Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Woking High School

Inspected 4 Dec 2019 · published 17 Jan 2020 · URN 139993

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Mark Bagust (lead), Peter Fry, Steve Baker

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    4 Dec 2019

  • Inspectors verified

    Mark Bagust, Peter Fry, Steve Baker

  • Postcode verified

    GU21 4TJ

  • Name on report verified

    Woking High School

  • URN verified

    139993

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+52Positivemore positive than 53% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisevery wellstrongambitiousexcellentenjoyfeel safehigh expectationspositive
Criticismconcernspoorat riskseriousnot alwaysconcerndeclining

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1040w+61
  • Safeguarding107w−15

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,145
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 59, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
4
typical 4
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%Safeguarding 6%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Woking High School Morton Road, Horsell, Woking, Surrey GU21 4TJ

p.1

Outcome

Woking High School continues to be a good school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy coming to school and they are very proud of it. They get on very well with each other and with staff. Pupils say that the school feels like a family. Parents, carers and pupils praise the very high quality of pastoral care that the school provides. Pupils feel safe and well cared for. There is always somebody in the school they can talk to if they have a problem.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Most pupils benefit from high standards of teaching. They appreciate the help that staff give them. Year 11 pupils doing their mock examinations told us that they feel staff are ‘rooting for them to do well’.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils behave very well in lessons. They work diligently and independently. Inspectors saw a high standard of work in a variety of lessons. Around the school, the atmosphere is relaxed and friendly. Pupils say that bullying and incidents of poor behaviour are rare.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Many pupils take advantage of the extensive range of clubs and activities provided outside of their regular lessons. Pupils have numerous opportunities to have their say in how the school is run. For example, they have improved the school environment by reducing the use of plastics.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The curriculum is ambitious and well designed, with strong academic and vocational elements. Most curriculum leaders have carefully considered what pupils should learn and the order in which things are taught. In science, for example, pupils understand the big ideas because they learn how different concepts in the subject are connected. In some topics in a small number of subjects, pupils are sometimes left with misconceptions because the curriculum is less well organised than in other subjects.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

All pupils study the full national curriculum for three years in key stage 3. At key stage 4, the curriculum contains a broad range of appropriate subjects and pupils have a free 3–4 December 2019

p.1

2

choice of option subjects. Pupils enjoy many visits and other activities that relate to what they have been learning. The ‘day 11 timetable’ allows all pupils to take part regularly in activities that broaden their horizons. In addition, large numbers of pupils take part in a wide range of clubs. These include sport and music, as well as opportunities for pupils to develop leadership and communication skills.

p.2

2

Teachers have good subject knowledge. They present information in clear and interesting ways. They use questions to probe how well pupils have understood and check their understanding before moving on. Pupils cope well with demanding work because it is well planned and taught. Teaching and assessment approaches help pupils to remember important ideas and information.

p.2

2

Most pupils achieve very well and results in public examinations are above the national averages. Leaders’ recent work to raise the aspirations and achievement of disadvantaged pupils has been very successful. These pupils did much better in their examinations last year.

p.2

2

Leaders recognise that pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) do not always achieve as well as they could. Staff need more training on how to adapt their teaching so that pupils with SEND achieve their very best. Leaders are clear about what they need to do. They are beginning to check more carefully that extra support for these pupils is helping their learning. However, pupils with visual impairment achieve well and play a full part in school life because of the excellent support they receive.

p.2

2

Staff have high expectations of pupils’ behaviour. They establish clear routines and boundaries. These go hand in hand with well-planned teaching and, all together, they mean that pupils behave well in class.

p.2

2

The school is very well led. Leaders do not rest on their laurels and are constantly striving to improve the school further. The whole school community, including governors, shares leaders’ ambitious vision. Staff are overwhelmingly positive about leaders’ concern for their workload and well-being. Staff say that the changes made to standardise assessment have made a positive difference.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.2

Safeguarding

All staff share in the responsibility for ensuring that pupils are kept safe. Governors and leaders set the tone that ‘it could happen here’. There is a large well-trained safeguarding team that works well together to support pupils at risk.

p.2

Safeguarding

Leaders regularly update staff on local safeguarding issues. Staff at all levels know what to do if they have concerns about pupils. The designated safeguarding lead keeps meticulous records.

p.2

Safeguarding

Parents say that their children feel safe at school. Pupils know who to go to if they need help and feel confident that their concerns will be dealt with. 3–4 December 2019

p.2

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Leaders know that there is more to do to make sure that pupils with SEND achieve as well as others. In particular, they need to make sure that staff have the knowledge and skills needed to adapt their teaching successfully to meet the needs of these pupils. Leaders need to check more rigorously that these pupils are achieving well in lessons and that interventions are having the desired impact.  Leaders have made considerable inroads into developing the curriculum. However, in some topics within a small number of subjects, pupils’ learning is not sequenced as coherently as it is in other subjects. Leaders should ensure that all subject leaders have strong expertise so that plans are consistently strong.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called a section 8 inspection of a good school or non-exempt outstanding school. We do not give graded judgements on a section 8 inspection. However, if we find some evidence that the school could now be better than good or that standards may be declining, then the next inspection will be a section 5 inspection. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the section 8 inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will convert the section 8 inspection to a section 5 inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the first section 8 inspection since we judged the school to be good on 10–11 February 2016.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school. 3–4 December 2019

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 3–4 December 2019

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10111241 Type of school Secondary comprehensive

p.5

School details

Number of pupils on the school roll 1,196

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 10–11 February 2016

p.5

Information about this school

 The school has a specially resourced provision for up to 10 pupils with visual impairment. Currently, eight pupils use this provision.  The school uses the following alternative providers to support pupils with their vocational learning and well-being: Merrist Wood College, Gasp Motor Project, SOS online learning, Bike Project (City and Guilds Charity) and A2E (Access to Education). Pupils who attend these provisions do so on a part-time basis.  The school suspends the timetable for one day each half-term to provide all pupils with the opportunity to take part in educational visits and enrichment activities. This is known as the ‘day 11 timetable’.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 We held meetings with the headteacher and other leaders. We also met with a range of teaching and support staff.  We did deep dives in the following subjects: English, science, modern foreign languages, geography and design and technology. We discussed curriculum design with leaders, carried out lesson visits, scrutinised pupils’ work and spoke to pupils and 3–4 December 2019

p.5

6

teachers from the lessons visited about the curriculum.  We evaluated the effectiveness of safeguarding. The school’s single central record was reviewed. We met with the designated safeguarding lead and pastoral staff.  I met with four governors, including the chair of the governing body.  We considered the views of 91 members of staff who responded to Ofsted’s online staff survey, 95 responses to the Ofsted Parent View survey and the 85 free-text responses. We met with groups of pupils to discuss their views about the school and talked to pupils informally about the school. We took account of the 268 responses to Ofsted’s online pupils’ survey.

p.6

Inspection team

Mark Bagust, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Peter Fry Ofsted Inspector 3–4 December 2019

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion