Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Leavesden JMI School

Inspected 20 Nov 2019 · URN 117324

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Steve Mellors

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    20 Nov 2019

  • Inspectors verified

    Steve Mellors

  • Postcode verified

    WD25 7QZ

  • Name on report verified

    Leavesden JMI School

  • URN verified

    117324

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−13Mixedmore positive than 8% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveinspirationalhigh expectationseffectivelyoutstandingaccuratelystrongpolite
Criticismconcernsdecliningtoo lowgapsdo not knownot effectivenot consistentlystruggle

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1276w−17
  • Safeguarding104w+9

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,373
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 60, typical 55
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 70%Safeguarding 6%About the inspection 24%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Leavesden JMI School High Road, Leavesden, Watford, Hertfordshire WD25 7QZ

p.1

Outcome

Leavesden JMI School continues to be a good school. However, inspectors have some concerns that standards may be declining, as set out below.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are well-mannered and polite. They are calm and orderly when they walk around the building. Pupils make good use of play equipment and readily share games and activities. Pupils generally behave well in class. However, on a few occasions, there is some chatting while the teacher talks. Not all teachers insist that pupils listen and pay attention.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The headteacher has made new appointments to senior leadership roles. Together, senior leaders are setting high expectations for pupils’ achievement. In recent years, standards have been too low. There have been a lot of staff changes. This has affected how well pupils have achieved. The new approaches leaders have introduced are at their early stages. They are not used consistently well by all teachers across the school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils feel safe in school. They told me that Leavesden Junior and Mixed Infant School is a friendly place. Pupils understand about the different forms bullying can take. They told me it was rare in their school. Pupils were confident that if it did happen, adults would support them to resolve any concerns.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

New senior leaders have made a good start. They have accurately identified what needs to improve and made some changes. It is too early to see of the difference that these changes are making. Teaching is not consistently strong across the school. Some teachers do not understand how to deliver leaders’ plans for the curriculum well.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Standards in reading are too low, especially at the end of key stage 1. Not all teachers are experts in teaching phonics. They do not check that pupils blend sounds accurately. Books do not challenge the most able readers. Pupils who struggle with reading do not have enough opportunities to practise their skills. This hampers their fluency and confidence. 19–20 November 2019

p.1

2

The mathematics curriculum is now addressing gaps in pupils’ learning. Teachers organise learning that builds on what pupils already know. For example, pupils in Year 6 discussed how their work on finding percentages starts with knowing table facts and fractions. Teachers address gaps in pupils’ knowledge through additional teaching sessions. This is particularly effective for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Pupils with SEND are starting to catch up with their peers.

p.2

2

Leaders are currently developing the curriculum for all subjects. In history and geography, topics are carefully planned. They build pupils’ understanding of key concepts. For example, pupils learn about inspirational figures such as Ernest Shackleton. They make connections in their learning through ideas of travel, exploration and polar regions. There is still more work to do. Plans for other foundation subjects do not show the order in which pupils learn about different things. Not all teachers address pupils’ misconceptions. Many of these subjects do not have any leaders. Senior leaders do not know whether these subjects are taught effectively.

p.2

2

Disadvantaged pupils have not achieved well over time. Leaders’ strategies have not paid close enough attention to the needs of disadvantaged pupils. This has changed. New leaders’ plans are well targeted and beginning to show some success. For example, pupils’ attendance is improving owing to regular meetings with parents and carers and the tracking of attendance. However, it remains too early to see how well disadvantaged pupils are making progress across the curriculum.

p.2

2

In the early years, children are happy and safe. I saw children mixing well with one another and with adults. Leaders plan activities that address all areas of children’s development. For example, themes from a book support children’s counting, speaking and social skills.

p.2

2

However, some adults do not use all activities as well as they are intended. Where teaching is less effective, the purpose of learning is not clear. Children do not sustain their concentration and flit between activities. The learning environment does not provide enough challenge for children’s curiosity or thinking.

p.2

2

Pupils enjoy a range of trips and activities. They speak enthusiastically about visits that link to the things they are learning. For example, pupils visited London to see where the ‘Great Fire’ had started. Pupils recall the school’s umbrella values. They provide examples of where they have shown respect, courage and determination during their time at school. This helps to support the inclusive nature of the school.

p.2

2

Governors understand the weaknesses of the school. They are working with the local authority to help the school improve. Governors visit the school to check that the information they receive from leaders is accurate.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. 19–20 November 2019

p.2

3

Leaders ensure that there is a rigorous approach to keeping pupils safe. Staff receive regular training to check their understanding of safeguarding systems and policies. Adults know how to recognise the signs and report that pupils may be at risk of harm. The school’s family worker provides effective support for families. Leaders work with external agencies to ensure that pupils are offered the help they need.

p.3

3

The records for checking the suitability of staff and those that visit the school are well maintained. They are regularly checked to ensure that they are up to date.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The curriculum plans for most foundation subjects have not been developed. Subject leadership is at an early stage of implementation. Teachers do not know what pupils need to learn at key points and stages. Leaders do not know how well pupils are developing their knowledge in different subjects. This means that pupils are not achieving as well as they should. Leaders should ensure that all subject plans include well-ordered content. They need to ensure that teachers understand how to plan lessons in a logical sequence and that curriculum leaders are well trained.  Some teachers do not understand how to implement leaders’ plans effectively. Where teaching is less effective, teachers do not check what pupils have learned or address misconceptions. This leads to gaps in pupils’ understanding and knowledge. Leaders must provide training and support so that teaching is consistently strong across the school, including the early years.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Not all teachers understand how to teach phonics well. Some pupils do not have books that challenge their reading abilities. Those that struggle to read do not practise regularly. Pupils do not achieve well in their reading at key stage 1. Leaders need to ensure that all teachers are experts in teaching phonics and pupils read accurately and fluently by the end of key stage 1.  Strategies for supporting disadvantaged pupils have not been effective. Disadvantaged pupils have not achieved well across the school. Leaders should ensure that the developing curriculum addresses the needs of disadvantaged pupils so that their progress is accelerated.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called a section 8 inspection of a good school or non-exempt outstanding school. We do not give graded judgements on a section 8 inspection. However, if we find some evidence that the school could now be better than good or that standards may be declining, then the next inspection will be a section 5 inspection. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the section 8 inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will convert the section 8 inspection to a section 5 inspection immediately. 19–20 November 2019

p.3

4

This is the first section 8 inspection since we judged the school to be good on 23–24 February 2016.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 19–20 November 2019

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10110284 Type of school Primary

p.5

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 23–24 February 2016

p.5

Information about this school

 Leavesden Junior and Mixed Infant School has ongoing building work to create additional classrooms for a two-form entry school.  The school runs and manages a breakfast club and an after-school club.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 I met with the headteacher, school leaders, including the special educational needs coordinator and the leader of the pupil premium, and school staff. I held discussions with members of the governing body, including the chair of governors, and a representative of the local authority.  The subjects considered as part of this inspection were early reading, mathematics and history. In each subject, I visited lessons, looked at the work in pupils’ books and held discussions with subject leaders, teachers and pupils.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, I reviewed school policies, procedures and records. A meeting was held with two designated safeguarding leaders, including the family support worker, to review examples of actions taken to keep pupils safe. I also checked staff’s knowledge of how to keep pupils safe from harm.  I spoke with parents as they arrived at school with their children. I also considered the

p.5

6

53 responses to Parent View, Ofsted’s online questionnaire, including 48 free-text messages. I scrutinised the 18 responses to the staff online survey. I spoke with pupils informally during lunchtime and when they were in classes.

p.6

Inspection team

Steve Mellors, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector 19–20 November 2019

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.leavesden.education .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion