Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Howbridge Church of England Junior School
Summary
Al Mistrano (lead), Brenda Watson, David Piercy
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
11 Dec 2019
- Inspectors verified
Al Mistrano, Brenda Watson, David Piercy
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
CM8 1BZ
- Name on report verified
Howbridge Church of England Junior School
- URN verified
140666
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Staff contribute positively to the well-planned weekly cycle of activities that successfully link to pupils’ spiritual, moral, cultural and social development. p.3
- The new leadership team has introduced training for staff to ensure that the curriculum and the quality of teaching match leaders’ high expectations. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- In particular, pupils do not achieve as well as they could in reading and mathematics because teaching is not as effective as it should be. p.2
- Curriculum leaders have not completely clarified the key knowledge and understanding that pupils must know. p.3
- Leaders must make clear to teachers what must be taught, including the meaning and correct spelling of the key words 10–11 December 2019 p.3
- The new senior leadership team know what needs to improve at the school. p.2
- This is because curriculum leaders have not completely clarified what teachers should teach. p.2
- Teachers need to provide activities that meet the needs of all pupils. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,066
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 56, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 16%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Howbridge Church of England Junior School Howbridge Road, Witham, Essex CM8 1BZ
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement 10–11 December 2019
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Parents, pupils and staff say that the school has improved a great deal recently. Inspectors saw many signs of improvement. Nonetheless, further improvements are needed. The new leadership team has introduced training for staff to ensure that the curriculum and the quality of teaching match leaders’ high expectations. Teaching, however, does not fully and consistently meet the needs of all pupils. In particular, pupils do not achieve as well as they could in reading and mathematics because teaching is not as effective as it should be.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils enjoy school. Staff model the well-established school values. Pupils understand and live up to them. Inspectors saw many examples of the responsible and compassionate behaviour staff expect of pupils. In lessons, pupils try hard and have fun learning. They are keen to do well. Pupils behave sensibly and are kind towards each other during breaktimes.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils told inspectors that they feel safe at school. Parents agree. Bullying is rare, and staff deal with it well so that it stops. Pupils value other people’s differences. Racist and homophobic language is rare and well managed by staff.
p.2
better?
The new senior leadership team know what needs to improve at the school. In September 2019, leaders started to improve the curriculum. Following recent training, new curriculum leaders are making necessary improvements. There is still more to do. In some subjects, teachers do not always teach the spelling of subject- specific words. This is because curriculum leaders have not completely clarified what teachers should teach. Most subjects now have plans that outline in a logical order what pupils will learn. In some subjects, such as history and geography, teachers do not know well enough when to revisit what pupils know and can do. As a result, pupils do not always remember what they have learned.
p.2
better?
Curriculum leaders do not check the quality of teachers’ work with enough precision. Consequently, they do not always act swiftly enough when problems arise.
p.2
better?
Leaders are improving the teaching of reading. Pupils very much enjoy reading and understand its importance in their education. Teachers ensure that books match pupils’ abilities and interests. Most pupils read well. However, teachers do not have a coherent approach to supporting pupils who find reading difficult. These pupils do not learn how to read as well as they should.
p.2
better?
Teachers do not teach pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) consistently well. Teachers do not provide learning activities that meet their needs well enough. Extra provision outside of lessons for pupils with SEND does, however, help these pupils overcome some of the challenges they face. At times, the organisation of the extra provision interrupts lessons. This means that some pupils with SEND cannot always take part in the full curriculum. 10–11 December 2019
p.2
3
Leaders have created an impressive curriculum for personal development. Staff contribute positively to the well-planned weekly cycle of activities that successfully link to pupils’ spiritual, moral, cultural and social development. Leaders are committed to teaching pupils about healthy lifestyles. Leaders ensure that pupils have a wide range of enrichment activities, including clubs. Pupils can pursue their interests and talents during these times. Most pupils take part in an extra-curricular activity. The provision for sport is a strength of the school. Leaders are determined that all pupils take part in physical activity. In recognition of leaders’ success in promoting healthy lifestyles and physical activity, the school has been awarded Active School of the Year and the Healthy Schools award.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Pupils are safe and know how to stay safe. Teachers teach pupils how to stay safe in school, outside of school and when online. Leaders provide parents with information to help them keep their children safe from harm.
p.3
Safeguarding
Staff are well trained and look for signs of potential risks of harm. Adults respond appropriately and promptly when concerns arise. Records show that leaders work well with external agencies to help vulnerable pupils or families.
p.3
Safeguarding
Governors and trust leaders make sure that the school carries out the necessary checks on staff who work with pupils. The record of these checks is accurate and well maintained.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Teachers do not consistently meet the needs of pupils. This leads to some pupils not learning the curriculum as well as they could and falling behind. Teachers need to provide activities that meet the needs of all pupils. Some pupils with SEND receive extra support that interrupts the curriculum. As a result, some of these pupils do not take part in the full curriculum to which they are entitled. Teachers need to provide what pupils with SEND need so that they can learn the entire intended curriculum. Teachers do not systematically revisit important knowledge and skills that pupils have already learned. This leads to pupils forgetting key elements of the curriculum. Curriculum leaders need to clarify when teachers should revisit knowledge and skills within the curriculum. Teachers need to develop their understanding of the curriculum so that they can plan opportunities for pupils to revisit what they have learned and remember more.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Curriculum leaders have not completely clarified the key knowledge and understanding that pupils must know. Leaders must make clear to teachers what must be taught, including the meaning and correct spelling of the key words 10–11 December 2019
p.3
4
within the curriculum. Curriculum leaders have started working well with curriculum teams to make improvements. Curriculum leaders have not checked the quality of teaching well enough to make timely changes. They must evaluate more precisely to find what is working well and what needs to improve. They also need to use this information to make necessary changes before pupils’ learning is negatively affected.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you’re not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 10–11 December 2019
p.4
School details
Date of previous inspection 7–8 June 2017
p.5
Information about this school
The headteacher joined the school in September 2019. The school is part of the Diocese of Chelmsford Vine Schools Trust and has a religious character. Its previous section 48 inspection for schools of a religious character was December 2016. The report for this inspection is available on the school’s website.
p.5
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
We had discussions with the headteacher, members of the senior leadership team, special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) and curriculum leaders. We also had discussions with trust leaders and members of the local governing body. We spoke with parents, analysed 60 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, 33 text responses from parents and nine responses to the staff questionnaire. We spoke with teachers, including newly qualified teachers, support staff and pupils through the course of the inspection. 10–11 December 2019
p.5
6
We took account of a wide range of information, including the school’s website, development plans, information about pupils’ needs, leaders’ monitoring of quality of teaching and leaders’ records about pupils’ behaviour. Inspectors reviewed documentation regarding safeguarding. We visited lessons across the school and carried out scrutiny of pupils’ books. We started the inspection focusing on English, mathematics, history and geography. To answer questions raised on the first day of the inspection, we visited lessons in other subjects on the second day of the inspection.
p.6
Inspection team
Al Mistrano, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Brenda Watson Ofsted Inspector 10–11 December 2019
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion