Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Southtown Primary School
Summary
Julie Winyard (lead), James Richards
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
27 Nov 2019
- Inspectors verified
James Richards, Julie Winyard
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
NR31 0HJ
- Name on report verified
Southtown Primary School
- URN verified
121010
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- One parent summarised comments sent to the inspection team, saying, ‘All staff are extremely approachable and caring towards the children. p.2
- Staff use the school’s behaviour plan well and have high expectations of pupils. p.2
- Pupils are very positive about the school and are proud of their achievements. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school’s curriculum is not sufficiently well planned in most curriculum subjects including mathematics. p.4
- Although leaders have worked to improve the quality of teaching, there remain a number of weaknesses in the curriculum that they have not fully addressed since the previous inspection. p.2
- The weaknesses in the curriculum impact negatively on all pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). p.3
- Senior leaders know the weaknesses in subject leadership and the curriculum. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Lessons do not consider what pupils already know and what their next steps should be so that they build their mathematical knowledge. p.2
- Subject leaders need to make sure teachers have the knowledge and confidence to teach all curriculum subjects, including in mathematics, and that lessons are carefully sequenced to help pupils gain understanding and knowledge over time. p.4
- Senior leaders need to make sure that subject leaders have the right training and support to plan and support teachers in teaching the curriculum. p.4
- This is because the planning and teaching of the curriculum is not helping pupils to learn as well as they should. p.2
- Senior leaders need to make sure that subject leaders understand how to sequence learning in their subjects so that subject plans set out precisely what pupils should understand and know by the end of each year. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Parents & families6
“Parents, staff and pupils agree that Southtown is a friendly school.” p.2Staff development4
“Leaders’ work has been hindered by the turbulence in staffing.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,124
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 58, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Southtown Primary School Tamworth Lane, Southtown, Great Yarmouth, Norfolk NR31 0HJ
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Good Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement 26–27 November 2019
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Parents, staff and pupils agree that Southtown is a friendly school. Pupils enjoy coming to school. One parent summarised comments sent to the inspection team, saying, ‘All staff are extremely approachable and caring towards the children. There is also very good communication with parents.’
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils like the adults who work with them and they enjoy learning. Pupils are very positive about the school and are proud of their achievements. They say the teachers give them loads of knowledge and ‘my brain gets bigger every day’. Pupils talk about their learning needs and how the school has given them confidence to do work and make good friends. There are lots of after-school clubs and most pupils attend one or more of these during the year.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are safe and well cared for. Pupils at Southtown Primary are kind to each other. They told inspectors that there is very little unkindness, saying: ‘Most of the time they’ll stop and make up and be friends again because you notice what you’ve done and apologise.’ If there is any bullying teachers sort it out straight away.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils’ behaviour in class and around the school is good. Staff use the school’s behaviour plan well and have high expectations of pupils. There are very few times when pupils do not listen to their teachers. On occasion, if pupils do not listen well it is typically because they do not understand what they are learning about. This is because the planning and teaching of the curriculum is not helping pupils to learn as well as they should.
p.2
better?
Although leaders have worked to improve the quality of teaching, there remain a number of weaknesses in the curriculum that they have not fully addressed since the previous inspection. Leaders’ work has been hindered by the turbulence in staffing.
p.2
better?
Mathematics is not taught well. Lessons do not consider what pupils already know and what their next steps should be so that they build their mathematical knowledge. The subject leader is working with teachers to improve planning and teaching. Recently, leaders introduced a new mathematics programme. This is beginning to improve teaching and learning in mathematics.
p.2
better?
Most of the curriculum is taught through topics. This topic-based curriculum is not well planned to ensure that learning over time helps pupils to know more about each subject. For example, pupils do not have a wide-ranging understanding of important vocabulary that is essential to subjects like history, geography or science. Subject leaders have started to identify subject-specific vocabulary, concepts, knowledge and skills, but this work is at an early stage of development. 26–27 November 2019
p.2
3
The weaknesses in the curriculum impact negatively on all pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Despite this, pupils are supported well through the nurture provision and in the special resource base (SRB). In these provisions, the special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) checks that pupils are getting the help they need. Pupils who access the nurture provision are well supported individually in reading, writing and mathematics. The SENCo works closely with the teacher in the SRB. Pupils in the SRB learn to read rapidly. Parents are pleased with the support for pupils with SEND.
p.3
3
Reading is a real strength in the school’s curriculum. Most children in the early years learn to read by the end of their year in Reception. Pupils use phonics well to read new words. Pupils enjoy reading and most are good readers by the end of Year 2. Teachers encourage pupils to read books by a wide range of authors and they share their love of books with pupils.
p.3
3
Adults take good care of children in the early years. Children settle in quickly and start to learn straight away. The early years leader organises the curriculum well. Most children learn to read, start to write simple sentences and do simple sums by the start of Year 1.
p.3
3
Pupils are well prepared for the next stage in their education and for life in modern Britain. For example, the ‘game of actual life’ project in Year 6 helps pupils understand what adult life is like, including learning about money management, employment and housing.
p.3
3
The headteacher and deputy headteacher have worked hard to improve the school since the last inspection. Governors and the local authority have supported leaders effectively. Senior leaders know the weaknesses in subject leadership and the curriculum. They are beginning to make the necessary improvements.
p.3
3
Staff are positive about working at the school. A few staff are concerned about workload, and the challenges of being a small school where a few people have lots of different responsibilities. Leaders ensure that staff have time during the week to plan their lessons. Staff new to the teaching profession say they are well supported.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders and staff do everything they can to make sure pupils are safe. Incidents are recorded meticulously. Other professionals working with the families find this information very helpful. Staff have regular training. They are confident to report any concerns using the computer-based system.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders and governors have built a strong pastoral support team. Family support workers work closely with families to make sure pupils get to school every day and on time. Leaders work well with the local authority to make sure pupils attend school every day. 26–27 November 2019
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The school’s curriculum is not sufficiently well planned in most curriculum subjects including mathematics. Senior leaders need to make sure that subject leaders understand how to sequence learning in their subjects so that subject plans set out precisely what pupils should understand and know by the end of each year. Subject leaders need to make sure teachers have the knowledge and confidence to teach all curriculum subjects, including in mathematics, and that lessons are carefully sequenced to help pupils gain understanding and knowledge over time. Senior leaders need to make sure that subject leaders have the right training and support to plan and support teachers in teaching the curriculum.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you’re not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 26–27 November 2019
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10110200 Type of school Primary
p.5
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 12–13 July 2017
p.5
Information about this school
Since the last inspection, four teachers and four support staff have joined the school. The school is in discussions with a multi-academy trust about the future of the school.
p.5
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
During this inspection, we held meetings with the headteacher, the deputy headteacher, who is also the SENCo, and staff. We also met with the subject leaders for reading, mathematics, history and science. We also met with the office administrator and the school’s social and emotional mental health team to discuss safeguarding. We met with members of the governing body including the chair and also with a representative from the local authority. The subjects of reading, mathematics, science and history were considered as part of this inspection. We also checked the curriculum provision in other subject 26–27 November 2019
p.5
6
areas during the second day of the inspection. We spoke to curriculum leaders, visited lessons, looked at a range of pupils’ work, and met with teachers and pupils. We visited phonics lessons, heard pupils read and observed staff reading to pupils as part of guided reading sessions. Alongside leaders, we looked at a sample of pupils’ books from different year groups and across a range of subjects to evaluate pupils’ learning in English, mathematics, science, history and throughout the wider curriculum. We spoke to pupils about their experiences of school life and their learning to find out what it is like to be a pupil at Southtown Primary School. Additionally, the 24 responses to the online questionnaire for pupils and 14 paper copies completed by pupils who could not access the online questionnaire, were considered. We also observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and during break and lunchtime. We considered the views of parents gathered at the beginning of the first day of
p.6
6
the inspection and also took account of the 16 responses to the Ofsted online questionnaire, Parent View, as well as the 10 free-text responses. We also discussed the school’s own parental and pupil surveys carried out by leaders. We took account of the 18 responses to Ofsted’s online staff questionnaire and met with all staff, including those new to teaching. We scrutinised a wide range of documents, including those related to curriculum planning and development, safeguarding, behaviour, attendance, exclusions, the school’s self-evaluation, the school’s development plans and the local authority’s work to support the school.
p.6
Inspection team
Julie Winyard, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
James Richards Ofsted Inspector 26–27 November 2019
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion