Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Haydock High School

Inspected 9 Oct 2019 · published 17 Dec 2019 · URN 104827

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    9 Oct 2019

  • Inspectors verified

    Craig Yates, Dympna Woods, Emma Gregory, Stephanie Gill

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    WA11 0JG

  • Name on report verified

    Haydock High School

  • URN verified

    104827

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+3Mixedmore positive than 85% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseimprovedsuccessfulsuccessfullysafeambitiousfeel safepoliteimproving
Criticismconcernslimitedpoorat risktoo oftennot ambitiousgapsharm

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1145w+15
  • Safeguarding128w−30

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,235
shorter than usual (typical 1552)
Reading level
Plain English
Flesch 63, typical 53
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
6
typical 6
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%Safeguarding 7%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Inspection of Haydock High School Clipsley Lane, Haydock, St Helens, Merseyside WA11 0JG

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement 8–9 October 2019

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Older pupils told us that the range of subjects on offer for key stage 4 study is too limited. They said that leaders insist that pupils have to do some subjects that they do not like or feel will help them in the future. We found this to be the case.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils behave well. They get on well together and say that they feel safe. The school is calm and orderly. Pupils move around the buildings sensibly. They are polite and friendly.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

In lessons, pupils get on with their work and do what teachers ask of them. Pupils say that since the new headteacher has arrived, behaviour has improved a lot. This is because teachers have higher expectations. They no longer accept bad behaviour. Pupils like the rewards that they get when they behave well.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils say that bullying is rare. If it does happen, they say that adults will deal with it. Adults work hard to ensure that pupils are well cared for.

p.2

better?

Leaders have introduced a curriculum that does not meet the needs of pupils well enough. In Year 9, pupils start their GCSE and vocational courses. This reduces the number of academic subjects that they study. Teachers teach a broad range of topics to pupils in key stage 3. However, there are some gaps in pupils’ knowledge and understanding in some subject areas.

p.2

better?

The choice of academic GCSE courses available to pupils in key stage 4 is too narrow. The curriculum offer for pupils from Year 9 is not ambitious enough. It does not give pupils the opportunity to develop the depth and breadth of knowledge and skills that they need to be successful in life. This is particularly the case for disadvantaged pupils and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). For example, more than half of pupils are not able to study a language at GCSE. Neither are they able to study both history and geography.

p.2

better?

All pupils study English, mathematics and science. Beyond this, more than half of pupils can only choose from a maximum of two GCSEs. Pupils in Years 9, 10 and 11 have to study vocational courses, regardless of their needs, interests or aspirations. For example, leaders make all pupils in Year 11 study a vocational course in animal care. All pupils in Year 10 have to study a vocational sports science course. Pupils are prevented from gaining qualifications that may be useful to them in the future. Leaders’ poor decisions to make all pupils study these courses are not in pupils’ educational best interest.

p.2

better?

Most curriculum plans make it clear to teachers what they should teach and in what order. For example, in history, leaders have chosen topics so that pupils gain a broad knowledge of how British society and values have developed over time. In science, leaders are developing new curriculum plans to improve the way that pupils build 8–9 October 2019

p.2

3

In many subjects, pupils are learning more and remembering more. This is helping some pupils to make better progress in subjects such as history and English. In mathematics, leaders have improved the way that learning is sequenced. Pupils now have more opportunities to revisit prior learning. However, despite this, pupils still do not achieve well enough in this subject.

p.3

3

Leaders have successfully improved pupils’ behaviour. Pupils now behave well. This helps everyone’s learning. Leaders want pupils to develop their wider skills, such as resilience and cooperation. Staff provide pupils with lots of opportunities to do this. In assemblies, pupils learn about the school’s values of respect, tolerance, trust and honesty.

p.3

3

Pupils’ attendance is improving, but some pupils are away from school too often. Disadvantaged pupils and those pupils with SEND miss too much school.

p.3

3

Staff who work with pupils in the specially resourced provision have built a curriculum that helps each individual pupil to be successful. Pupils with SEND in the rest of the school have more of a mixed experience. Some pupils learn well. Others do not because teachers do not adapt their plans to meet pupils’ needs.

p.3

3

In the past, leaders removed a significant number of pupils from the school roll when it was not in pupils’ best interests. This constitutes off-rolling by Ofsted’s definition. As a result, information about these pupils was not included in the published data about how well pupils are doing in the school. Removing pupils from the register in this way meant that those pupils were less likely to be safe and successful. This practice has now stopped.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders ensure that all the required checks are carried out when new staff are appointed. Leaders are well trained in safeguarding. They work hard to make sure that pupils are as safe as possible. Staff work with support agencies outside the school to provide help to pupils as soon as they need it and to support pupils at risk of harm. Staff are vigilant. They know what to do if they have any concerns about a pupil. Staff keep careful records of these concerns and incidents. Pupils learn how to keep themselves safe. They know how to pass on any worries that they have about themselves or others. Leaders ensure that those pupils who attend alternative provision are safe. 8–9 October 2019

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Leaders have not made sure that the curriculum is ambitious enough for all pupils. At key stage 4, academic GCSE subject choices for more than half of pupils are too limited. Leaders should ensure that all pupils are able to study a wider range of subjects, including more GCSE qualifications. They must ensure that all pupils are able to study a language if they wish.  Leaders are systematically entering pupils for courses at key stage 4 that do not match pupils’ interests and aspirations. Leaders must ensure that pupils are not entered for courses which are not in their educational best interest.  Pupils do not achieve well enough across a number of subjects. This is particularly the case in mathematics. Leaders need to evaluate the impact of their curriculum planning on pupils’ progress. Curriculum leaders must ensure that the way that teachers sequence learning helps pupils to know more and remember more.

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Some teachers do not use the school’s accurate and detailed information about pupils with SEND as well as they should. Leaders and teachers should use information about pupils with SEND to ensure that these pupils can access the curriculum successfully.  Pupils’ attendance has improved. However, the attendance of disadvantaged pupils and those with SEND remains low. Persistent absence is also still too high. Leaders should continue to work to improve attendance, with a particular focus on improving the attendance of these groups.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you're not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 8–9 October 2019

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10087807 Type of school Secondary comprehensive

p.5

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 28–29 March 2017

p.5

Information about this school

 The school uses six alternative providers for some pupils in key stage 4. These providers are Launchpad, Aspire Training Services, ATM Training, Encouragement Through Sport, Merit Training and MPH Training.  The school has a specially resourced provision for pupils with moderate learning difficulties.

p.5

Information about this inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. In accordance with section 44(2) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than it might in all the circumstances reasonably be expected to perform.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 We closely examined the school’s work in the following subjects: mathematics, science, history and modern foreign languages. This involved meetings with subject leaders, visits to samples of lessons in these subjects, work scrutiny of books and other kinds of work produced by pupils who were part of classes 8–9 October 2019

p.5

6

observed by inspectors, and discussions with teachers and with groups of pupils from the lessons visited.  We visited lessons in a wider range of subjects on the second day of the inspection and met with subject leaders of art, design and technology, and geography. Many of the visits to lessons were carried out jointly with leaders.  Meetings were held with senior and subject leaders, teachers, governors and representatives of the local authority.  We visited the school’s specially resourced provision for pupils with moderate learning difficulties.  We held discussions with many pupils and observed interactions during social times.  We visited form times and an assembly.  We observed the work of the school and scrutinised a wide range of evidence, including the school’s self-evaluation, action plans and evaluations, attendance and behaviour records, safeguarding records and recruitment checks.  We took into account the 63 responses from parents and carers who had

p.6

6

completed Parent View, Ofsted’s online questionnaire. We also considered the 73 responses from staff and the 42 responses from pupils to the online surveys.

p.6

Inspection team

Stephanie Gill, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Emma Gregory Her Majesty’s Inspector 8–9 October 2019

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion