Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Whitburn Church of England Academy

Inspected 13 Nov 2019 · published 4 Dec 2019 · URN 136386

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    13 Nov 2019

  • Inspectors verified

    Angela White, Chris Smith, Garry Stout, Geoffrey Lumsdon, Michael Wardle

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Outstanding

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    SR6 7EF

  • Name on report verified

    Whitburn Church of England Academy

  • URN verified

    136386

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentOutstanding
  • Quality of educationGood

66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+55Positivemore positive than 44% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexcellentstrongambitiousenjoyexcellent relationshipsvery welloutstandingeffectively
Criticismnot outstandingweakerconcernnot consistentlynot strongyet tovariablenot happy

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1245w+54
  • Safeguarding119w+49

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,330
about usual (typical 1098)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 57, typical 55
Average sentence
12 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%Safeguarding 6%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Inspection of Whitburn Church of England Academy Whitburn, Sunderland, Tyne and Wear SR6 7EF

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Outstanding Leadership and management Good Sixth-form provision Good Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Not previously inspected 12–13 November 2019

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are very proud to attend Whitburn Church of England Academy. They feel safe and secure. Pupils say that they have a strong sense of belonging. They enjoy excellent relationships with the staff. They also have great confidence in the principal’s leadership. They recognise he is taking steps to improve the school.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy learning. They feel that the school supports them well academically. Most pupils are ambitious and keen to be successful. Teachers know their subjects well. Many bring real expertise to the classroom. They teach with enthusiasm and bring topics to life. Sometimes, though, they do not challenge the most able pupils enough. Some teachers also need to adapt lessons more for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school’s values and ethos are tangible. The staff encourage pupils to respect one another and treat everyone kindly. Bullying rarely happens. Pupils have great confidence in the staff to sort out any bullying that may occur. Many pupils take part in the wealth of extra-curricular opportunities. Students in the sixth form are excellent role models. Sixth-form students have set up several societies where they debate and deepen their knowledge. This has helped them to secure places in university.

p.2

better?

In recent years, pupils have not made the outstanding progress they once did. Some pupils, such as those who are disadvantaged and pupils with SEND, do not do as well as they should. The school’s governors have not challenged leaders enough. The new principal and other leaders know this. They know what needs to be improved. Although school finances are challenging, they are making good progress. In most foundation subjects, the curriculum is very well planned and challenges pupils. Much of the teaching is strong and helps pupils to gain a deep understanding and love of the subject. There is some variability, however. Some curriculum planning in subjects such as English and mathematics is not as strong. This is most obvious in key stage 3. In English, for example, leaders are yet to make sure that the curriculum contains enough challenging knowledge. As yet, it does not build seamlessly on the content that pupils learn in primary school.

p.2

better?

The curriculum at key stage 4 provides a broad choice of subjects. Each year, the curriculum delivers above-average GCSE examination results. But the curriculum is no longer balanced as well as it should be. Three years ago, nearly half of pupils studied the suite of subjects in the English Baccalaureate. Since then, fewer and fewer pupils have opted to do so. Currently, only around a fifth of pupils in Years 10 and 11 are studying this challenging combination of subjects. This does not reflect the high standards these pupils achieved at primary school. It is also a long way short of the government’s national ambition for the English Baccalaureate.

p.2

better?

The school’s values centre on being respectful, kind, helpful and fair. Pupils 12–13 November 2019

p.2

3

understand and abide by these values. They behave impeccably and conduct themselves with great maturity across the day. Older pupils, especially students in the sixth form, set a good example to others in how they conduct themselves. Pupils pay attention in lessons and complete homework diligently. They take excellent care of their books. Most pupils attend school well. But the attendance of disadvantaged pupils is well below that of other pupils. The lower attendance of this group of pupils contributed to their weaker examination results.

p.3

3

Support for pupils’ personal development is outstanding. School leaders plan the content of personal, social, health and economic education (PSHE) lessons in detail. Content covered is carefully matched to pupils’ age and maturity. There is extensive coverage of how to stay safe. Issues such as mental health and sex and relationships are covered sensitively. The curriculum is enriched with numerous visits to places of cultural interest. There are a range of exciting programmes that help to build pupils’ character. Pupils are actively encouraged and supported to express their identity. Many pupils take full advantage of the wealth of after-school clubs.

p.3

3

In 2015, school leaders took the decision to open a sixth form. Since then, results have been broadly average. Teachers are continuing to build their subject expertise and refine their curriculum planning. The head of sixth form sets high academic expectations. Students are delighted with the quality of teaching they receive. The work they are set is demanding. Students are ambitious and committed to their studies. Leaders make sure that study programmes include meaningful work experience and helpful careers guidance. Almost all students progress from Year 12 into Year 13. All students progress into further education, employment or training.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders are very knowledgeable about safeguarding. They ensure that the culture in school is one of vigilance. They provide up-to-date training for all members of staff. They take account of local intelligence from partners such as the police. This means that members of staff are quick to spot any signs of concern. Leaders work effectively with other agencies. The detailed records of the actions they take show that they push hard to find solutions.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders make sure that pupils are well informed about risks to their safety. The curriculum helps pupils to recognise when they might be vulnerable. There is excellent provision in place to support pupils to stay physically and mentally healthy.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 When the national curriculum expectations were raised, and new GCSE specifications were introduced, school leaders provided time for departments to adapt their curriculum planning. In most departments, GCSE and A-level courses 12–13 November 2019

p.3

4

were rewritten effectively. However, curriculum planning at key stage 3 developed in a more piecemeal manner. This means that the quality of key stage 3 planning is variable. Leaders must ensure that the key stage 3 curriculum contains sufficiently detailed and demanding knowledge, so that pupils are well prepared to study GCSE and A-level subjects.  Over half of pupils enter the school having attained highly at primary school. However, the proportion of pupils following the suite of subjects in the English Baccalaureate has been falling steadily. Leaders need to rebalance the key stage 4 curriculum and ensure that more of the most able pupils follow a challenging academic programme. They should ensure that the English Baccalaureate is at its heart.  The progress made by some pupils with SEND is not what it should be. Many aspects of SEND provision are working well. Pupils with additional needs are

p.4

4

identified and their needs are accurately assessed. Their support plans are well written. However, teachers do not consistently act on these plans. Leaders should check that teachers adapt or tailor lessons in response to pupils’ additional needs.  Over time, governors have not held leaders to account tightly enough. They did not challenge leaders enough when pupils’ progress began to dip in 2017. Their oversight of school finances in the past has also lacked rigour. They have not, for example, challenged leaders on how pupil premium funding has been spent. At the time of this inspection, an external review of governance was being undertaken. Leaders and governors should ensure that the recommendations from this review are fully implemented.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you’re not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 12–13 November 2019

p.4

provision

Number of pupils on the school roll 1,200

p.5

sixth form

Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.5

Information about this school

 Whitburn Church of England Academy converted to an academy in 2011. The predecessor school, Whitburn Church of England School, was judged to be outstanding. The academy added a sixth form in 2015. The current principal was appointed in May 2019.  The school does not place any pupils in alternative education.  The school has a Church of England denomination. The school’s last section 48 inspection took place in May 2019. The next section 48 inspection will be due in 2024.

p.5

Information about this inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We deemed the inspection a section 5 inspection under the same Act. 12–13 November 2019

p.5

6

 We met the principal and other senior leaders, including the special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) and the head of sixth form. We met the chair of the board of trustees and four members of the governing body. We also met a representative of the Church of England diocese.  We focused on the quality of the curriculum in English, mathematics, modern foreign languages, history and art and design. We looked at these subjects across the full age range, including the sixth form. We met the curriculum leaders for each subject, visited lessons, talked to pupils, looked at pupils’ workbooks and talked to teachers.  We met the SENCo and visited lessons to look at how well teachers supported pupils with special educational needs.  We looked at other information about behaviour, attendance, extra-curricular activities and wider enrichment events. We took parents’ responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, into account.

p.6

6

 We looked at pupils’ punctuality, behaviour and conduct across the school day. The team held discussions with groups of pupils. We also spoke to different members of staff, including a newly qualified teacher, a cleaner, a member of kitchen staff and a teaching assistant to gauge their views about how well pupils behave and conduct themselves. We also met some pupils who have received sanctions in the past.  We looked at the vetting checks leaders make on adults who work in the school. We also talked to the principal and leader in charge of safeguarding arrangements. We looked at records of the actions taken by leaders to protect pupils at risk. The team spoke to pupils to check how safe they felt. We also checked whether members of staff understand and abide by the school’s safeguarding policy.

p.6

Inspection team

Chris Smith, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Geoffrey Lumsdon Ofsted Inspector 12–13 November 2019

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion