Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Staffordshire University Academy
Summary
Bianka Zemke (lead), Julie Griffiths, Steve Byatt
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
27 Nov 2019
- Inspectors verified
Bianka Zemke, Julie Griffiths, Steve Byatt
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Inadequate
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
WS12 4JH
- Name on report verified
Staffordshire University Academy
- URN verified
137164
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Standards at the school have been low and pupils’ outcomes poor, due to previous weak teaching and significant staffing issues at all levels. p.2
- In the past, leaders and the trust have been slow to tackle weaknesses. p.2
- This has led to weak outcomes for pupils. p.2
- In the past, leaders and the trust have taken too long to address weaknesses. p.2
- Incidents of poor behaviour are now rare. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- As a result, some pupils do not achieve as well as they should. p.2
- These leaders and teachers continue to focus on what pupils need to be able to do in their GCSE examinations rather than developing a depth of knowledge across their subject areas. p.2
- These leaders and teachers focus on what pupils need to be able to do in their GCSE examinations, rather than developing a depth of knowledge across their subject areas. p.4
- This is preventing some pupils in some subjects from gaining the knowledge and skills that they need to succeed. p.4
- These leaders should ensure that pupils in key stage 3 have the opportunity to study the appropriate curriculum. p.4
- Leaders at all levels need to ensure that the rate of improvement continues at pace. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance21
“In the past, leaders and the trust have been slow to tackle weaknesses.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,252
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 57, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Staffordshire University Academy Marston Road, Hednesford, Cannock, Staffordshire WS12 4JH
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Sixth-form provision Requires improvement Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Inadequate 26–27 November 2019
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The quality of education at Staffordshire University Academy has improved but is not yet good enough. There remains too much variation in the delivery of the curriculum in different subjects, such as mathematics, science and modern foreign languages (MFL). This has led to weak outcomes for pupils. In the past, leaders and the trust have taken too long to address weaknesses. Recently, improvement work has quickened, and issues have been tackled effectively. The curriculum design and pupils’ behaviour and attendance have improved.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Generally, relationships between pupils and teachers are respectful and purposeful. Pupils say that lessons can still be interrupted by incidents of low-level disruption. Records show that these incidences are still too frequent. Pupils’ attendance has improved, as they begin to value their education.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Most pupils say that things are now better and that they like the school. Bullying is rare, and staff deal quickly with any that does occur. Pupils feel safe and are safe.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The provision for pupils’ personal development is a clear strength of the school. Leaders ensure that all pupils, including pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and disadvantaged pupils, take part in extra-curricular activities, trips, visits and residentials. Pupils value these opportunities.
p.2
better?
Standards at the school have been low and pupils’ outcomes poor, due to previous weak teaching and significant staffing issues at all levels. In the past, leaders and the trust have been slow to tackle weaknesses. Leadership at the school is now stable. Leaders have begun to stem the decline and put things right. They have introduced new policies and systems to improve the school. As a result, there are improvements in the design of the curriculum and pupils’ personal development, behaviour and attendance.
p.2
better?
Leaders have created a curriculum so that pupils learn in a broad range of subjects. They are clear about what pupils should learn and in what order. However, the delivery of subject plans varies between subjects. For example, in mathematics pupils do not deepen their learning well enough. In MFL at key stage 3, pupils do not learn in sufficient depth. Some teaching remains less effective in ensuring that pupils gain the expected skills and knowledge. As a result, some pupils do not achieve as well as they should.
p.2
better?
Assessment systems in key stage 3 are not detailed and effective enough. Some staff see key stage 3 as preparation time for key stage 4. These leaders and teachers continue to focus on what pupils need to be able to do in their GCSE examinations rather than developing a depth of knowledge across their subject areas. This is preventing pupils in some subjects from gaining the broad knowledge 26–27 November 2019
p.2
3
Leaders have made the decision to enter pupils in Year 10 for their GCSE examinations in English Literature and chemistry. Pupils do not have sufficient time to cover the whole study programme and embed their learning fully in these subjects, so this is not an effective practice. Pupils say that they would have achieved a better grade had they had more time.
p.3
3
Leaders place pupils’ personal development at the centre of learning. Pupils benefit from the strong pastoral care provided by staff. Leaders know their pupils well and make sure that they have many valuable opportunities to learn beyond the classroom. There is a variety of extra-curricular opportunities, trips and visits, which pupils enjoy. They speak very highly of the opportunities the school provides. Leaders have developed a comprehensive careers advice programme to teach pupils about future employment choices. Pupils are well prepared for their next steps in education.
p.3
3
Pupils’ behaviour has improved. Incidents of poor behaviour are now rare. Fewer pupils are excluded from the school. There remain too many times when a minority of pupils are removed from their lessons due to low-level disruptions.
p.3
3
Currently, there are only a small number of students the sixth form. Year 12 and 13 students studying the same subject are currently taught together for most subjects. This does not give students the opportunity to study subjects in enough depth. They do not deepen their knowledge, skills and understanding well enough in those subjects. The sixth form is inclusive. It offers some students the experience of further study which they may not have received elsewhere. Students’ personal development is a strength. Students enjoy the sixth form and act as role models to younger peers. They receive effective careers advice and guidance. Most students who complete the courses move on to further or higher education, apprenticeships and employment.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
All staff understand that keeping pupils safe is their top priority. Teachers know what to do if they have any concerns about a pupil. Teachers report concerns, however minor, to the safeguarding team. Staff know their pupils well and use this information to ensure that pupils are safe.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders have ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose. They complete appropriate employment checks and keep accurate records. Staff follow up any concerns with outside agencies. Leaders make sure that pupils and their families receive the support they need.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The delivery of the curriculum remains variable. This means that some pupils do not learn some subjects in sufficient depth and continue to underperform. Leaders need to ensure that the curriculum in each subject area covers the appropriate content in sufficient depth so that pupils gain the knowledge and skills they need to be successful. Some leaders continue to view key stage 3 as preparation time for key stage 4. These leaders and teachers focus on what pupils need to be able to do in their GCSE examinations, rather than developing a depth of knowledge across their subject areas. This is preventing some pupils in some subjects from gaining the knowledge and skills that they need to succeed. These leaders should ensure that pupils in key stage 3 have the opportunity to study the appropriate curriculum. In the past, governors, leaders and the trust have been too slow to improve the school. This changed at the start of this academic year, and improvements are
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
now evident. Leaders at all levels need to ensure that the rate of improvement continues at pace. Entering pupils for examinations early in some subjects such as English literature and chemistry has not been effective. Pupils do not achieve as well as they could. Leaders need to ensure that pupils have sufficient time to study all subjects in depth and achieve their potential. Sixth-form students do not study subjects in sufficient depth. This is because both year groups learn in the same classroom and are taught by one teacher at the same time. Leaders need to make sure that students can study their chosen subjects in enough depth and breadth in order to gain sufficient knowledge, skills and understanding.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you’re not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 26–27 November 2019
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10088446 Type of school Secondary
p.5
sixth form
Date of previous inspection 25–26 April 2017
p.5
Information about this school
There have been significant staffing changes at all levels in the school since the last inspection. This includes the senior leadership team. The school’s governance structure includes a local academy committee which acts as a local governing body. A small number of pupils attend alternative provision at ‘The Bridge’, a pupil referral unit.
p.5
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. In accordance with section 13(4) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that the school no longer requires special measures. 26–27 November 2019
p.5
6
We met with the principal, vice principal, senior leaders, the special educational needs coordinator and safeguarding leader as well as a range of subject coordinators and teachers. The lead inspector met with members of the local academy committee, including the chair and the chief executive officer of the trust. We scrutinised the school’s safeguarding arrangements and documentation, including the single central record. We met with the designated safeguarding lead and special educational needs coordinator. We spoke with staff and pupils about safeguarding. We completed various inspection activities to gather evidence on the quality of education. There was a focus on English, mathematics, science, MFL and history. This included lesson visits, looking at pupils’ work and discussions with teachers and pupils about their learning. All other subjects were also considered as part of the inspection. We observed pupils’ behaviour during lessons and at break and lunchtimes. We
p.6
6
spoke to pupils and staff about behaviour. We considered 36 responses from staff to the Ofsted staff survey and 35 parent responses to Ofsted’s Parent View questionnaire. We also considered 52 responses from pupils to Ofsted’s pupil survey.
p.6
Inspection team
Bianka Zemke, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Julie Griffiths Ofsted Inspector 26–27 November 2019
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion