Other · Ofsted report
Empowerment Centre, Training And Consultancy Services Ltd
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
6 Dec 2019
- Inspectorssingle source
Gayle Saundry
- Postcode verified
SE5 0UB
- Name on report verified
Empowerment Centre, Training and Consultancy Service Ltd
- URN verified
2526603
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 25
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- —
- Average sentence
- 8 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Empowerment Centre, Training and Consultancy Service Ltd Monitoring visit report
p.1
Name of lead inspector: Gayle Saundry, Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.1
Type of provider: Independent learning provider
p.1
Address:
88 Wyndham Road London SE5 0UB Monitoring visit: Empowerment Centre, Training and Consultancy Services Ltd, 5–6 December 2019
p.1
Context and focus of visit
From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by ESFA and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the ‘Further education and skills inspection handbook’, especially the sections entitled ‘Monitoring visits’ and ‘Monitoring visits to providers that are newly directly publicly funded’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
Empowerment Centre, Training and Consultancy Services Ltd is an independent learning provider based in London. The provider first received funding in 2017 to deliver levy-funded apprenticeships. It has nine apprentices on the adult care worker level 2 standards-based apprenticeship, five apprentices on the lead adult care worker level 3 standards-based apprenticeship and five apprentices on the associate project management level 4 standards-based apprenticeship.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders and managers have not planned or delivered an effective curriculum. As a result, apprentices have not gained significant new knowledge, skills or behaviours.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders do not ensure that the requirements of an apprenticeship are met. The majority of apprentices are not paid for their time spent in off-the-job training, and commitment statements do not create an understanding between the provider, the apprentice and the employer.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders do not conduct appropriate initial assessment and recruitment of apprentices. As a result, two thirds of apprentices have left the programme. It is not clear that the apprentices who remain are on a programme which is suitable or challenging for them.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Managers do not adequately track the progress of apprentices. Their assignments are not assessed against merit or distinction criteria, and no achievement targets are set. Trainers do not use the outcomes of assessments to adapt the curriculum based on the needs of apprentices.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Managers do not systematically track the attendance of apprentices to training sessions. Leaders do not have high expectations for attendance and do not know Monitoring visit: Empowerment Centre, Training and Consultancy Services Ltd, 5–6 December 2019 which apprentices are not attending regularly.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Apprentices do not receive adequate preparation for their end-point assessments. No apprentices have successfully completed their qualification, even though they were due to do so many months ago.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Leaders and managers do not take a systematic approach to self-assessment or quality improvement. As such, significant areas for improvement, such as safeguarding, have not been identified quickly, nor have plans to improve been put in place.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Leaders have an ambition to train individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds to gain qualifications that offer them a greater range of future opportunities.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Leaders have correctly identified that issues with the recruitment process from their sole employer have contributed to poor retention of apprentices. As a result, leaders have ceased to recruit further from this employer.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Managers do not adequately tailor the curriculum to meet the needs of apprentices. The curriculum is not planned or sequenced beyond the assessment criteria, to consider the needs of apprentices’ job roles.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Apprentices do not receive continuity in their training. All programmes have been taught by multiple trainers and on several occasions no trainer was present at a training session. Trainers have not delivered taught sessions to the majority of apprentices for the past four months, even though no apprentices have yet been through their end-point assessment.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Trainers provide poor-quality feedback on apprentices’ work and during their reviews. In written work, trainers write comments such as ‘well done’, even when work needs to be improved. As a result, apprentices do not know how to improve their work. Reviews are not conducted with both apprentices and line managers present. As a result, opportunities to plan for apprentices to practise what they have learned in their training are missed. Records of reviews contain descriptions of activities apprentices have done but no evaluation of what they have done well or how to improve further.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Managers made inadequate use of initial English assessments. As a result, some apprentices do not have sufficient English skills to complete assignments successfully. No apprentices have gained their target level 2 English qualification. While they used to receive discrete English lessons to support their development, Monitoring visit: Empowerment Centre, Training and Consultancy Services Ltd, 5–6 December 2019 these no longer take place.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Managers have not done enough to embed the development of mathematics into the curriculum. Managers do not track the development of mathematics skills or identify areas for improvement. As such, apprentices are not supported to develop the skills they are missing to do their job well. No apprentices have gained their target level 2 mathematics qualification.
p.4
Insufficient progress
Trainers and assessors have appropriate qualifications and vocational experience to deliver their training.
p.4
Insufficient progress
Leaders are managers have not created a culture of safeguarding. Staff and governors have not received adequate safeguarding training to equip them to safeguard their apprentices.
p.4
Insufficient progress
Apprentices do not receive appropriate health and safety training at the start of their apprenticeship. This is critical as apprentices are often lone workers providing physical care to vulnerable adults.
p.4
Insufficient progress
Leaders do not keep adequate records of the pre-employment checks they have completed for their staff and volunteers.
p.4
Insufficient progress
Leaders have recently completed a ‘Prevent’ duty risk assessment and action plan. However, identified actions are yet to be taken. Leaders are not aware of the radicalisation and extremism risks that apprentices may face due to the areas in which they work and the roles that they perform. As such, apprentices are not made aware of how to identify and protect themselves against these risks.
p.4
Insufficient progress
The designated safeguarding lead is appropriately trained for their role. Monitoring visit: Empowerment Centre, Training and Consultancy Services Ltd, 5–6 December 2019 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
Insufficient progress
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.5
Insufficient progress
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
Insufficient progress
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.5
Insufficient progress
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion