Schools & FE · Independent school inspection
Michael Hall School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
20 Nov 2019
- Inspectors verified
Lee Selby
- Postcode verified
RH18 5JA
- Name on report verified
Michael Hall School
- URN verified
114625
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, progress since the previous inspection has been too slow and pupils are continuing to underachieve because of weak teaching. p.2
- At the time of the previous inspection there were weaknesses in the school’s curriculum and assessment policy and practice. p.1
- The school’s assessment framework was also judged to be ineffective. p.1
- At the time of the previous inspection teaching was found to be inadequate, although there were some strengths in the kindergarten and sixth form. p.1
- Substantial weaknesses in the leadership of teaching and learning were found at the time of the previous inspection. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school does not meet the requirements of the schedule to The Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014 (‘the independent school standards’) and associated requirements that were checked during this inspection, as set out in the annex of this report. p.5
- This included the standards and requirements that the school was judged to not comply with at the previous inspection. p.5
- Not all of the standards and associated requirements were checked during this inspection. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,159
- about usual (typical 1813)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 49
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
School progress monitoring inspection report
p.1
Michael Hall School Kidbrooke Park, Priory Road, Forest Row, East Sussex RH18 5JA
p.1
Main inspection findings
Part 1. Quality of education provided Paragraph 2(1)(b), 2(1)(b)(i), 2(2)(a), 2(2)(b), 4 At the time of the previous inspection there were weaknesses in the school’s curriculum and assessment policy and practice. The curriculum policy, plans, and schemes of work did not take enough account of pupils’ ages and needs, including the needs of any pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). The school’s assessment framework was also judged to be ineffective. Leaders planned to review the curriculum policy and schemes of work and audit the provision for pupils with SEND. Leaders also planned to work with the Steiner Waldorf Schools Fellowship (SWSF) to develop a consistent approach to assessment across the school. The curriculum policy is now fit for purpose and meets all of the requirements outlined in the independent school standards. It explains how pupils’ different starting points will be
p.1
Main inspection findings
taken in to account and how the curriculum includes all the required areas. The curriculum policy explains the ambition for pupils with SEND to do well. This provision has been audited and pupils with SEND are now receiving more effective support in class, rather than being withdrawn for catch-up work. Leaders responsible for pupils with SEND are supporting teachers to enable them to adapt their teaching to meet the needs of pupils with SEND. A consistent system of planning and assessment (known by staff as ‘purple folders’) has been introduced across the main school. This system has been devised with the SWSF and is already helping teachers to make sure the content of the new schemes of work is covered. It also allows teachers to assess how well pupils are progressing through these schemes. Leaders are helping teachers to work together to moderate the accuracy of these assessments. Leaders have ensured that these standards are now met.
p.1
Main inspection findings
Paragraph 2(1), 2(1)(a), 2(2)(h), 3, 3(a), 3(c), 3(d), 3(e), 3(g) At the time of the previous inspection teaching was found to be inadequate, although there were some strengths in the kindergarten and sixth form. As a result, there were unmet standards relating to teaching because it did not enable all pupils to learn and make progress. The action plan outlined how staff would receive additional training and how the quality of teaching would be regularly monitored by leaders. Leaders planned to raise expectations about the quality of teaching in the main school. Strengths in teaching that were seen in the main school during the previous inspection including in music, modern foreign languages and handwork have remained. Teaching in the kindergarten and sixth form were also stronger at the time of the previous inspection and were not considered as part of this progress monitoring visit. Teachers have been positive about the new programme of lesson visits and monitoring
p.1
Main inspection findings
and are happy to share and discuss their practice. However, this programme of lesson visits and observations has not yet led to any measurable improvements in teaching, especially in mathematics and English. There is still inconsistency between teaching and learning in parallel classes in some year groups. This is because teachers prioritise their own areas of interest or expertise. Staff have been identified to lead mathematics and literacy. They have started to support colleagues in these subjects. However, this is not yet having an impact on improving the progress made by pupils. Leaders have identified that some class teachers do not have the subject knowledge or expertise needed to teach the planned mathematics curriculum. In the last few weeks some classes in Year 9 (class 8) have been identified to be taught by a mathematic specialist. This is a positive change, but it has not been in place long enough to help pupils catch up.
p.2
Main inspection findings
The curriculum in mathematics has now been outlined for each class. However, there is not enough flexibility to allow the work set to match the ability of pupils in the class. Some pupils told the inspector that they have not had any challenging mathematics work this year. Teachers use repetition well in mathematics to help pupils to remember key number facts; however, what pupils in some year groups are being asked to remember is too easy. The director of learning is gradually putting in place systems and processes to monitor teaching and delegate leadership responsibilities. However, progress since the previous inspection has been too slow and pupils are continuing to underachieve because of weak teaching. These standards continue to be unmet. Paragraph 2(2)(e), 2(2)(e)(i), 2(2)(e)(ii), 2(2)(e)(iii) Careers education and guidance were not in place for older pupils at the time of the previous inspection.
p.2
Main inspection findings
Leaders planned a full-scale review of careers education and planned to make a dedicated page on the school website with careers information. These actions have been completed. There is now an appropriate programme of careers education activities for pupils in Year 8 (class 7) upwards. Ambitions in this area are high and members of staff responsible for careers have made strong progress in developing the programme. They know that the Year 7 (class 6) programme needs to focus more on employability and understanding contemporary career options, rather than studying historical employment Leaders have ensured that these standards are now met. Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils Paragraph 7, 7(a), 7(b), 32(1), 32(1)(c) The safeguarding policy was updated in September 2019 to reflect new national and local guidance. The policy is fit for purpose. Parts of the policy are highlighted in red, to
p.2
Main inspection findings
show they are new or how they relate to the particular context of this school. This is very helpful. There are no new concerns about safeguarding, and arrangements in the school continue to be effective. For example, any concerns about school staff are referred to the local authority’s designated officer for advice, as required. Leaders need to ensure that strong lines of accountability for safeguarding continue. This is to ensure that the strong processes the school has become accustomed to are not watered down by changes in leadership or the delegation of tasks. The safeguarding policy is published on the school website, as required. These standards continue to be met. Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools Paragraph 34(1), 34(1)(a), 34(1)(b) Substantial weaknesses in the leadership of teaching and learning were found at the time of the previous inspection. These weaknesses were accepted by trustees. However,
p.3
Main inspection findings
there were relative strengths in the operational leadership of the school and in the leadership of personal development and well-being of pupils. The action plan included an ambition to appoint an independent education trustee and an educational lead. A full audit of leadership capacity and structures was due to be carried out. An educational trustee was appointed in May 2019 and further trustees with experience in education are being appointed. There has been a change in chair of trustees. Some trustees do not fully understand their roles and go beyond their remit A director of learning was appointed in August 2019 to work alongside the director of operations. However, trustees did not make clear their roles and responsibilities. This has led to some confusion in the leadership of the school especially in terms of lines of accountability and line management of staff. There has been a breakdown in communication between senior leaders and this has
p.3
Main inspection findings
slowed progress. Each director’s expertise is not being fully utilised. Leaders do not have a strong overview of the quality of teaching, despite the introduction of monitoring activities. There is limited leadership capacity within the teaching team in the main school to make the improvements needed. Improvements to teaching in the main school have been too slow, very recent and fragile. Trustees and leaders have not worked together effectively to ensure that all of the independent school standards are met consistently. New appointments and temporary promotions have not yet had the impact on raising standards that the trustees desired. These standards continue to be umet.
p.3
Compliance with regulatory requirements
The school does not meet the requirements of the schedule to The Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014 (‘the independent school standards’) and associated requirements that were checked during this inspection, as set out in the annex of this report. This included the standards and requirements that the school was judged to not comply with at the previous inspection. Not all of the standards and associated requirements were checked during this inspection.
p.5
The school now meets the following independent school standards
2(1) The standard in this paragraph is met if— – 2(1)(b) the written policy, plans and schemes of work– – 2(1)(b)(i) take into account the ages, aptitudes and needs of all pupils, including those pupils with an EHC plan. 2(2) For the purposes of paragraph (2)(1)(a), the matters are– – 2(2)(a) full-time supervised education for pupils of compulsory school age (construed in accordance with section 8 of the Education Act 1996), which gives pupils experience in linguistic, mathematical, scientific, technological, human and social, physical and aesthetic and creative education; – 2(2)(b) that pupils acquire speaking, listening, literacy and numeracy skills; – 2(2)(e) for pupils receiving secondary education, access to accurate, up-to-date careers guidance that– – 2(2)(e)(i) is presented in an impartial manner; – 2(2)(e)(ii) enables them to make informed choices about a broad range of career options; and
p.5
The school now meets the following independent school standards
– 2(2)(e)(iii) helps to encourage them to fulfil their potential.
p.5
The school now meets the following independent school standards
4 The standard in this paragraph is met where the proprietor ensures that a framework for pupil performance to be evaluated, by reference to the school’s own aims as provided to parents or national norms, or to both, is in place.
p.5
School details
This inspection was carried out under section 109(1) and (2) of the Education and Skills Act 2008, the purpose of which is to advise the Secretary of State for Education about the school’s suitability for continued registration as an independent school.
p.6
School details
School status Independent boarding school
p.6
School details
Gender of pupils in the sixth form Mixed
p.6
School details
Of which, number on roll in sixth form 54
p.6
School details
Proprietor Council of Trustees of the Michael Hall School Chair Sean Rafferty
p.6
School details
Headteacher Davina Skinner (Director of Operations) Paul Farr (Director of Learning) Annual fees (day pupils) Up to £12,670
p.6
School details
Email address davina.skinner@michaelhall.co.uk
p.6
School details
Date of previous standard inspection 26–28 March 2019
p.6
Information about this school
The school’s previous standard inspection took place in March 2019. The school was judged to be inadequate. Michael Hall School is a co-educational, independent school for pupils aged from three to 19. It adheres to the international Steiner Waldorf curriculum developed by the Austrian philosopher Rudolf Steiner. Michael Hall School is a charitable trust company called Michael Hall School Ltd. The board of the company is known as ‘the council’. Council members are governors, trustees and company directors. The chair of trustees and membership of the board of trustees has changed since the previous inspection. The school has an approved exemption from some aspects of the learning and development requirements of the early years foundation stage. The school does not use alternative providers. The boarding provision has currently been ‘paused’ by the proprietor, prior to a review. The director of learning took up his post in August 2019 and is currently employed to lead
p.6
Information about this school
the school alongside the director of operations.
p.7
Information about this inspection
This inspection was carried out at the request of the registration authority for independent schools. The purpose of the inspection was to monitor the progress the school has made in meeting the independent school standards and other requirements that it was judged to not comply with at its previous inspection. This was the first progress monitoring visit and was conducted with no notice to the school. In March 2019 the school received a standard inspection and was judged to not comply with a number of the independent school standards. The Department for Education (DfE) required the school to produce a statutory action plan. The plan was evaluated by Ofsted in July 2019 and was accepted by the DfE as appropriate. During the inspection I met with the director of learning, director of operations and the bursar. I met with a group of teachers, the special educational needs coordinator and staff responsible for careers education. I had a meeting with a trustee and a telephone
p.8
Information about this inspection
conversation with the chair of trustees. I visited lessons with the director of learning and other leaders. During the lesson visits I talked to pupils about their learning and looked at samples of their work. I looked at a range of school documentation, including safeguarding records.
p.8
Inspection team
Lee Selby, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.8
The school does not meet the following independent school standards
Standards that were not met at the previous inspection and remain un-met at this inspection
p.9
Part 1. Quality of education provided
2(1) The standard in this paragraph is met if–
p.9
Part 1. Quality of education provided
– 2(1)(a) the proprietor ensures that a written policy on the curriculum, supported by appropriate plans and schemes of work, which provides for the matters specified in sub- paragraph (2) is drawn up and implemented effectively.
p.9
Part 1. Quality of education provided
2(2) For the purposes of paragraph (2)(1)(a), the matters are–
p.9
Part 1. Quality of education provided
– 2(2)(h) that all pupils have the opportunity to learn and make progress.
p.9
Part 1. Quality of education provided
3 The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures that the teaching at the school–
p.9
Part 1. Quality of education provided
– 3(a) enables pupils to acquire new knowledge and make good progress according to their ability so that they increase their understanding and develop their skills in the subjects taught;
p.9
Part 1. Quality of education provided
– 3(c) involves well planned lessons and effective teaching methods, activities and management of class time;
p.9
Part 1. Quality of education provided
– 3(d) shows a good understanding of the aptitudes, needs and prior attainments of the pupils, and ensures that these are taken into account in the planning of lessons;
p.9
Part 1. Quality of education provided
– 3(e) demonstrates good knowledge and understanding of the subject matter being taught;
p.9
Part 1. Quality of education provided
– 3(g) demonstrates that a framework is in place to assess pupils’ work regularly and thoroughly and use information from that assessment to plan teaching so that pupils can progress.
p.9
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
34(1) The standard about the quality of leadership and management is met if the proprietor ensures that persons with leadership and management responsibilities at the school–
p.9
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
– 34(1)(a) demonstrate good skills and knowledge appropriate to their role so that the independent school standards are met consistently;
p.9
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
– 34(1)(b) fulfil their responsibilities effectively so that the independent school standards are met consistently. guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.9
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
Parent View You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.11
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/ofsted .
p.11
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.11
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.11
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.11
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion