Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Ellowes Hall Sports College

Inspected 13 Nov 2019 · published 13 Dec 2019 · URN 141570

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    13 Nov 2019

  • Inspectors verified

    Caroline Hoddinott, Helen Reeves, Julie Griffiths, Nigel Griffiths, Phil Lloyd

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    DY3 2JH

  • Name on report verified

    Ellowes Hall Sports College

  • URN verified

    141570

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−32Criticalmore positive than 6% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseambitiousvery wellstrongfeel safesafeenjoymentenjoyproud
Criticismnot good enoughweakweaknessestoo manyweaknessnot consistentlytoo oftenconcern

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1155w−46
  • Safeguarding108w+44
  • What needs to improve33w—

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,256
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 56, typical 56
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%Safeguarding 6%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 29%

Full report text

Inspection of Ellowes Hall Sports College Stickley Lane, Lower Gornal, Dudley, West Midlands DY3 2JH

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Sixth-form provision Good Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Not previously inspected 12–13 November 2019

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The quality of education is not good enough. There is too much variation in the effectiveness of the curriculum in different subjects. This has led to some groups of pupils’ progress being weak in key subjects. Leaders are taking too long to put things right. Leaders’ expectations are not consistently high in all areas of the school’s work.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Relationships between pupils and teachers are purposeful and relaxed. Inspectors saw mainly good behaviour in lessons and at social times. Pupils are less positive and say poor behaviour too often disrupts lessons. This is also a concern for some teachers.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Most pupils say they like the school. They say bullying is very rare and always resolved. Pupils feel safe and are safe. Some pupils’ attendance is not as good as it should be. Disadvantaged pupils and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are excluded more frequently than other pupils.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

There is a wide range of school clubs and activities, especially in sports and the arts. Pupils appreciate these, and most take up the opportunities on offer. This improves their self-confidence, development of skills and enjoyment of the school. Inspectors saw rehearsals for the forthcoming school production of ‘Miss Saigon’.

p.2

better?

School leaders are not ambitious enough for what pupils can achieve. They are too slow to acknowledge and tackle weaknesses. Leaders do not target their work precisely enough to make the necessary improvements. Governors and the chief executive officer of the Invictus Education Trust have a more realistic view. They are concerned that standards have declined over time. Governors have not challenged leaders sufficiently. Leaders of the trust acknowledge that their support has lacked impact and there is much to do.

p.2

better?

There is a lack of joined-up thinking about the curriculum. This leads to variability in planning and teaching across departments. Pupils’ knowledge and skills do not build well enough year on year. They do not achieve as well as possible. This is particularly the case for disadvantaged pupils and pupils who have SEND.

p.2

better?

Some pupils do not have their full entitlement to a broad and ambitious education. This is because, in Year 9, pupils study either geography or history. A minority do not study modern foreign languages.

p.2

better?

In some subjects, there is no clarity about what pupils should learn step by step. In French, pupils copy out far too much work without understanding it. Pupils in key stage 3 cannot recall basic vocabulary and phrases. Year 11 pupils told inspectors they did not have ‘the building blocks’ to succeed in languages. 12–13 November 2019

p.2

3

In mathematics, the work in pupils’ books is not always well presented. Pupils with SEND cannot use what they have learned in mathematics to support their work in science.

p.3

3

In physical education (PE), teachers plan a series of tasks rather than planning learning so that pupils build their skills over time.

p.3

3

Teachers’ planning in English is stronger. They reinforce the essential skills pupils need. Pupils enjoy the books and poems they read and the opportunities they have to develop speaking and listening skills. Teachers say they receive good training and share resources to reduce their workload. Pupils achieve well in English because they remember key knowledge and produce good work.

p.3

3

Too many pupils are often absent, especially disadvantaged pupils and pupils with SEND. These pupils have been excluded more than their peers in the past. This has had a negative impact on their achievement.

p.3

3

Leaders place pupils’ personal development at the centre of learning. There is a variety of extra-curricular opportunities which stretch pupils’ talents and interests. Additionally, there is a range of positions of responsibility available to pupils. They can, for example, become prefects, house captains and anti-bullying ambassadors. Pupils are proud to wear a different uniform that recognises their position in the school. The provision for careers guidance at key stages 3 and 4 is strong. Pupils speak highly of the wider opportunities the school provides.

p.3

3

There are 26 students in the sixth form. There is a broad range of courses on offer, as the school shares provision with six other schools. Students’ learning is supported effectively, and they achieve well. For example, in accounts and forensic science, students’ past, current and future learning is mapped out. There are enrichment and careers activities, for example work-experience opportunities, university visits and additional courses such as a public-speaking qualification. These help students prepare for the next stage of their education, employment or training. Students would welcome increased careers advice and guidance.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Safeguarding is given the highest priority. Leaders are knowledgeable about pupils, the local area and agencies from whom they can draw support. There are robust employment checks on adults working at the school. Staff, including those in the school canteen, can explain the safeguarding training they receive and how to pass on concerns.

p.3

Safeguarding

Pupils learn how to keep safe, including online and outside the school. There is a structured citizenship programme. This tackles issues including the dangers of gangs and extremism. Inspectors saw the school’s anti-bullying ambassadors deliver an 12–13 November 2019

p.3

4

effective assembly. This was very well received by other pupils.

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 School leaders do not have a realistic and critical view of the performance of the school. Consequently, they cannot act swiftly to address issues when required. Improvement planning to address areas of weakness needs to be more sharply focused on the key issues. Governors and the trust need to give stronger challenge and support to ensure that the school improves.  The curriculum plans in some subjects are not logically sequenced nor delivered well. As a result, pupils are not able to develop the breadth and depth of knowledge they need, particularly in mathematics, modern foreign languages and PE. Leaders need greater clarity about how the school’s overall curriculum will support the aspirations they have for young people now and in the future. At key stage 3, leaders should ensure that all pupils benefit from a curriculum as ambitious as that outlined in the national curriculum.  Teachers vary in their skills at adapting the curriculum to meet all pupils’ needs.

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

Consequently, disadvantaged pupils and pupils with SEND struggle to keep up. They do not achieve as highly as others. Teachers need to meet pupils’ needs, and help them remember previous learning and apply this to their current work.  Many pupils and some teachers feel that too many lessons are disrupted by poor behaviour. Leaders need to ensure that low-level disruption is addressed. Both internal and external exclusions of disadvantaged pupils and pupils with SEND must reduce.  Disadvantaged pupils and those with SEND do not attend school regularly enough. They are missing out on their education and are underachieving. Leaders need to review and change their strategies to increase these pupils’ attendance.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you’re not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government 12–13 November 2019

p.4

5

pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 12–13 November 2019

p.5

School details

Inspection number 10088616 Type of school Secondary Comprehensive

p.6

provision

Number of pupils on the school roll 1114

p.6

sixth form

Chair of the board of trustees Geoffrey Marsh

p.6

sixth form

Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.6

Information about this school

 The school joined the Invictus Education Trust in 2015. The predecessor school was inspected in November 2012 and was judged to be outstanding.  The school shares its sixth form with six other schools in the Invictus Sixth Form.  The school does not make use of alternative provision currently.

p.6

Information about this inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We deemed the inspection a section 5 inspection under the same Act.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors met with the headteacher; several other members of the school’s senior leadership team; the special educational needs coordinator; curriculum leaders; and teachers and support staff.  The lead inspector met with the chair of the local governing board and had a 12–13 November 2019

p.6

7

telephone conversation with the vice chair of this board. The lead inspector also met the chief executive officer of the Invictus Education Trust.  Inspectors spoke with many pupils and sixth-form students formally and informally throughout the course of the inspection.  Inspectors took account of 75 responses to Ofsted’s online survey Parent View.  Inspectors focused on English, mathematics, modern foreign languages and PE. Inspectors considered the school’s curriculum, including subject plans, visited lessons and scrutinised pupils’ work. Inspectors met with pupils to discuss their learning and with teachers in these subjects. Inspectors also visited lessons in other subjects, for example science, history, art and geography, including in the sixth form.  When inspecting safeguarding, inspectors looked at the school’s procedures for recruiting staff. Inspectors also met with staff to consider the impact of training,

p.7

7

and the procedures that are in place to keep pupils safe.  The inspection team reviewed a range of documentation, including curriculum plans, the school improvement plan and records on attendance and behaviour. During the inspection, leaders corrected information on the website, following a discussion with the lead inspector.

p.7

Inspection team

Nigel Griffiths, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Caroline Hoddinott Ofsted Inspector 12–13 November 2019

p.7

8

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion