Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)

Little Bounders Preschool

Inspected 3 Dec 2019 · URN EY550929

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Julie Bruce

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Little Bounders Pre-School Committee

  • Group reference verified

    RP522605

  • Inspection date verified

    3 Dec 2019

  • Inspectors verified

    Julie Bruce

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Inadequate

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    PO6 4JB

  • Name on report verified

    Little Bounders Preschool

  • URN verified

    EY550929

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentInadequate
  • Quality of educationGood

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−11Mixedmore positive than 79% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisehigh expectationseffectivestrongconsistentlyclearaccuratepositivewell prepared
Criticismfailednot effectiveweaknessesweaklackconcernslimitedgaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings757w−9
  • Safeguarding223w−20
  • What needs to improve64w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,004
about usual (typical 972)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 51
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
3
typical 1
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 49%Safeguarding 14%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Inspection of Little Bounders Preschool Paulsgrove Community Centre, Marsden Road, Portsmouth PO6 4JB

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Not applicable

p.1

The provision is inadequate

The provider has failed to share information with Ofsted about changes to committee members. This is required to enable Ofsted to assess their suitability to oversee the running of a pre-school. There is no information available to show that necessary enhanced Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) checks for committee members are in place. Senior staff state that committee members are never left unsupervised with children. However, unchecked committee members do have contact with children during events and outings. This compromises children's well- being. In addition, at the time of inspection, information about staff recruitment was also limited. There were gaps in the provider's vetting records. It was not possible to verify that staff recruitment processes are consistently safe, in order to assure children's welfare.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

Educationally, staff have high expectations of all children. They prioritise activities that support children's good communication skills. Children are vocal. They behave well as they link up with good friends to discuss a mixture of topics.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

Children demonstrate physical agility in a variety of ways. For instance, they took part in a 'dough disco' activity. They flexed their hand muscles as they vigorously moulded dough. They moved their hands to the rhythm of upbeat music. Children opened their palms wide and stretched their fingers. Staff modelled different movements. Children accurately replicated actions as they squeezed the soft dough and proudly attributed meaning to their finished dough shapes. At times, however, older children move too quickly between rooms. This can be disconcerting for young children exploring the area.

p.2

need to do better?

n There are clear weaknesses in the self-evaluation process and the provider has breached a number of requirements. They have not informed Ofsted about changes to the pre-school committee. The provider does not have effective processes in place to check that committee members complete necessary forms and share these with Ofsted. They could not demonstrate that appropriate suitability checks have been done. The provider has also failed to keep accurate records about staff vetting procedures. There are missing details relating to DBS checks. It is not apparent when checks were obtained and by whom. This gives an incomplete picture of staff recruitment and of whether the process is thorough enough to ensure children are protected. n The provider does not offer effective support for senior staff to fully understand their roles and responsibilities. Senior staff step into the lead role when the manager is not available. However, they lack some confidence when they are

p.2

need to do better?

discussing the setting's policies and procedures.

p.2

need to do better?

3 December 2019 n Despite the provider being notified of the inspection taking place, all necessary records were not easily accessible as required. For example, important records such as first-aid certificates were only available to view in the last few minutes of the inspection. n Staff create a positive atmosphere where children are given the space and time to learn. They are incredibly sensitive to the needs of new children and families. Staff speak to parents to find out which comfort items they can introduce to help children settle quickly. They encourage even the youngest and quietest children to contribute to discussions. Children raise their hands to suggest what will happen in stories and to complete sentences in favourite books. n Children are fiercely independent and they display high levels of determination as they complete tasks for themselves. Children from a broad range of backgrounds are well prepared for the challenge of moving to school. Young

p.2

need to do better?

children collect fresh nappies from their bags. They take them across to staff when they recognise that they need to be changed. Children carefully pour drinks into cups for themselves and friends. n The staff form close links with professionals who work at local schools. They share information about children who are moving into the Reception-year group. They provide details about children who work well together. This is helpful for teachers who are allocating children to new classes. Staff are slightly slower to form strong links with practitioners at other early years settings children attend. They gain less information about children's development, to help them establish a shared approach to their learning and care. n Staff reflect on some aspects of their practice. They identified that sometimes older children move between the main room and the kitchen area too quickly. They are continuing to formulate rules with children to help them be mindful of

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Procedures for ensuring the suitability of committee members and staff are weak. Therefore children's welfare is not assured. However, staff do have a clear understanding of child protection and the type of issues which have an impact on children's lives. They understand how important it is for parents to be able to meet children's developmental and medical needs. They offer help and assistance to families who they identify require more support. Staff know how to raise concerns promptly with agencies who have responsibility for safeguarding children.

p.3

Due date

3 December 2019 implement effective processes to share information about changes to committee members with Ofsted, to make sure Ofsted is always aware of who is overseeing the running of the pre-school 28/01/2020

p.3

Due date

ensure that all committee members submit necessary forms to Ofsted to allow it to carry out essential background suitability checks 28/01/2020

p.4

Due date

keep accurate records of the vetting processes for staff, including where there have been breaks in employment, to evidence details of when enhanced DBS checks were obtained and by whom 28/01/2020

p.4

Due date

provide support for senior staff to fully understand their roles and responsibilities, so that they can provide effective cover when the manager is unavailable 28/01/2020

p.4

Due date

ensure that all required records relating to the running of the setting are readily available and accessible for inspection. 28/01/2020

p.4

should:

n increase support for children to help them consider the needs of others when they are moving around indoors n strengthen partnerships with staff at all other early years settings that children attend, in order to provide children with high levels of consistency in their learning n develop systems for self-evaluation to promptly identify all areas for improvement and to raise standards of care.

p.4

Setting details

Unique reference number EY550929 Local authority Portsmouth Inspection number 10130750 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises Registers Early Years Register Day care type Sessional day care Age range of children 2 to 3 Total number of places 24 Number of children on roll 18 Name of registered person Little Bounders Pre-School Committee

p.5

reference number

Telephone number 07563375175 Date of previous inspection Not applicable

p.5

Information about this early years setting

Little Bounders Preschool re-registered in 2017 after moving premises. However, the committee that runs the pre-school first registered in 1990. The setting operates from Paulsgrove Community Centre, Portsmouth. There are five staff who work directly with children; four of these hold childcare qualifications at a level 3. The pre-school is in receipt of free early education funding for children aged two and three years. The pre-school is open on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday, between 9am and 3pm. On Thursday they are open between 9am and midday. The setting is open during term time only.

p.5

Inspection activities

n The inspector took a learning walk with the deputy manager at the start of the inspection. They talked about how staff plan activities to meet children's needs. n The inspector and the deputy manager evaluated the effectiveness of a planned group activity. n Parents offered their opinions about the pre-school. n The deputy manager joined the inspector for a leadership and management meeting. They discussed support offered to both staff and children. n The inspector spoke to staff about the progress children in their key groups have made since they started at pre-school.

p.6

Inspection activities

We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.6

Inspection activities

3 December 2019 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspection activities

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspection activities

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.7

Inspection activities

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspection activities

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion