Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
7 Nov 2019
- Inspectorssingle source
Patricia Collis
- Postcode verified
RH10 9NH
- Name on report verified
Phoenix4Training LLP
- URN verified
1280310
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 19
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- —
- Average sentence
- 6 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Phoenix4Training LLP Monitoring visit report
p.1
Name of lead inspector: Patricia Collis, Ofsted Inspector
p.1
Type of provider: Independent learning provider
p.1
Address:
Unit 2F, Suite 7 Sussex Manor Business Park Gatwick Road Crawley West Sussex RH10 9NH Monitoring visit: Phoenix4Training LLP, 6–7 November 2019
p.1
Context and focus of visit
From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by ESFA and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the Further education and skills inspection handbook, especially the sections entitled ‘Monitoring visits’ and ‘Monitoring visits to providers that are newly directly publicly funded’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
Two partners established Phoenix4Training LLP in 2007, offering a range of commercial training and funded training to the health and social care and rail sectors. In March 2017, they received funding directly from the Education and Skills Funding Agency to deliver apprenticeships. Training takes place at employers’ premises, through one-to-one coaching sessions. At the time of the monitoring visit, Phoenix4Training LLP delivered training to 59 apprentices, of whom 21 are funded through the levy. Of these, six apprentices are aged 16 to 18. The vast majority are on apprenticeship frameworks at levels 2 and 3 in a range of vocational pathways, including customer service, team leading and performing manufacturing operations. Eighteen apprentices are studying towards a level 3 apprenticeship standard. Almost half of the apprentices speak English as an additional language.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders have insufficient oversight of the quality of the apprenticeship programme and the progress that apprentices are making. Consequently, apprentices make very slow progress in developing the vocational knowledge, skills and behaviours they need for sustained employment and to complete their qualifications.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders and managers have insufficient understanding of the expectations and requirements of an apprenticeship programme. They do not know whether their apprentices benefit from meaningful activities or receive the off-the-job entitlement of their apprenticeship. Leaders have not ensured that arrangements are in place for the end-point assessment for adult care apprentices on standards qualifications.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders’ management of quality assurance is insufficient to monitor, swiftly identify and address areas of underperformance. They make poor use of information available, such as that from apprentice feedback surveys. They rely too much on Monitoring visit: Phoenix4Training LLP, 6–7 November 2019 informal conversations. Consequently, they are unable to set meaningful targets for improvement or develop plans to increase the quality of teaching and learning.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders do not use their self-assessment review and quality improvement plan to provide a strong basis on which to identify, implement and monitor the improvements needed. Leaders do not benefit from independent scrutiny and monitoring of their work. They have no form of governance in place to hold them accountable for the quality of provision.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Leaders have been too slow in developing an English and mathematics strategy. Consequently, apprentices’ success in gaining their functional skills qualifications is too low. As a result, a few apprentices withdraw from their programme.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Leaders have not ensured that apprentices benefit from high-quality information, advice and guidance. Apprentices do not have access to suitably qualified staff or careers partners to help them realise their future employment aspirations.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Too few apprentices develop new vocational knowledge, skills and behaviours as a result of their apprenticeship. For those who have been in their current job roles for many years, the apprenticeship largely accredits existing skills. Consequently, apprentices are unable to identify what new skills and knowledge they have developed and how they may apply them in their workplaces.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Assessors’ assessment of apprentices’ knowledge and skills is insufficient. They do not establish apprentices’ starting points well enough to be able to plan learning activities or set targets for improvement. Consequently, apprentices do not make good progress and do not always apply their new knowledge and skills to their work roles. Assessors work well with adult care apprentices to select the most appropriate optional units to support their roles in the workplace.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Apprentices do not benefit from frequent, well-planned and high-quality off-the-job training. Assessors do not plan sufficiently with apprentices and their employers meaningful off-the-job activities that will help apprentices to deepen their vocational knowledge.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Apprentices’ development of English and mathematics is too slow. Although assessors make an assessment of apprentices’ existing knowledge, they do not use this to inform apprentices’ programmes of study. They place too much reliance on apprentices studying independently through online resources and completing examination practice papers. Assessors do not ensure that all apprentices continue to develop their literacy and numeracy skills throughout their apprenticeships. Monitoring visit: Phoenix4Training LLP, 6–7 November 2019 Apprentices’ written work is mainly of the standard required for the apprenticeship. However, assessors do not provide feedback to apprentices in enough detail to make it clear what apprentices need to do to improve their work.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Apprentices do not have a sufficiently thorough understanding of how to keep themselves safe. They do not receive adequate information on how to report concerns to Phoenix4Training LLP. Leaders expect apprentices to complete online training modules independently. However, their checking on whether apprentices complete this activity is insufficient. Many apprentices are unable to recall information, such as that about the ‘Prevent’ duty or county lines.
p.4
Insufficient progress
Leaders have appropriate safeguarding policies and procedures in place. However, the language they use is too complex, particularly for the large proportion of apprentices for whom English is an additional language.
p.4
Insufficient progress
The designated safeguarding officer and deputies do not hold a relevant qualification at the level expected for their roles.
p.4
Insufficient progress
Leaders follow safe recruitment practices, but they do not ensure that they update Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) checks in accordance with their own safeguarding policy. An up-to-date ‘Prevent’ duty action plan is in place. Monitoring visit: Phoenix4Training LLP, 6–7 November 2019 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
Insufficient progress
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.5
Insufficient progress
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
Insufficient progress
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.5
Insufficient progress
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion