Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 20 Nov 2019

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Bryony Freeman (lead), Andrew Hook, Joanna Brinkley

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    20 Nov 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Andrew Hook, Bryony Freeman, Joanna Brinkley

  • Postcode verified

    E12 5PB

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+79Very positivemore positive than 94% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisevery wellstronghighly effectiveambitiousextremelyexcellentexceptionallyhigh expectations
Criticismconcernsat riskharmlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
891
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 48
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
1
typical 2
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Ms Katherine Sewell Sheringham Primary School Sheringham Avenue Manor Park London E12 5PB

p.1

No formal designation inspection of Sheringham Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 19–20 November 2019 with Bryony Freeman, Her Majesty’s Inspector, and David Lloyd and Joanna Brinkley, Ofsted Inspectors, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings.

p.1

No formal designation inspection of Sheringham Primary School

This inspection was conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for inspecting schools with no formal designation. The inspection was carried out because Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector wished to determine the effectiveness of safeguarding arrangements and the quality of education provided by the school.

p.1

Evidence

Inspectors scrutinised the single central record and other documents relating to safeguarding and child protection arrangements. We met with the headteacher, senior leaders and subject leaders, teachers, and with representatives of the multi- academy trust and the local governing body, including the chair.

p.1

Evidence

We examined the school’s curriculum information including for personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) education. We visited lessons, listened to pupils read and held discussions with pupils, parents and staff to gather their views.

p.1

Evidence

Having considered the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Context

Sheringham Primary School is larger than the average-sized primary school with 612 pupils from Reception to Year 6. The school converted to academy status in September 2012 and is a member of the Learning in Harmony Trust. Staff are settled in this school and turnover is low. The rate of pupils starting or leaving during different times of the school year is high. The majority of pupils speak English as an additional language and a high proportion are from ethnic minority groups. The proportion of pupils entitled to free school meals is above the national average. The proportion of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) is above that seen nationally.

p.2

Context

The quality of education at this school has been maintained. The strong leadership team set exceptionally high expectations and are ambitious for the pupils. The decisions they make are extremely well considered. They place the pupils’ academic and personal development needs at the core of everything they do.

p.2

Context

During this inspection, we looked in depth at reading, mathematics, Spanish, music and geography. The ambitious, well-planned curriculum provides pupils with the knowledge and skills they need to be successful in their learning. Pupils achieve very well from their starting points, including those with SEND.

p.2

Context

The teaching of reading is strong from the start of the Reception Year. Staff are experts in delivering the phonics programme. This ensures that children can read effectively from an early age. They make sure that all pupils are well supported, including those with SEND. Reading books are well matched to the letters and sounds that pupils know. Pupils’ achievement in the phonics screening check in Year 1 is very high. Older pupils continue to develop their reading skills as they move through the school. A highly effective reading programme ensures that they achieve very well, allowing them to access the full curriculum on offer. Adults read to pupils daily, enabling them to develop a real love of reading.

p.2

Context

The teaching of mathematics is highly effective. Pupils achieve very well in this subject. Learning is well planned and is adapted to meet the needs of all pupils. Mathematics journals are used effectively to extend pupils’ learning, developing their knowledge and skills to help them solve complex problems.

p.2

Context

Across all programmes of study, teachers use their excellent subject knowledge to make sure that pupils build on their knowledge and skills over time. Specialist teachers in music and Spanish provide very well planned series of lessons. Pupils are provided with regular opportunities to revisit prior learning so that it becomes embedded in their long-term memory.

p.2

Context

There is a strong culture of safeguarding in this school. Leaders make sure that all staff are well trained to recognise the signs that pupils may be at risk of harm. Staff know how to raise concerns. Leaders make sure that the most vulnerable pupils and their families receive the help they need whenever possible. They follow up any concerns they have with a range of outside agencies.

p.2

Context

Pupils have very positive attitudes to learning and their behaviour is strong. They can manage their own behaviour very well. Older pupils take responsibility for helping younger pupils by helping organise playground games. The school is an extremely calm and orderly environment.

p.3

Context

The school’s rich provision of extra-curricular learning is of high quality. Leaders make sure that pupils, including disadvantaged and pupils with SEND, can broaden their horizons including academically and through sport.

p.3

Context

Pupils’ personal development is very well catered for in this school. Pupils have a strong understanding of different religious groups, cultures and beliefs. They show a mature knowledge of different types of families. They are tolerant and respectful of how others live in our society. Pupils typically say that everyone should be treated equally. Pupils are well prepared for life in modern Britain.

p.3

Context

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, the chief executive officer of the multi-academy trust, the chair of the local governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Newham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion