Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Long Road Sixth Form College

Inspected 12 Dec 2019 · published 14 Jan 2020 · URN 130616

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Linnia Khemdoudi (lead), Philip Elliott, Sambit Sen

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    12 Dec 2019

  • Inspectors verified

    Linnia Khemdoudi, Philip Elliott, Sambit Sen

  • Name on report verified

    Short inspection of Long Road Sixth Form College

  • URN verified

    130616

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+56Positivemore positive than 55% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveeffectivelymake good progresssuccessfullywell behavedrespectfulfeel saferesilient
Criticismtoo lowlimitedbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionSafeguardingWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings560w+48
  • Safeguarding80w+58
  • What needs to improve98w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
735
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 48%Safeguarding 7%What needs to improve 8%About the inspection 37%

Full report text

Further education and skills inspection report

p.1

Short inspection of Long Road Sixth Form College

p.1

Outcome

Long Road Sixth Form College continues to be a good provider.

p.1

Information about this provider

Long Road Sixth Form College was previously inspected in January 2017. It is situated in the heart of Cambridge. It has one main site and approximately 2,250 students on 16-19 study programmes, including 21 students with additional learning and/or high needs and six adult students. The college does not have any subcontracted provision.

p.1

Information about this provider

The largest subject areas the college provides learning in are science and mathematics, social sciences, creative arts, and languages, literature and culture. The college offers a small number of vocational level 2 courses. Most courses offered are at level 3.

p.1

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Students develop their wider skills and knowledge through participating in a wide range of interesting and effective extra-curricular activities, including volunteering. For example, students who join the volunteering group articulate the benefits to themselves and the people they help:

p.1

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

‘The volunteering club is a great way to help others while meeting new people and forming new skills and knowledge. Most Tuesdays, a group of students visit a woman who lost her sight and now uses a guide dog. We may read out instructions and she will type what we say into her Braille machine. This is so she can use it later on.’

p.1

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Students learn what it is like to work in their chosen careers through participating in employer-led projects. Industry mentors help students to develop work-ready skills, such as team-working, time management, communication and high-level technical skills. 11–12 December 2019

p.1

better?

Teachers prepare students effectively to cope with higher-level study, an apprenticeship or employment. As a result, students are resilient and focused on achieving their goals. Students successfully move on to high-level apprenticeships, including in chemical or aerospace engineering and accountancy. Most students choose to study at university. They complete their courses and gain high-grade degrees.

p.2

better?

Teachers and learning assistants support students who have high needs very effectively. As a result, these students achieve at least as well as other students. Learning assistants help students to break down tasks into manageable chunks. For example, students learn how to better understand difficult theoretical concepts by using flashcards for revision. This helps them make good progress with their work.

p.2

better?

Progress coaches provide students with very good support. For example, they help students to improve the quality of their written work. As a result, students improve their confidence and develop appropriate professional behaviours. Students are well behaved and respectful to each other and staff.

p.2

better?

Most teachers provide good-quality and useful feedback. This ensures that students understand how to improve their work. Where this is most effective, students gain the high grades they aspire to. However, a significant minority of level 3 students studying geography and mathematics A levels do not achieve their target grades.

p.2

better?

Advanced-level students receive effective impartial careers advice and guidance. Leaders and teachers have developed good links with local employers. Students take part in relevant work placements, visits and talks with employers. This develops their understanding of the careers available to them within these organisations. However, students studying level 2 applied qualifications receive careers advice from their subject teachers. As a result, these students do not discuss career options outside of their main subject areas.

p.2

better?

The attendance of a significant minority of level 2 and GCSE mathematics students is too low. The attendance of these students remains significantly below that of higher-level students. Management strategies to improve attendance have had limited impact.

p.2

better?

Leaders and managers closely monitor the effectiveness of teaching and learning strategies. For example, managers frequently review the purpose and quality of assessment activities. They ensure that teachers use this information to help students remember more over time. For example, a teacher now teaches all three subject modules simultaneously. This helps students to link different aspects of the subject. As a result, they improve their understanding of the whole subject. 11–12 December 2019

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Students feel safe and are safe. Students know whom to report issues to should they arise.

p.3

Safeguarding

The safeguarding team are appropriately trained, for example in child criminal exploitation, suicide prevention training, lived experience of coercive control and mental health first aid.

p.3

Safeguarding

The designated safeguarding officer is well informed of local issues by attending the local police’s further education ‘Prevent’ forum. This forum highlights, for example, local activity by far right and animal rights groups.

p.3

What does the provider need to do to improve?

 Leaders and managers need to ensure that the attendance and punctuality of some level 2 students and those studying GCSE mathematics improve to the same high level as students on other programmes.  Leaders need to ensure that all students, particularly those studying level 2 applied courses, receive impartial and relevant careers advice from specialist staff to help them make informed choices about the full range of careers available to them.  Leaders need to ensure that students at all levels and subjects, such as GCSE English and mathematics, achieve their minimum target grades. 11–12 December 2019

p.3

Provider details

Address Long Road Cambridge Cambridgeshire CB2 8PX

p.4

Provider details

Date of previous inspection 24 January 2017

p.4

Provider details

Main subcontractors Not applicable 11–12 December 2019

p.4

Information about this inspection

The inspection was the first short inspection carried out since the college was judged to be good in January 2017.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspection team was assisted by the vice principal as nominee. Inspectors took account of the provider’s most recent self-assessment report and development plans, and the previous inspection report. The inspection was carried out using the further education and skills inspection handbook and took into account all relevant provision at the provider. Inspectors collected a wide range of evidence to inform judgements, including observing learning sessions, scrutinising learners’ work, seeking the views of learners, staff and other stakeholders, and examining the provider’s documentation and records.

p.5

Inspection team

Linnia Khemdoudi, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Sambit Sen Her Majesty’s Inspector Philip Elliott Ofsted Inspector 11–12 December 2019

p.5

6

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

6

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

6

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

6

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

6

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion