Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Sunnymede Infant School

Inspected 13 Nov 2019 · published 9 Jan 2020 · URN 114942

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Cassandra Williams

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    13 Nov 2019

  • Inspectors verified

    Cassandra Williams

  • Postcode verified

    CM11 2HQ

  • Name on report verified

    Sunnymede Infant School

  • URN verified

    114942

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−7Mixedmore positive than 8% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisehappyeffectivelystrengthsoutstandingsafepositivepolitesupportive
Criticismconcernsweaknessesdecliningnot consistentlynot strongdo not knowat riskserious

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1374w−13
  • Safeguarding137w+13

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,504
longer than usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 58, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 72%Safeguarding 7%About the inspection 21%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Sunnymede Infant School Mons Avenue, Billericay, Essex CM11 2HQ

p.1

Outcome

Sunnymede Infant School continues to be a good school. However, inspectors have some concerns that standards may be declining, as set out below.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Sunnymede Infant School is a calm, friendly school with a positive atmosphere. Pupils behave well. Pupils of all ages play together and treat each other, and their teachers, with respect. Pupils are polite, friendly and happy to help one another. Older pupils look after early years children as lunchtime buddies.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils say that they are safe. Bullying rarely happens. However, if pupils are worried, they say that staff help to sort out any problems.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders expect the school’s values – ‘excellence, friendship, respect, determination and courage’ – from all pupils. Pupils know that they need to keep going when learning gets hard. Pupils are interested in their learning and they work well together.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils at Sunnymede achieve as well as their peers nationally and, on occasions, better. This is because a focus for key stage 1 pupils has been on the learning of reading, writing and mathematics. This has meant that pupils do not have access to the full broad curriculum that they should have.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Parents and carers are happy that their children attend this school. One parent summarised the views of most, saying Sunnymede is ‘a fantastic school that always puts the children’s well-being first’.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Leaders want pupils to achieve well in reading, writing and mathematics. However, this has meant removing pupils for additional basic skills work. These pupils then do not have the opportunity to learn about different subjects. This has narrowed the breadth of the curriculum for these pupils. As a result, they are not as well prepared for the next stage of their education. 12–13 November 2019

p.1

2

The quality of leadership of the school is variable. Not all leaders understand how to carry out their roles effectively. They do not check that teachers are following their plans. As a result, leaders do not know if the plans for the curriculum are working.

p.2

2

Governors are supportive of the school. However, they rely too much on the information leaders provide for them. Governors are not checking to make sure that this information is accurate. Governors do not have a true understanding of all the school’s strengths and weaknesses across the wider curriculum.

p.2

2

Teachers’ subject knowledge is not consistently strong across the curriculum. Leaders have not ensured that teachers have received sufficient training to develop their understanding of the content for every subject. This means that misconceptions in pupils’ learning are not addressed. For example, a teacher taught a calculation method but did not ensure that pupils understood the idea behind it, so pupils could be confused.

p.2

2

Support for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) is improving. When pupils find reading, writing and mathematics more difficult, they do receive support that helps them improve their knowledge and skills. Like all other pupils, pupils with SEND often miss out and do not receive teaching in all curriculum subjects. This means that they do not achieve as well across the foundation subjects.

p.2

2

In key stage 1, mathematics, phonics and reading are not taught effectively. In reading, the books pupils read are not matched well enough to the phonics that they know. Adults do not know enough about how pupils learn to read. They do not organise learning in phonics and reading in a logical order. The senior leaders agree that the consistency of teaching of mathematics, phonics and reading across the school is an area to further improve.

p.2

2

The quality of education provided in the early years is better than in the rest of the school. Children in the early years make a good start and are well prepared for learning in Year 1. They know what teachers expect and behave well. The teaching of reading and early mathematics begins straight away. Unlike the rest of the school, the teaching of reading meets children’s needs. Parents are full of praise for the Reception classes. One commented: ‘My child is very happy and excited to go to school. This is because an engaging learning environment has been created.’ Parents say that staff let them know how well their child is getting on.

p.2

2

Leaders provide a broad range of experiences outside the classroom to support and promote pupils’ personal development. Pupils meet local residents and learn about different cultures and beliefs. Visiting the local senior citizens’ home helps the pupils learn about what happens as they get older and how to be dementia-friendly. There are many popular clubs and activities, for example street dance, basketball, cello, football, gymnastics and the school of rock. The school achieved the Arts Mark Gold Award. However, the day-to-day curriculum does not provide enough opportunities to experience the breadth of the curriculum.

p.2

2

Staff say that leaders support them well. Leaders and governors have acted to help staff to manage their time well. For example, curriculum leaders have extra time to review and 12–13 November 2019

p.2

3

plan learning in their subjects. Their well-being is taken into consideration and staff value that.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Staff are well trained in safeguarding issues. They know the pupils well and can quickly spot any problems. Staff know how to report any concerns and are vigilant in doing so. Governors keep a close check that safeguarding practice is followed. Staff identify pupils at risk of harm. They ensure that pupils quickly get any help that they need. Leaders work closely with external agencies so that pupils receive timely and appropriate help.

p.3

Safeguarding

Pupils say that they feel safe in school. They learn how to keep themselves safe and know who they can turn to if they have any problems. They trust adults in school and are confident that any issues would be sorted out quickly and fairly. Parents agree that the school provides a safe and caring environment for learning.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Leaders have focused on the teaching of reading, writing and mathematics in key stage 1. They have not ensured that the curriculum that is in place matches the ambition and scope of the national curriculum in foundation subjects. Pupils, including those with SEND, sometimes miss out on learning in foundation subjects because they are receiving additional support with literacy and numeracy skills. Leaders should ensure that the curriculum implemented matches their intent and ensures that all pupils, including pupils with SEND, access the full national curriculum.  Leaders have not provided sufficient training so that teachers further develop their subject knowledge. Teachers are not able to implement the plans of leaders successfully and teaching is not consistently strong. Leaders must ensure that all teachers have the knowledge and skills in order to improve the quality of practice across the school.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Some subject leaders do not have the knowledge and skills to accurately evaluate the quality of teaching in their subject areas. They do not recognise where teachers are not implementing the curriculum as intended and how this is hindering pupils’ learning. This means that pupils are not achieving well across a broad range of subjects. Leaders must ensure that all subject leaders have the expertise and knowledge required to fulfil their roles effectively.  Leaders and governors do not use monitoring well to evaluate the school’s performance. They do not have an accurate understanding of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. Governors should ensure that the information they receive is accurate in order to hold leaders to account for the school’s improvement, including ensuring that pupils get their full entitlement to the national curriculum. 12–13 November 2019

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called a section 8 inspection of a good school or non-exempt outstanding school. We do not give graded judgements on a section 8 inspection. However, if we find some evidence that the school could now be better than good or that standards may be declining, then the next inspection will be a section 5 inspection. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the section 8 inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will convert the section 8 inspection to a section 5 inspection immediately.

p.4

Background

This is the second section 8 inspection since we judged the school to be good in November 2010.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 12–13 November 2019

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10110275 Type of school Infant

p.5

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Chair of governing body Mr Damian Pye and Mr Tony Ward (co-chairs) Headteacher Mrs Melissa Eades

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 11 February 2016

p.5

Information about this school

 There have been no significant changes since the last inspection.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 I met with the headteacher, deputy headteacher and other leaders, including the special educational needs coordinator. I also met with five members of the governing body, including the co-chairs.  I looked in depth at reading, mathematics and geography. For each of these three subjects, I spoke to senior leaders, curriculum leaders, teachers and pupils, visited lessons and looked at pupils’ work.  To inspect safeguarding, I spoke to the designated safeguarding leader and the governor responsible for safeguarding, checked the single central record, looked at the responses to the parent and staff surveys, and observed and spoke to pupils.  I observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and around the school and asked pupils for their views on behaviour and bullying.  I considered the 57 responses to Parent View and the 53 free-text responses. There 12–13 November 2019

p.5

6

were 16 responses to the pupil questionnaire and 22 responses to the staff questionnaire which were also taken into account.

p.6

Inspection team

Cassandra Williams, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector 12–13 November 2019

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion