Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)

Vale of Evesham School

Inspected 7 Nov 2019 · URN SC043049

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Ricky D’Arcy

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    7 Nov 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ricky D’Arcy

  • Helped and protected verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    WR11 1BN

  • Name on report verified

    Vale of Evesham School

  • URN verified

    SC043049

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Helped and protectedInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−63Very criticalmore positive than 63% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingpositivestrongsafeextremelyindependentaccurateeffective
Criticismfailedinadequateseriousfailureconcernsfailuresunsafefail

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1543w−65
  • What needs to improve66w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,597
shorter than usual (typical 2452)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 42
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
4
typical 8
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 78%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 19%

Full report text

Inspection report for residential special school – Vale of Evesham School 1 Vale of Evesham School Four Pools Lane, Evesham, Worcestershire WR11 1BN Residential provision inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this residential special school

The school is an academy and is responsible to a governing body. The school provides education for pupils who have autism spectrum disorders and learning disabilities. The school caters for 193 pupils in total, including the nursery. The boarding service, which operates from Monday to Friday, accommodates up to 15 children. There were 15 children registered to board at the time of the inspection from year groups 7 to 13.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

inadequate

How well children and young people are helped and protected inadequate

p.1

inadequate

The effectiveness of leaders and managers inadequate

p.1

inadequate

There are serious and widespread failures that mean children and young people are not protected and their welfare is not safeguarded.

p.1

inadequate

Date of previous inspection: 4 December 2018

p.1

inadequate

Overall judgement at last inspection: outstanding Inspection report for residential special school – Vale of Evesham School 2

p.1

inadequate

This was an aligned inspection that took place at the same time as an education inspection.

p.2

inadequate

There are serious, widespread failings in safeguarding children across the residential provision. Despite this, there are positives within the service; children are attending school and making progress. However, these positives are undermined by the shortfalls in the help and protection that children receive, and the leadership and management of residence.

p.2

inadequate

Despite the large size of the residential provision, it has a homely feel. Communal areas are clean and comfortable, and in general are furnished and decorated to a good standard.

p.2

inadequate

Children who were spoken with during the inspection all have positive stories of their residential stays. They said that they could share any concerns with trusted adults. Staff gain children’s views and opinions through children’s forums. Children benefit from this inclusive approach.

p.2

inadequate

Children spoke of how much they enjoyed the range of activities offered, especially the residential trips. Feedback from parents and external professionals was positive.

p.2

inadequate

Meeting all national minimum standards (NMS) is a requirement of this academy’s funding agreement. This school has failed to comply with all NMS and has been referred to the relevant regional schools commissioner to consider further action.

p.2

How well children and young people are helped and protected: inadequate

There are serious and widespread failures in how children’s care has been managed at a strategic level. The managerial oversight to safeguard children is inadequate.

p.2

How well children and young people are helped and protected: inadequate

Senior managers have failed to implement a strong safeguarding culture in the school, particularly regarding the safe recruitment of staff. Two residential staff have significant gaps in their recruitment records. A prospective new member of staff in the school was dishonest on their application for their role. When the prospective new member of staff informed senior leaders that they had a criminal caution from the police, an assessment of risk was undertaken by management staff who were not qualified to do so. As a result, the member of staff started employment without sufficient safeguards in place. Further to this, the school’s single central record for the staff was missing essential information. These shortfalls increase the potential for inappropriate and unsafe people to gain employment in the school and this means that children are potentially placed at unknown and unassessed risk. Inspection report for residential special school – Vale of Evesham School 3

p.2

How well children and young people are helped and protected: inadequate

Designated safeguarding leads have failed to follow procedures that are designed to keep children safe. A member of staff was charged by police after being involved in a violent incident in public. Disciplinary proceedings were commenced, and the member of staff resigned from their post. Managers did not ensure that a referral was made to the Disclosure and Barring Service following this safeguarding concern. Again, managers failed to take comprehensive action to safeguard children.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: inadequate

Leaders and managers have failed to promote children’s safety. There has been a failure by managers to identify and address fire safety concerns. For example, during the inspection, fire doors were propped open and two fire doors did not close properly. Fire doors that fail to close properly present a risk to children and staff in the event of a fire.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: inadequate

Residential staff understand and respond appropriately to children’s health needs. However, medication is not stored in line with the school’s medication policy. This means that staff, and indeed, children, could access medication that they should not have access to. This includes controlled medication. This is a serious shortfall that could have significant consequences if a child were to access this medication.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: inadequate

Children have their own rooms and can decorate them as they wish with their own belongings. The layout of the residential provision means that some children’s bedroom doors open into communal areas. Some of the children have extremely complex needs which can manifest in behaviours that are unpredictable and difficult to manage. There are no risk assessments to decide which rooms children are allocated. Such assessments could mitigate and reduce risks to all the children.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: inadequate

The overall impact of these shortfalls is that children are not adequately helped and/or protected.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate

There have been recent changes in the senior leadership at the school. The headteacher left before the start of the academic year and the head of care assumed the role of designated safeguarding lead. A new headteacher started working two days a week at the school in November 2019 and will commence the role fulltime in January 2020.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate

Staff are provided with training to support them in their roles. The head of care provides residential staff with regular opportunities to discuss their practice in formal meetings. However, this support is not offered to the head of care, who has had no recorded supervisions since the last inspection. This is despite newly taking on the significant responsibility for safeguarding. Furthermore, none of the staff spoken with have had an annual appraisal of their work. Failure to provide supervision and appraisals for staff means that they are not provided with routine direction in their work and professional development.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate

It is the role of one of the school governors to oversee the residential service. This Inspection report for residential special school – Vale of Evesham School 4 role includes meeting with the head of care to consider the quality of care provided in the residential provision. Although the head of care has submitted reports about the quality of care to the governors, these reports have failed to reflect many of the safeguarding concerns identified during this inspection.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate

The same governor is one of two independent visitors who visit the school each half term. The independent visitor reports have provided some level of challenge to senior managers. Despite this challenge, the senior leadership team has failed to take any action to address weaknesses in the provision and quality of care raised in these reports. This, along with managers not acting to remedy issues raised in the reports, renders these reports of little value and does not improve the experiences or safety of children.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate

Children’s case files and care plans are generally well written and give an accurate account of children’s needs. However, some information in children’s files, such as what medication they take, is out of date. Not updating records about the medication a child takes demonstrates a failure to take appropriate account of a child’s health needs and could compromise their well-being.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate

Staff de-escalate difficult behaviours well and physical interventions are used rarely. Not all staff who work in the school are employed by the school, for example the school nurse and speech and language therapists. These staff have not received training about how to restrain children. Mitigation of the risks in having untrained staff being involved in physical interventions with children has not been appropriately assessed. This places both staff and children at unnecessary risk.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate

When children display difficult and unwanted behaviours, staff have the option of implementing a measure of control or a sanction. Such measures of control are proportionate but lack management oversight to assess if their use was effective. This does not ensure that reflection and review take place to lessen the potential for these incidents to reoccur. Inspection report for residential special school – Vale of Evesham School 5

p.4

special schools

The school does not meet the following national minimum standards for residential special schools:

p.5

special schools

 All medication is safely and securely stored and proper records are kept of its administration. Prescribed medicines are given only to the children to whom they are prescribed. Children allowed to self-medicate are assessed as sufficiently responsible to do so. (National minimum standard 3.8)  Accommodation is suitably furnished and of sufficient size for the number, needs and ages of children accommodated, with appropriate protection and separation between girls and boys, age groups and accommodation for adults. Bedding is clean and suitable, and is sufficiently warm. (National minimum standard 5.5)  The school premises, accommodation and facilities provided therein are maintained to a standard such that, as far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare of children are ensured. (National minimum standard 6.2)  The school complies with the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005.

p.5

special schools

(National minimum standard 7.1)  The school ensures that: arrangements are made to safeguard and promote the welfare of children at the school; and such arrangements have regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State. (National minimum standard 11.1)  The school’s leadership and management consistently fulfil their responsibilities effectively so that the standards are met. (National minimum standard 13.4)  Schools operate safe recruitment and adopt recruitment procedures in line with the regulatory requirements and having regard to guidance issued by the Secretary of State. (National minimum standard 14.1)  All staff have access to support and advice for their role. They also have regular supervision and formal annual appraisal of their performance. (National minimum standard 19.6)

p.5

Recommendations

 Measures of control require analysis, commentary and oversight.  Standard 20 visits require management analysis, commentary and oversight.  Ensure that all boarding records are accurate and up to date.  Consideration is given to training any staff who are not directly employed by the school in dealing with incidents of challenging behaviour. Inspection report for residential special school – Vale of Evesham School 6

p.5

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’. This inspection was carried out under the Children Act 1989 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential special school – Vale of Evesham School 7

p.6

Residential special school details

Social care unique reference number: SC043049

p.7

Residential special school details

Type of school: Residential special school

p.7

Residential special school details

Email address: rachelperks@advancetrust.org

p.7

Inspector

Ricky D’Arcy, social care inspector Inspection report for residential special school – Vale of Evesham School 8 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

Inspector

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

Inspector

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

Inspector

T: 0300 123 4234 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion