Social care · Children's services visit (ILACS)
Setting
Summary
Alison Smale (lead), Jan Edwards
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Alison Smale, Jan Edwards
- Postcode verified
BD1 1NN
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The rationale for decision-making is not always clearly recorded and is not always based on a sufficiently detailed outcome assessment. p.3
- The visit was the first monitoring visit since the local authority was judged inadequate in September 2018. p.1
- The service response has not made the necessary improvements identified at the last inspection and has not met the council’s own ambitions for these young people. p.2
- The response to young people who present as homeless is not good enough. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 1,519
- about usual (typical 1616)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 39, typical 39
- Average sentence
- 23 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 3
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 Textphone 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Ofsted is proud to use recycled paper 27 March 2019
p.1
Gladys Rhodes-White Interim Strategic Director Department of Children’s Services City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council, 1st Floor, Margaret McMillan Tower, Princes Way Bradford BD1 1NN
p.1
Monitoring visit of Bradford local authority children’s services
This letter summarises the findings of the monitoring visit to Bradford local authority children’s services on 6 March 2019. The visit was the first monitoring visit since the local authority was judged inadequate in September 2018. The inspectors were Jan Edwards, Her Majesty’s Inspector, and Alison Smale, Her Majesty’s Inspector.
p.1
Monitoring visit of Bradford local authority children’s services
The local authority is starting to make positive progress from a very low base in improving the services and response that children and families receive when requests for services are first made.
p.1
Areas covered by the visit
During this visit, inspectors reviewed the progress made in relation to the front door – the service that receives contacts and referrals – as well as the effectiveness of the manager oversight of the service, and the response to young people aged 16 to 17 when they present as homeless.
p.1
Areas covered by the visit
A range of evidence was considered during the visit, including: electronic case records, observation of contact advisers and the multi-agency safeguarding hub (MASH) social workers, performance management information, case file audits and other information provided by senior managers. In addition, inspectors spoke to a range of staff, including social workers, managers and other practitioners.
p.1
Overview
The local authority has started to make positive progress, from a low base, in improving its front door services. There is a more proportionate screening of contacts made to children’s social care. Consent is generally better understood and managed, although there remains variability in its application. Staff are embracing a new way of working, as opposed to what has been done traditionally.
p.2
Overview
The interim strategic director and her leadership team have swiftly reached a good understanding of the scale and depth of inadequacies in services for children and young people. In the three months since the strategic director has been in post, a MASH strategic board has been established to oversee and drive the improvement plan of the front door. This has very recently demonstrated improvements in some key areas of activity at the front door. The wider improvement plan addresses the areas of improvement identified at the last inspection, although it would benefit from a greater focus on outcomes for children and young people.
p.2
Overview
Young people aged 16 to 17 who present to the council for help and support because they are homeless do not receive a good service. The service response has not made the necessary improvements identified at the last inspection and has not met the council’s own ambitions for these young people.
p.2
Findings and evaluation of progress
Inspectors identified some practice areas that have made clear progress and other areas where improvements need further embedding.
p.2
Findings and evaluation of progress
The Children’s Initial Contact Point (CICP) is the first point of contact for all requests for a service. Contacts are screened promptly. The placement of a social worker in the CICP has strengthened the initial screening function and the earlier consideration of appropriate consent for a referral.
p.2
Findings and evaluation of progress
The majority of cases sampled in the MASH demonstrate that thresholds for an early help or social care service are being applied appropriately. While there has been considerable improvement to the level of screening undertaken, so that this is now proportionate to the level of risk and need, decision-making on some contacts continues to go beyond the expected timescale for screening.
p.2
Findings and evaluation of progress
The early help gateway has been co-located to the MASH and the process of a full integration with the service has been initiated. While this has yet to be achieved, staff report that they can already see the benefits of co-location in improved communication and manager oversight and that work is held at the right level. For example, cases of neglect and referrals made by anonymous persons, which, at the time of the previous inspection, were dealt with by early help, are now appropriately screened by the MASH. Early help triage is supported by an effective use of a chosen risk assessment methodology to determine the right service to meet the needs of the child and family. Contacts are appropriately sent to social care to be screened by the MASH when they are considered to require a social work service.
p.2
Findings and evaluation of progress
When concerns or risks are heightened, appropriate decisions are made to escalate cases to a social work assessment or a strategy meeting to consider whether child protection enquiries are required. Strategy meetings in the MASH are well attended, and include the necessary required minimum of professionals, which promotes appropriate decision-making. There are some delays in the completion of child protection enquiries due to basic checks and seeking of consent, even when this could have been dispensed with. The rationale for decision-making is not always clearly recorded and is not always based on a sufficiently detailed outcome assessment.
p.3
Findings and evaluation of progress
Interpreters are appropriately used for parents whose first language is not English, but this is not consistently the case for children, in particular very young verbal children. Inspectors found that children are seen and spoken to during child protection enquiries. There is little observation or analysis of their presentation, and while children’s views are sought in relation to their current circumstances, there is a missed opportunity to ascertain their wider lived experience. There is no evidence of social workers using direct work tools to aid communication. This means that senior leaders’ ambitions to improve the voice of the child being heard has not yet been realised in the early stages of the child protection process.
p.3
Findings and evaluation of progress
Safety planning agreed at strategy meetings identifies basic protective actions. However, there is an over-reliance on the parent to safeguard. This shows a missed opportunity to consider the role of other professionals and the families’ wider support networks in order to develop comprehensive safety plans.
p.3
Findings and evaluation of progress
The strategic director is uncompromising in challenging practice within social care and across the partnership when it falls below expected standards or where it has not been compliant with the principles of ‘Working Together, 2018’. This has resulted in social work managers having more confidence to reassert their lead role in child protection processes and in decision-making. Police partners in the MASH report that it has been the strength of the relationships in the multi-agency hub that has enabled them, after a problematic start, to embrace the cultural changes required to support the improvement plan.
p.3
Findings and evaluation of progress
Domestic abuse contacts are considered by experienced and knowledgeable social workers, which allows for insightful and sensitive handling of referrals where domestic abuse features. There is a timely response to domestic abuse incidents, supported through a daily risk assessment meeting to consider high-risk cases.
p.3
Findings and evaluation of progress
The response to young people who present as homeless is not good enough. There are delays in assessing the needs of these young people, and their right to become looked after is not explained or explored with them. The temporary accommodation arrangements offered are short term and not suitable, for example the use of bed and breakfast and adult hostels. This leads to further exposure to risk for these vulnerable young people.
p.3
Findings and evaluation of progress
Improved data is providing the right type of information for the local authority to be able to monitor service effectiveness and provide the basis for driving the improvements and forward planning. There is more to do to make performance information more intuitive to enable live data collection and assist managers in their daily management of the service.
p.4
Findings and evaluation of progress
Senior leaders understand the importance of having a robust programme of quality assurance. This is demonstrated through a broad programme of auditing and dip sampling activity of the front door that has been in operation since the last judgement inspection. There is more to do to develop the skill base of auditors and auditing practice. Leaders recognise that auditing is more meaningful for learning and understanding quality when it is carried out in conjunction with social workers and there is an intention to develop this. The regular use of moderation is good practice and provides additional checks and balances while a consistency of approach is achieved.
p.4
Findings and evaluation of progress
The extensive auditing programme of the front door has enabled the service to track the progress of developments in social work practice, clearly identifying in December 2018 that the improvement plan had not yet brought about the necessary change to ensure that children were safe. By February 2019, audits had identified that progress was now being made. Under the leadership of the strategic director, senior leaders understand the service well and are clear about what is still required to improve the quality and consistency of practice.
p.4
Findings and evaluation of progress
Council leaders are fully committed to supporting the necessary changes so that the children of Bradford receive good-quality services. There has been a significant financial investment, facilitating an uplift in social work salaries, retention payments, and an increase in the social work establishment. Social workers are being supported in their learning and development through a necessary ‘Bradford Basics’ programme and are fully engaged with and enthusiastic about the change programme following the judgement inspection.
p.4
Findings and evaluation of progress
I am copying this letter to the Department for Education.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion