playtimes and at other times around the school. We reviewed a range of documentation, including leaders’ improvement plans. There were 60 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View. There were 27 responses to the staff survey and 23 responses to the pupil survey. We considered the views shared in these responses.
p.6
Inspection team
Jackie Stirland, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Jane Moore Ofsted Inspector 10–11 December 2019
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion