Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Further education monitoring visit

Bishop Auckland College

Inspected 19 Dec 2019 · published 15 Jan 2020 · URN 130657

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Sarah Stabler

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    19 Dec 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Sarah Stabler

  • Postcode verified

    DL14 6JZ

  • Name on report verified

    Bishop Auckland College

  • URN verified

    130657

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−43Criticalmore positive than 20% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Criticismrequires improvement

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
27
shorter than usual (typical 36)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
9 words
Next steps
0
typical 0
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 2%About the inspection 98%

Full report text

Bishop Auckland College Report following a monitoring visit to a ‘requires improvement’ provider

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Sarah Stabler, HMI

p.1

Type of provider: General further education college

p.1

Address:

Woodhouse Lane Bishop Auckland County Durham DL14 6JZ Monitoring visit: Bishop Auckland College, 18–19 December 2019

p.1

Context and focus of visit

Bishop Auckland College was inspected in November and December 2018. At that time, inspectors judged the overall effectiveness of the provision to require improvement.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

The focus of this monitoring visit was to evaluate the progress that leaders and managers have made in addressing the main areas for improvement identified at the previous inspection.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

At the time of the monitoring visit, there were 600 learners on education programmes for young people, including 45 learners who have high needs. Most learners study vocational programmes; the largest curriculum area is early years, followed by visual arts, hair and beauty, and sport. There were 154 apprentices on programme, the large majority following framework apprenticeships at level 2 or 3. The monitoring visit did not cover adult learning programmes as they were graded good at the previous inspection.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers have successfully improved their approach to performance management. They carefully identify the staff who need to improve their practice and receive effective guidance from human resources colleagues to manage performance. As a result, staff improve their practice or leave the organisation.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Teaching, learning and assessment mentors conduct effective one-to-one coaching sessions with staff to address areas for improvement. The large majority of managers link departmental training well to the whole-college continuing professional development programme. As a result, staff have been supported well to improve their practice in areas such as providing effective feedback and the use of questioning to test learners’ understanding.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers formally schedule time for staff to develop their subject expertise. Tutors benefit from attendance at vocational conferences and awarding body events which enables them to network with colleagues from other organisations and share good practice. For example, English and mathematics staff collaborate weekly with colleagues and share expertise on lesson planning.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers source expert advice for mathematics staff to help improve the content of courses. They partner with neighbouring colleges to develop the approach to teaching GCSE mathematics. Tutors use this learning and their own analysis of learner success to sequence the delivery of topics appropriately. For Monitoring visit: Bishop Auckland College, 18–19 December 2019 example, they focus on number and measure early in the course to ensure that learners develop the fundamental knowledge that they need to carry out more advanced mathematical functions in readiness for the examination.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Managers carry out observations to evaluate the quality of teachers’ practice. However, feedback from a small minority of observations is not precise enough to help staff identify what they need to do to enhance their practice and improve the development of learners’ knowledge and skills.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Managers and tutors plan effective programmes to meet the needs of learners who have had previous poor experience of education or have significant barriers to learning. They carefully assess the knowledge, skills and behaviours that learners arrive with. They then use the results of the assessment to plan a programme of study with additional activities and pastoral support to meet learners’ needs successfully.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Tutors use their vocational expertise well to plan and sequence programmes. They ensure that underpinning knowledge is delivered early in the programme so that learners can build on what they know and can do. Tutors skilfully use recall activities to reinforce learning. They plan and deliver training activities that allow learners to apply their practical skills and reflect on knowledge gained from theory lessons. For example, in level 3 sport programmes, learners study health and safety first to enable them to risk assess activities that they conduct in coaching sessions.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Most tutors make effective use of assessment to identify gaps in learners’ knowledge. Tutors provide detailed explanations of what learners have done well and what they need to do to address gaps in their knowledge. As a result, learners understand their own areas for development and what they need to do to improve.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Managers and tutors have redesigned the content of the English and mathematics curriculum to take full account of learners’ starting points. For example, in mathematics, tutors successfully identify gaps in learners’ number skills. They have also introduced a qualification that helps learners to gain knowledge that improves their success with the early modules of GCSE programmes. However, tutors do not focus sufficiently on the continuing development of English and mathematics skills for learners who already have qualifications in these subjects.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Tutors do not assess well enough the progress that learners make from their starting points. They gather information about what learners know and can do but do not use this information effectively enough to plan activities to ensure that all learners are challenged to reach their full potential. Monitoring visit: Bishop Auckland College, 18–19 December 2019

p.3

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers work successfully with employers to identify elements of the qualification that best suit apprentices’ job roles. Apprentices develop their skills through well-coordinated on- and off-the-job training activities. Employers value the positive contribution that apprentices make to their business. For example, apprentices develop their confidence and skills in presenting and apply their skills effectively when conducting educational talks with customers at a local visitor attraction.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers accurately identify apprentices who may need additional support. They ensure that tutors work well with workplace supervisors to address concerns with apprentices who fall behind. Staff carry out effective review meetings early in the programme with apprentices and employers to check the suitability of the programme. Tutors successfully involve employers in assessment activities and regular progress reviews to keep them appraised of apprentices’ progress.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Tutors carefully assess apprentices’ understanding of vocational terminology through the use of knowledge-based assignments. They provide helpful feedback to apprentices that identifies gaps in their knowledge and what they need to do to improve. As a result, business and administration apprentices successfully develop their knowledge and understanding of business policy, procedure and practice.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Tutors encourage apprentices to improve their English, mathematics and information, communication and technology skills. They clearly identify where apprentices need to use their knowledge and skills in the workplace. For example, apprentices use their mathematics skills to calculate the cost of errors when quality assuring colleagues’ work.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Apprentices, many of whom are on frameworks, are not provided with specific feedback or learning goals other than those relating to the knowledge elements of the programme. Managers and tutors have recently evaluated and amended their approach to progress reviews and apprentice feedback to address this omission. However, it is too soon to measure the impact of their actions.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers collect anecdotal information about the progress that apprentices make in work after they complete their apprenticeship. However, this information is not drawn together well enough to enable managers to determine the appropriateness of the curriculum or measure the full impact of their programmes. Monitoring visit: Bishop Auckland College, 18–19 December 2019 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial tutor training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding

p.4

Reasonable progress

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Reasonable progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion