Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

George Stephenson High School

Inspected 28 Nov 2019 · published 20 Dec 2019 · URN 108639

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    28 Nov 2019

  • Inspectors verified

    Darren Stewart, Garry Stout, Jamie Lawler, Jill Bowe, Marc Doyle

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    NE12 6SA

  • Name on report verified

    George Stephenson High School

  • URN verified

    108639

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.

  • OverallGood
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+27Mostly positivemore positive than 9% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisewell-plannedhigh expectationspositiveimprovedstrengthseffectivestrong relationshipsrespectful
Criticismlackconcernsconcernnot well plannedyet tonot effectivenot happyexclusions

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1154w+34
  • Safeguarding103w−10

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,222
about usual (typical 1098)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 58, typical 55
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Safeguarding 6%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Inspection of George Stephenson High School Southgate, Killingworth, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Tyne and Wear NE12 6SA

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Sixth-form provision Good Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement 27–28 November 2019

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Staff have high expectations for pupils and each other. This is a key ingredient of the school community. During lesson visits, pupils were attentive and respectful. Most show positive attitudes to their learning. There are strong relationships between teachers and pupils. As a result, pupils have achieved better examination results in a wide range of subjects since the previous inspection.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The majority of pupils behave well during social times. They take responsibility for their actions. Pupils in the main school and students in the sixth form are proud to be part of George Stephenson High School. There is a small minority of pupils who are yet to display the levels of responsibility their peers do. Pupils say how these pupils are too silly during social times. Pupils are reassured by staff and they know who to speak to if they have a worry or concern. During discussions, pupils said they are confident that if any issue arises a member of staff will sort it out for them.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils access a wide range of extra-curricular activities. Such activities benefit pupils’ personal, social and cultural development.

p.2

better?

George Stephenson High School has improved since the previous inspection. Staff, pupils and parents share this view. All leaders are committed to ensuring that pupils benefit from a well-planned curriculum. The curriculum on offer throughout key stage 3 is broad. It provides pupils with a good foundation of knowledge and skills. This prepares pupils well for the interesting curriculum on offer at key stage 4. Similarly, in the sixth form, students can opt from a suite of academic and applied courses. There is a diverse curriculum on offer throughout the school. Pupils in the main school and students in the sixth form are well served. They get appropriate advice and guidance. As a result, they choose subjects that suit their strengths and interests. Leaders and governors are reflective and review their curriculum offer regularly. They have an accurate view of the strengths of the school. They know what needs further improvement. For example, the addition of computer science to

p.2

better?

the curriculum has proven popular. Leaders intend for it to be offered more widely.

p.2

better?

Teachers have good subject knowledge. In many subjects, schemes of work make it clear to teachers what they need to teach and when. Teachers know how pupils are doing because assessment is used well. This helps them to check what pupils know and remember. For example, in modern languages, history and geography pupils can recall prior learning well. It is less effective in mathematics, where some pupils struggled to recall what they had learned before. This is because the curriculum is not as well planned as in other subjects. Some concepts are not revisited enough or in enough depth for pupils to secure their understanding. This is particularly in key stage 3.

p.2

better?

For most of the time, pupils and sixth-form students say teachers expect them to 27–28 November 2019

p.2

3

think hard about their learning. A review of pupils’ work in modern languages, history and geography shows how they are studying topics in great depth. Pupils also said that in some subjects their work was sometimes too easy. This is particularly in English, and in key stage 3. Aspects of the English curriculum lack opportunities for pupils to grapple with tricky concepts or ideas. Pupils and sixth- form students would benefit from developing more detailed knowledge across a wider range of subjects.

p.3

3

Teachers have good relationships with the pupils in their classes. Pupils said that behaviour has improved, and most staff use school routines and rewards fairly. Most pupils contribute well in lessons because teachers question them well.

p.3

3

Leaders ensure that those pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) can access a range of well-planned literacy support. This is benefiting most. Teachers get information about the individual needs of pupils with SEND. Some staff meet these pupils’ specific needs well. However, a much broader programme of professional development would benefit staff so that pupils’ experiences are consistent across the curriculum.

p.3

3

Students in the sixth form said they feel ‘lucky’ to be part of the school community. They are great ambassadors for the school and act as positive role models to younger pupils. Most students achieve well. Almost all students progress onto appropriate higher-education courses, training or employment.

p.3

3

A concerted effort to improve attendance has paid off. Attendance is now at the national average for pupils in the main school, and it is very good in the sixth form. While exclusions have risen so far this year, they are still low. Fewer disadvantaged pupils miss school. Leaders’ strategies to improve attendance and improve behaviour have benefited pupils’ learning.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. The deputy headteacher and her team ensure that safeguarding takes high priority.

p.3

Safeguarding

Staff are well trained to look after and care for pupils. They understand the school’s safeguarding procedures. They are aware of the need to share any concerns with appropriate people. They do so in a timely manner.

p.3

Safeguarding

Pupils know there is always somebody to talk to when they need help. Pupils know how to keep themselves safe. A small number of pupils had concerns about how bullying is dealt with; inspectors were satisfied that the school has a handle on this area of their work.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The content choices in schemes of work for English and mathematics, particularly for those pupils in Year 9, lack breadth and depth. Pupils lack the depth of understanding needed to be as well prepared as they could be for key stage 4. Leaders should continue with their efforts to further improve the quality and progression of curriculum schemes of work, particularly for transition between key stages 3 and 4. The transition arrangements have been applied.  The quality of planning for pupils to think hard about a concept or idea varies across subjects, and at times pupils are not given sufficient opportunities to think deeply about a concept or idea. In the curriculum plans, leaders and teachers must identify opportunities for pupils, and students in the sixth form, to think more deeply about concepts. Leaders should ensure that these opportunities are effective in maximising pupils’ progress.  A small minority of staff have accessed the training they need to support pupils

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

with SEND well. However, in a few subjects pupils with SEND do not acquire the knowledge and skills they need. Leaders, including the special educational needs coordinator, should ensure that they use professional development opportunities to share expertise in supporting the learning of pupils with SEND, so that they can help more pupils with SEND achieve higher standards.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you’re not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 27–28 November 2019

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10121687 Type of school Secondary

p.5

provision

Number of pupils on the school roll 1,203

p.5

sixth form

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

sixth form

Date of previous inspection 1–2 November 2017

p.5

Information about this school

 The school currently uses alternative provision at Moorbridge and PALS to contribute to the education of eight pupils.  The school is a larger-than-average-sized secondary school. Almost all pupils are White British. Very few speak English as an additional language.  The proportion of disadvantaged pupils supported through the pupil premium is average.  The proportion of pupils with SEND is below average.

p.5

Information about this inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 During the inspection, we spoke with pupils about their work and what it was like to be a pupil at the school. We also spoke to sixth-form students about what it 27–28 November 2019

p.5

6

was like to be part of the school’s sixth form.  We held meetings with senior leaders, governors, curriculum leaders and the school improvement partner from the local authority.  We reviewed documentation, which included leaders’ evaluation of the school’s strengths and areas for improvement, and the school improvement plan. We scrutinised information about attendance and behaviour.  We additionally reviewed a range of documentation and information about safeguarding, including the school’s record of checks undertaken on newly appointed staff and support for pupils. We also visited and spoke to representatives of the alternative provision used by the school.  We considered the views expressed by parents and carers through the 135 responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Ofsted Parent View, as well as parents’ comments received via the free-text facility on Ofsted Parent View. We considered the 96 responses to the questionnaire for pupils and the 54 responses to the

p.6

6

questionnaire for staff.  We focused deeply on English, mathematics, history, geography and modern languages during the inspection. We met with curriculum leaders, visited lessons, spoke with pupils, met with teaching staff and looked at pupils’ work. We also considered other subjects as part of the inspection.

p.6

Inspection team

Darren Stewart, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Marc Doyle Ofsted Inspector 27–28 November 2019

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion