Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 14 Nov 2019 · published 10 Dec 2019

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Daniel Burton

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    14 Nov 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Daniel Burton

  • Postcode verified

    NW10 9LS

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+90Very positivemore positive than 97% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandinghighly effectivehigh expectationswell-ledclearstrongeffectivelystrengths

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
794
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Dawn Titus Headteacher St Joseph’s Roman Catholic Primary School Goodson Road London NW10 9LS

p.1

Subject inspection of St Joseph’s Roman Catholic Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 14 November 2019, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. The findings do not change the overall effectiveness judgement of outstanding from the last section 5 inspection.

p.1

Subject inspection of St Joseph’s Roman Catholic Primary School

This inspection was conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for a no formal designation inspection of schools. The inspection was carried out to enable Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector to better understand the quality of education in specific subjects provided by outstanding primary schools.

p.1

Main findings

You and your staff have worked hard and effectively to devise a history curriculum which has considerable strengths. Two years ago, you took the decision to teach history and the other foundation subjects discretely. This was because you found that the topic-based approach to learning you previously used did not provide pupils with sufficient subject knowledge. The changes have made a real difference to the quality of pupils’ learning in history. They have ensured that pupils develop deep and wide-ranging subject knowledge. The older pupils appreciate these changes. They told me that they now know much more about history and enjoy it far more than they used to.

p.1

Main findings

The subject is well-led by your highly effective subject leader. Staff receive very precise guidance on what pupils should know, understand and be able to do by the end of each history topic. They are also given clear information about what pupils have previously learned so that they can build on the knowledge already accrued. Staff regularly remind pupils about their previous learning and test their knowledge through careful questioning and low-stakes quizzes. They have high expectations of what pupils should know and remember. In the lessons I visited, Year 1 pupils remembered when Queen Victoria reigned and could say how long ago she lived. Pupils in Year 4 could recall important information about the Roman Empire even though they have not studied Ancient Rome since Year 3. Pupils in Year 6 have impressive knowledge and understanding of the First World War. They could explain in some depth the causes of the war, conditions on the Western Front and the

p.1

Main findings

The curriculum places strong emphasis on developing pupils’ chronological knowledge. Pupils regularly complete timelines so they can place the period they are studying in their broader historical context. The timeline in the school hall helps pupils to understand the sequence and duration of the different periods of history they have learned about. The curriculum also encourages pupils to respect historical evidence. Older pupils can explain how historians build a picture of the past by looking at and aggregating different types of evidence. They realise it is important to consider a wide range of evidence before drawing conclusions about the past. Leaders introduce concepts such as evidential validity judiciously.

p.2

Main findings

The very clear curriculum plans result in teaching which is focused on clear and valid historical objectives. Staff work well together in their phases to ensure that all pupils experience a history curriculum of the same quality regardless of which class they are in. This includes pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Pupils regularly write accurate and detailed historical narratives, for example about Anglo-Saxon life. Their learning is enriched by visits to places such as the British Museum and Windsor Castle. The curriculum does not provide enough opportunities for pupils to write analytically, however. Leaders now need to develop ways to build further pupils’ understanding of history by increasing opportunities for pupils to address historically valid questions about change, cause, similarity and difference, and significance.

p.2

Evidence

I met with you and your deputy headteacher, the subject leader for history and other teachers. I visited lessons in Years 1, 4 and 6 and spoke to pupils from the Year 4 and Year 6 classes about their work in history. I also looked at a range of pupils’ work, including the work produced by the pupils whose lessons I visited. I scrutinised the curriculum plans in history.

p.2

Context

The school is larger than the average-sized primary school. The large majority of pupils are from minority ethnic backgrounds. The proportion of pupils eligible for free school meals is higher than average. The proportion of pupils with SEND is above average. The school was refurbished following a major fire in September 2015. Pupils and staff returned to the school’s permanent buildings in September 2018.

p.2

Context

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Brent. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion