Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
6 Jan 2020
- URN verified
EY494201
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 298
- about usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 35, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the 'Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage', which you can find at
p.1
Summary of outcome
www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 15 October 2019 the provider notified us of an incident involving a child in relation to safety. This notification means that the provider met their legal responsibility as set out in the early years foundation stage welfare requirements to notify Ofsted of a significant event.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We needed to investigate this concern to see whether the setting was meeting the Early Years Foundation Stage welfare requirements relating to; 'Accident or injury'; 'child supervision'; 'safety' and 'risk assessment'. We do not investigate to prove or disprove a complaint, but we look into the information we receive to see if the provider is meeting all legal requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We carried out an unannounced visit to the premises and found that the deployment of staff and their supervision of children was not effective enough to safeguard all children.
p.1
Summary of outcome
Following our investigation, we issued a notice of action to improve which required the provider to: ensure that children are adequately supervised and decide how to deploy staff to ensure children's needs are met and they are kept safe from harm.
p.1
Summary of outcome
A suitable response was received from the provider. The provider remains registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints for five years commencing on the date we complete our investigation.
p.2
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion