Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Merrydale Junior School
Summary
Andy Lakatos (lead), Jeannie Haigh, Moira Dales
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
24 Oct 2019
- Inspectors verified
Andy Lakatos, Jeannie Haigh, Moira Dales
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
LE5 0PL
- Name on report verified
Merrydale Junior School
- URN verified
143244
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Consequently, pupils who struggle to read are not as well supported as they should be when reading independently. 23–24 October 2019 p.2
- Leaders need to ensure that the good work already exemplified in these subjects is continued in all subjects. ◼ Some pupils are not sufficiently well challenged in their reading. p.3
- This means that some pupils do not achieve as highly as they should. p.3
- They are clear about what should be taught to pupils in subjects and when. p.2
- Leaders need to ensure that the school’s approach to the teaching of reading is more consistent and enables all pupils to achieve their best. 23–24 October 2019 p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance12
“School leaders have high expectations for all pupils.” p.2Teaching & assessment9
“Most teachers teach pupils to develop strong comprehension skills.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 978
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 59, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 12 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Merrydale Junior School Claydon Road, Leicester, Leicestershire LE5 0PL
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Not previously inspected 23–24 October 2019
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils come from a variety of different cultural backgrounds. Most speak English as an additional language. They have good attitudes to learning. They develop their language and communication skills well. Pupils listen to their teachers and enjoy sharing their ideas and opinions. Pupils are enthusiastic about their learning. They relish making links between different subjects when learning new things. Pupils enjoy learning beyond their lessons, including going on trips linked to the curriculum. They develop their talents and interests well. There are lots of opportunities to take part in a range of sports and other clubs.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are respectful and behave well. They told us that they are treated fairly and equally by other pupils and by staff. Pupils understand bullying. They say that bullying is rare in school. They say that when it does happen, staff sort it out effectively.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
School leaders have high expectations for all pupils. Pupils work hard and try their best. The school’s curriculum, including the religious education programme, develops pupils’ cultural understanding well. Pupils appreciate the support of the pastoral staff. They help pupils with their social, emotional and personal development needs.
p.2
better?
The school provides a good quality of education. Leaders are developing an effective curriculum to meet the needs of all pupils. Teachers check what pupils already know when they join the school. They plan learning to develop pupils’ knowledge in different areas of the curriculum.
p.2
better?
Leaders plan structured learning in most subjects that builds on pupils’ previous learning. Staff consider the vocabulary they want pupils to know. They are clear about what should be taught to pupils in subjects and when. This helps pupils to learn and progress well. We could see that this is particularly true in subjects such as reading, mathematics, science, geography and history. In a minority of subjects, learning is less well organised. Subjects such as modern foreign languages and design technology are not planned as effectively. Leaders have started to review the content and order in which pupils will learn new things in these subjects. This work is not yet fully developed.
p.2
better?
Teachers develop pupils’ reading skills well. Pupils who need support to catch up with their reading have additional lessons in phonics. These lessons help them to develop their knowledge of letters and sounds. Training for staff has ensured that these lessons follow a clear structure. However, we found that the books that some pupils read do not accurately match the sounds they are taught. Consequently, pupils who struggle to read are not as well supported as they should be when reading independently. 23–24 October 2019
p.2
3
Most teachers teach pupils to develop strong comprehension skills. Teachers choose texts to interest and inspire pupils. They provide opportunities for pupils to share learning and revisit key vocabulary. Some teachers do not set challenging enough work to encourage pupils who are strong readers to achieve their best.
p.3
3
Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are well supported. Teachers have high aspirations for pupils with SEND. They check their understanding throughout lessons. Extra adults provide pupils with specific support when needed. Pupils with SEND are keen to learn and try their best.
p.3
3
Pupils who speak English as an additional language develop their communication skills well. Trained adults provide extra support and resources to help pupils to progress well in their learning.
p.3
3
Pupils enjoy learning about different cultures and religions. Leaders have created a harmonious school which embraces diversity. One pupil summed up the views of many when they said, ‘Although I am different to my friend, we are all the same on the inside.’
p.3
3
Leaders, including those who work for the trust, provide staff with effective training and support. They think carefully about the workload of staff. Members of the staff well-being group meet regularly. They ensure that the welfare of staff remains high priority.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
The school has a clear system in place for staff to report concerns. Leaders keep detailed records. These records document concerns and the actions that leaders have taken. Leaders are tenacious in getting the right support for pupils and their families. This includes seeking help from external agencies when appropriate. The pastoral team provides excellent care for pupils. Staff are trained to recognise the signs and indicators of abuse.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
◼ The curriculum in most subjects is planned sequentially and develops pupils’ knowledge well. Leaders need to ensure that the good work already exemplified in these subjects is continued in all subjects. ◼ Some pupils are not sufficiently well challenged in their reading. Not all teachers consistently plan work that is correctly matched to pupils’ abilities. This means that some pupils do not achieve as highly as they should. Leaders need to ensure that the school’s approach to the teaching of reading is more consistent and enables all pupils to achieve their best. 23–24 October 2019
p.3
4
◼ The school’s curriculum is not yet coherently planned and sequenced in some subjects. However, it is clear from the actions that leaders have already taken to plan other subjects in the curriculum that they are in the process of bringing this about.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you’re not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 23–24 October 2019
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10110019 Type of school Junior
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.5
Information about this school
◼ The school has a significantly higher proportion of pupils on roll who speak English as an additional language than is seen nationally. ◼ The school is part of the Discovery Schools Academy Trust. ◼ This is the first time the school has been inspected since its registration as a new school in November 2016. When the predecessor school was inspected it was judged to require improvement. ◼ The school is part of the Affinity Teaching School Alliance
p.5
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
◼ Inspectors met with the chair of the advisory board and a representative from the trust. We also met with several school leaders, including those with responsibility for different curriculum areas and the provision for pupils with SEND. ◼ We considered the following subjects in depth as part of the inspection: reading and phonics, mathematics, science and geography. Our inspection activity included: evaluation of curriculum planning; visits to lessons; scrutiny of pupils’ 23–24 October 2019
p.5
6
work; listening to pupils read; discussions with subject leaders, teachers and teaching assistants; and discussions with pupils about their learning in these subjects. ◼ We also considered the quality of the curriculum in physical education, religious education and computing. ◼ We took account of the 10 responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, and the school’s own parental satisfaction survey. We also considered the 31 responses to the staff questionnaire. There were no responses to the survey for pupils.
p.6
Inspection team
Andy Lakatos, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Moira Dales Ofsted Inspector 23–24 October 2019
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion