Summary
Phillip Morris (lead), Joanne Vyas
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
21 Nov 2019
- Inspectorssingle source
Joanne Vyas, Phillip Morris
- Postcode verified
NG31 9AP
- Name on report verified
Grantham College
- URN verified
SC039105
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Ensure that the college’s designated safeguarding lead and their deputies undertake the required training every two years in line with ‘Keeping children safe in education’, September 2019. p.2
- Leaders should ensure that the manager who has day-to-day responsibility for the residential provision has the required qualification. p.2
- Leaders and managers should ensure, in line with their policies and procedures, that staff have received the requisite training to provide supervision to young people in the residential areas. p.2
- Leaders and managers should ensure that written records have an increased focus on the welfare of young people. p.2
- Leaders should consider strengthening the college’s employment policy in relation to the process for taking up references for prospective employees in the residential areas, to reflect statutory guidance. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance17
“The leadership team is strong and effective.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 1,096
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 36, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for further education college with residential accommodation: Grantham College 1 Grantham College Stonebridge Road, Grantham, Lincolnshire NG31 9AP Inspection of residential provision Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
residential accommodation
Grantham College provides further, higher and adult education courses. Residential accommodation for young people who are under 18 consists of 46 en-suite bedrooms in a purpose-built accommodation block. At the time of inspection, 17 residents were under 18 years old.
p.1
residential accommodation
Inspection dates: 19 to 21 November 2019
p.1
good
How well young people are helped and protected good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers good
p.1
good
The college provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: requires improvement to be good
p.1
good
Date of last inspection: 30 January 2018 Inspection report for further education college with residential accommodation: Grantham College 2
p.1
Recommendations
Ensure that the college’s designated safeguarding lead and their deputies undertake the required training every two years in line with ‘Keeping children safe in education’, September 2019. (Linked to NMS 11.2) Leaders should ensure that the manager who has day-to-day responsibility for the residential provision has the required qualification. (Linked to NMS 13.3) Leaders and managers should ensure, in line with their policies and procedures, that staff have received the requisite training to provide supervision to young people in the residential areas. (Linked to NMS 15.5) Leaders and managers should ensure that written records have an increased focus on the welfare of young people. (Linked to NMS 13.8, appendix 2) Leaders should consider strengthening the college’s employment policy in relation to the process for taking up references for prospective employees in the residential areas, to reflect statutory guidance. (Linked to ‘Keeping children safe in education’,
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of young people: good
Young people are very happy. They make friends quickly and enjoy a wide range of stimulating and fun activities. Young people make good progress on their chosen course of study, often better progress than the wider student population. Young people are well supported by college staff.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of young people: good
Staff provide a comprehensive induction programme to help young people become acquainted with wider college life and adapt to living in residence. This helps young people settle quickly and start to make progress. Staff undertake a careful assessment of young people’s abilities and skills, identifying additional support that might be required.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of young people: good
Young people enjoy and benefit from good relationships with staff. Young people can turn to staff for advice, support and guidance. Staff work effectively, in partnership with specialist agencies, to ensure that young people receive the help that they need to address emotional and mental health issues.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of young people: good
Staff respect young people’s diversity and individuality. Difference is celebrated. Young people receive very good support when making choices around sexuality and gender. This helps young people to grow in confidence.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of young people: good
The residential accommodation is much improved since the last inspection. Residential areas have been refurbished. There is a better standard of decoration, especially in the kitchen areas. Young people like their rooms. They also enjoy the wider college Inspection report for further education college with residential accommodation: Grantham College 3 resources, such the gym. Leaders and managers have better oversight of the accommodation, so any problems are quickly rectified.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of young people: good
There are regular ‘student voice’ meetings at which young people can express any concerns about the residence or wider college life. Staff and managers listen and respond to young people’s views. For example, problems with internet connection have been addressed.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of young people: good
The implementation of an electronic recording system has improved the standard of record-keeping. Records are now easily accessible and easier to understand. Recording would be further strengthened with more emphasis on recording information pertaining to young people’s welfare as opposed domestic tasks.
p.3
How well young people are helped and protected: good
Young people are safe and they feel safe. Residential areas are secure and welcoming. There is always sufficient adult supervision of the residences.
p.3
How well young people are helped and protected: good
Staff set clear behavioural expectations, as any responsible carer would. For example, night-time curfews are strictly enforced. The behaviour of young people is generally good. They understand the rules. Appropriate disciplinary action is taken when rules are broken. When staff have concerns about the behaviour of young people, they communicate with parents to rectify problems quickly.
p.3
How well young people are helped and protected: good
Leaders, managers and staff have developed a strong safeguarding culture in the residential accommodation. The college’s safeguarding team ensures that any safeguarding concerns are referred to appropriate agencies immediately. Managers are always available to provide advice to residential staff if safeguarding issues emerge.
p.3
How well young people are helped and protected: good
The designated safeguarding team meets on a regular basis to share information and review any concerns. Staff and managers have undertaken the required safeguarding training and understand their safeguarding roles well. However, the college policy in relation to the frequency of training does not reflect the expectation, set out in statutory guidance, that training of designated safeguarding leads should take place every two years.
p.3
How well young people are helped and protected: good
Young people do not engage in drug or alcohol use in the residential areas. Relationships between young people are good. There is no bullying. Young people are respectful of each other. This means that the residential areas are calm and settled and that young people develop strong friendships.
p.3
How well young people are helped and protected: good
Young people are provided with a comprehensive health and safety briefing during their induction. Additionally, senior managers complete unannounced site visits to ensure that health and safety measures are adhered to. Fire risk assessments are completed, and evacuations practised regularly.
p.3
How well young people are helped and protected: good
College leaders should consider strengthening the employment policy, to provide clarity Inspection report for further education college with residential accommodation: Grantham College 4 about reference checks for prospective new employees. This will provide leaders with reassurance that their policy is in line with statutory guidance.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The leadership team is strong and effective. They took decisive action to meet the recommendations made at the last inspection. As a result, there has been a marked improvement in the residential accommodation.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Governors provide effective scrutiny, support and challenge. Governors regularly visit the residence and speak to the young people. A governor attends the ‘student voice’ meetings. This ensures that governors have a good understanding of the residential provision and the challenges and vulnerabilities of residential students.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Leaders undertake effective quality assurance audits and seek the views of young people, their families and other stakeholders. Leaders take prompt action to address any weakness that is identified.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Staff training is good. Staff undertake a broad range of relevant courses that support them to provide good care for young people. However, the manager with day-to-day responsibility for the boarding provision does not yet have the required qualification. Additionally, in line with the college policy, leaders should consider how they can ensure that all staff working in residence complete an appropriate care qualification.
p.4
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of young people. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the differences made to the lives of young people. They watched how professional staff work with young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care provided. Wherever possible, they talked to young people and their families. In addition, the inspectors have tried to understand what the college knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the young people whom it is trying to help, protect and look after.
p.4
Information about this inspection
Using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’, this inspection was carried out under the Children Act 1989 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the national minimum standards. Inspection report for further education college with residential accommodation: Grantham College 5
p.4
details
Social care unique reference number: SC039105 Principal/CEO: Paul Deane
p.5
Inspectors
Phillip Morris, social care inspector Joanne Vyas, social care inspector Inspection report for further education college with residential accommodation: Grantham College 6 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.5
Inspectors
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.6
Inspectors
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.6
Inspectors
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion