Summary
Jane Spilsbury (lead), Dave Gilkerson, Martin Spoor, Sara Arkle, Thomas Walton
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
6 Nov 2019
- Inspectors verified
Dave Gilkerson, Jane Spilsbury, Martin Spoor, Sara Arkle, Thomas Walton
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
WR11 1DQ
- Name on report verified
The De Montfort School
- URN verified
116932
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders and governors must ensure that they are fulfilling their statutory responsibilities for keeping pupils safe. p.4
- Leaders need to review the way they support and challenge families so that attendance improves quickly. p.4
- Leaders should ensure that pupils develop a deeper understanding in French or Spanish at key stage 3 to encourage more pupils to opt for modern foreign languages at GCSE. p.4
- Monitoring activities need to be strengthened to evaluate whether leaders’ work is having the intended impact on pupils’ learning and achievement. p.4
- Leaders and governors must ensure that the system and procedures in place to check and follow up on pupils’ attendance are robust, that health and safety risk assessments are carried out and that all providers have completed the necessary recruitment checks and provided training for their staff in safeguarding. p.4
- Leaders should ensure that their expectations in terms of behaviour are understood and consistently applied by all staff. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance19
“Leaders have high expectations of pupils’ behaviour.” p.2Teaching & assessment9
“Some teachers do not challenge poor behaviour.” p.2Progress & outcomes9
“In 2019, progress by the end of key stage 4 improved significantly.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,298
- about usual (typical 1552)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 54, typical 53
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 6
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of The De Montfort School Four Pools Road, Evesham, Worcestershire WR11 1DQ
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Good Leadership and management Inadequate Sixth-form provision Requires improvement Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement 5–6 November 2019
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The De Montfort School is welcoming and inclusive. Leaders have high expectations of pupils’ behaviour. Bullying happens rarely, but pupils know that if it does happen, staff will sort it out effectively. Pupils are usually polite and respectful and get along well together. Pupils’ movement around school is generally calm and orderly. However, some pupils can be boisterous around the school. Others do not always behave well in class. Staff do not always intervene to stamp this out.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are now starting to make much better progress in their learning than in previous years. In lessons, pupils often focus well. However, sometimes pupils lose concentration because they do not understand or they are not challenged enough by the work.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are fully involved in the community through fundraising work with the local Rotary Club. The school has adopted its road as part of a national litter-picking campaign. Pupils remember the sacrifices made by others in their annual ‘human poppy’ display. Parents and carers praise the staff highly for their support and care for pupils.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Sixth formers value the positive relationships with staff and the friendly, family feel of the sixth form. Sixth formers take on responsibilities across the school, for example reading with Year 6 pupils.
p.2
better?
Leaders have not maintained a strong enough oversight of the school. As a result, there are many areas of inconsistent practice. Behaviour is not managed consistently well by all staff. Some teachers do not challenge poor behaviour. Leaders have not ensured that all teachers have put into practice the training they have received. There is still too much variability in the impact of teaching and the examination results pupils achieve by the end of their time at the school.
p.2
better?
Pupils’ attendance has been below the national average for the last three years and shows little sign of improvement. Too many disadvantaged pupils and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are absent too often. The school is taking steps to improve attendance. However, it is too soon to see evidence of impact. When pupils miss lessons through absence, staff do not ensure that they catch up with missed work. This means that pupils quickly fall behind. This was an area for improvement at the last inspection in 2017.
p.2
better?
Leaders have not checked pupils’ attendance and welfare at alternative provision and work-experience placements rigorously enough. Leaders do not know whether these pupils are safe.
p.2
better?
In 2019, progress by the end of key stage 4 improved significantly. However, pupils have not achieved as well as other pupils nationally for the last three years. 5–6 November 2019
p.2
3
Learning is well planned in mathematics, English and science. In these subjects, subject leaders make sure that teachers develop their subject knowledge and skills well. This helps teachers to identify and address pupils’ misunderstandings quickly. However, this is not the case in all subjects. In some subjects, teachers do not check pupils’ learning closely enough. They sometimes miss the fact that some pupils are switching off because the work is either too easy or too hard.
p.3
3
Leaders have recently reviewed the curriculum. Pupils study GCSE options from Year 9. Pupils and parents value the wide range of options available. However, very few pupils study modern foreign languages at GCSE. This is because pupils study French in Year 6, then change to Spanish in Years 7 and 8. As a result, pupils do not develop a deep understanding of any language. Without a modern foreign language, pupils are not studying the full range of EBacc subjects, which limits their options at the end of key stage 4.
p.3
3
In the sixth form, students enjoy lively and exciting lessons. They benefit from teachers’ knowledge and passion for their subject. Despite this, students do not achieve in their A levels as well as other pupils nationally with similar starting points.
p.3
3
Because of the different way schools are organised in the local area, pupils join the school at different points in their education. Staff and pupils cope well with this potentially disruptive situation. Leaders and governors are working hard with other local schools to try to coordinate movement more effectively and raise standards. Those pupils who join the school at the beginning of Year 6 and who attend school regularly make stronger progress than others.
p.3
3
Pupils’ personal development is a strength of the school. Pupils know about life in modern Britain. They celebrate diversity. Pupils who do not speak English when they arrive in school are welcomed and supported by others. In philosophy and ethics, pupils learn about different faiths and other ways of seeing the world. In tutor periods, pupils debate current affairs. This helps to develop their confidence as they move into the adult world.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders have not ensured that pupils are safe when they are attending alternative provision settings. Health and safety checks and risk assessments have not been carried out for pupils engaged in potentially hazardous activity, such as construction or landscaping. Leaders have not checked the safeguarding arrangements for work- experience providers. Leaders do not know if pupils have arrived at their placements or not, so do not follow up if pupils are missing.
p.3
Safeguarding
All other safeguarding arrangements in the school are robust and thorough. The designated safeguarding leader (DSL) keeps rigorous records, ensures that staff are well trained and works closely with external agencies to keep children safe. 5–6 November 2019
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Leaders and governors must ensure that they are fulfilling their statutory responsibilities for keeping pupils safe. This applied to when pupils are attending alternative provision or work-experience settings. Leaders and governors must ensure that the system and procedures in place to check and follow up on pupils’ attendance are robust, that health and safety risk assessments are carried out and that all providers have completed the necessary recruitment checks and provided training for their staff in safeguarding. Attendance overall has been stubbornly below the national average. Leaders’ hard work with families and external agencies to improve attendance has had limited success so far. Leaders need to review the way they support and challenge families so that attendance improves quickly. The key stage 4 curriculum offer is very broad. Many of the GCSE subjects offered appeal to pupils’ interests. However, very few pupils opt for modern foreign
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
languages at key stage 4. Leaders should ensure that pupils develop a deeper understanding in French or Spanish at key stage 3 to encourage more pupils to opt for modern foreign languages at GCSE. There have been some recent improvements in pupils’ progress at key stage 4. However, pupils’ attainment and progress at other key stages remain below national averages. Leaders do not currently have sufficient oversight of many aspects of the school’s work to bring about the necessary improvements. Monitoring activities need to be strengthened to evaluate whether leaders’ work is having the intended impact on pupils’ learning and achievement. Leaders should ensure that their expectations in terms of behaviour are understood and consistently applied by all staff.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you're not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' refers to those pupils who attract government 5–6 November 2019
p.4
5
pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 5–6 November 2019
p.5
School details
Inspection number 10111667 Type of school Middle and secondary comprehensive
p.6
sixth form
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.6
sixth form
Date of previous inspection 10–11 May 2017
p.6
Information about this school
Since the last inspection, the school has moved from two separate sites onto a single site. The school uses three alternative providers: Aspire, U-turn and Medical Education Team, Worcestershire.
p.6
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. In accordance with section 44(2) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than it might in all the circumstances reasonably be expected to perform. 5–6 November 2019
p.6
7
Before the inspection, I analysed the school’s published data and reviewed documents on the school’s website. A conversation took place with the headteacher and senior deputy headteacher to discuss the curriculum and plan the inspection. We met with subject leaders, visited lessons, scrutinised pupils’ work and met with teachers and pupils in a range of subjects. I met with the chair and vice-chair of governors, along with other governors. A meeting was held with the local authority appointed school improvement adviser. Meetings were held with members of staff and pupils. Safeguarding documents were scrutinised, including the record of pre- employment checks on staff. We spoke to pupils informally at break and lunchtime about their safety and well- being. An inspector visited one of the alternative providers used by the school and had telephone conversations with a range of other providers, including work-
p.7
7
experience placements. We met with leaders of the sixth form and the SENCo, as well as those responsible for alternative provision, safeguarding, careers guidance and pupil- premium funding. Records of attendance, exclusions, detentions and use of the internal isolation room were examined. As part of this inspection, we looked in detail at English, mathematics, science, philosophy and ethics, and Spanish.
p.7
Inspection team
Jane Spilsbury, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Sara Arkle Ofsted Inspector 5–6 November 2019
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion