Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Gedling Borough Council

Inspected 7 Nov 2019 · published 18 Dec 2019 · URN 2495243

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Russ Henry

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    7 Nov 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Russ Henry

  • Postcode verified

    NG5 6LU

  • Name on report verified

    Gedling Borough Council

  • URN verified

    2495243

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−20Mixedmore positive than 15% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praisewell-plannedeffectivesuccessfulfeel safeaccurateclearlyclearsecure
Criticismnot alwaysweaknesseslackconcernstoo manyslownot effectivelybelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,081
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Gedling Borough Council Monitoring visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Russ Henry, Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.1

Address: Civic Centre Arnot Hill Park Arnold Nottingham NG5 6LU Monitoring visit: Gedling Borough Council, 6–7 November 2019

p.1

Context and focus of visit

From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by the Education and Skills Funding Agency and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the ‘Further education and skills inspection handbook’, especially the sections entitled ‘Monitoring visits’ and ‘Monitoring visits to providers that are newly directly publicly funded’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

Gedling Borough Council is a local authority. Its offices are in Arnold, on the outskirts of Nottingham city centre. At the time of the monitoring visit, 18 apprentices followed standards programmes at level 3. There were 14 team leaders, two business administrators, and two public service delivery officers. It had recruited apprentices in two separate cohorts. At the time of the visit, apprentices in the first group were approaching the end of their programmes.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Managers have developed the apprenticeship programme as part of the overall package of training available to council employees. Almost all apprentices work for the council, except one who works for a neighbouring council. Managers and staff have identified the specific knowledge and skills that apprentices need to learn to make them more productive members of staff. They have devised coherent off-the- job training programmes that meet the requirements of apprenticeships.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Trainers are appropriately qualified and experienced in their occupational areas. They have extensive experience as trainers and are qualified assessors. They make effective use of workbooks and online resources to supplement classroom-based learning activities.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Managers recruit apprentices carefully. They work with line managers at the council to identify individuals who are most likely to benefit substantially from training. This has helped to ensure that apprentices in the second cohort remain motivated and develop a good range of new knowledge, skills and behaviours. However, managers did not choose recruits to the first cohort as carefully and too many have dropped out. Monitoring visit: Gedling Borough Council, 6–7 November 2019 Managers review the quality of programmes and produce an accurate self- assessment report. They identified several weaknesses during the training of the first group of apprentices, and they have made changes for the second cohort. For example, they selected a different diploma qualification for team leader apprentices that is a better match for their work roles.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Trainers do not do enough to ensure that activities in the workplace support and reinforce apprentices’ off-the-job training. Training staff do not participate in quarterly reviews with apprentices and their line managers, and line managers do not always know what apprentices need to practise in the workplace.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Apprentices benefit from well-planned and well-structured off-the-job training. Trainers have identified the key skills and knowledge that apprentices should gain. They have planned programmes so that they present topics in a sensible order, enabling apprentices to develop their understanding progressively. As a result, apprentices produce written and practical work that meets the expected standards.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Apprentices develop a good range of knowledge, skills and behaviours. Trainers know their subjects well and help apprentices to understand how their training relates to their job roles. For example, they enabled one apprentice to use her increasing skills in planning and forecasting to complete a successful project related to fly-tipping in the local community.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Managers have made arrangements to support apprentices as they prepare for end- point assessments (EPAs). They have appointed a specialist trainer to help apprentices present their portfolios clearly and prepare them for professional discussions about their work. However, although apprentices know what to do for their EPAs, they are less clear about how to gain higher grades.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Staff have not included English and mathematics training early enough in the programmes for the very small number of apprentices who lack qualifications in these subjects. Because of this, these apprentices are unable to produce their best work until later in their programmes.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Apprentices meet regularly with their line managers to discuss and agree targets for completion of assessments. Although training staff monitor the progress apprentices make, they often do not attend review meetings. As a result, they do not always deal effectively with apprentices who make slow progress. Monitoring visit: Gedling Borough Council, 6–7 November 2019

p.3

Significant progress

The council has a comprehensive safeguarding policy. This includes guidance on how staff should deal with and report concerns and disclosures. It gives explicit guidance on how staff should behave towards children and young people, including through electronic means. Council staff follow appropriate safer recruitment practices, by checking the backgrounds of staff who work with apprentices.

p.4

Significant progress

The designated lead officer is well trained and has a clear understanding of his role. He has extensive knowledge of local safeguarding problems, such as domestic violence and modern slavery. He has contact with a range of other local agencies, whose roles he understands well.

p.4

Significant progress

Apprentices feel safe. They receive safeguarding training appropriate to their role at the council and further training as part of their apprenticeship programme. As a result, they have a good understanding of safeguarding, including the risks of radicalisation and extremism. Monitoring visit: Gedling Borough Council, 6–7 November 2019 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Significant progress

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Significant progress

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Significant progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Significant progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion