Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Alexander McLeod Primary School

Inspected 31 Oct 2019 · published 4 Dec 2019 · URN 131841

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ogugua Okolo-Angus

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    31 Oct 2019

  • Inspectors verified

    Ogugua Okolo-Angus

  • Postcode verified

    SE2 0QS

  • Name on report verified

    Alexander McLeod Primary School

  • URN verified

    131841

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+36Positivemore positive than 30% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoystrongoutstandingsafestrong relationshipswell plannedhappyconfidently
Criticismconcernsstruggleseriousseriouslydecliningunclearnot confidentnot happy

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1105w+38
  • Safeguarding73w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,174
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Plain English
Flesch 65, typical 55
Average sentence
12 words
Next steps
5
typical 4
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 67%Safeguarding 4%About the inspection 28%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Alexander McLeod Primary School Fuchsia Street, London SE2 0QS

p.1

Outcome

Alexander McLeod Primary School continues to be a good school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Alexander McLeod is a happy place that pupils like coming to. Pupils talk confidently and positively about the school. Pupils enjoy the opportunities that the school provides for them outside of their usual lessons. Pupils also enjoy visiting places of interest. These visits are often linked to what they learn in class. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are fully included in school life.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils said that adults look after them. Adults give pupils lots of advice. Pupils said adults help to keep them safe, particularly when they use the internet. Pupils told me that bullying happens at times but that it is dealt with well. Staff deal with any behaviour issues fairly and swiftly. Pupils’ attitudes in lessons are respectful. They are attentive to adults. Pupils are kind and look after each other. They play together well. They know about the rules for behaviour and understand why they are important.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Leaders and staff have continued to provide a good standard of education. Leaders make the teaching of reading a high priority. In the early years, staff are careful and accurate in teaching letters and the sounds they make. This helps to develop children’s early reading skills. Staff are well trained to support pupils who need extra help to catch up. Pupils study a wide range of good-quality texts. By the end of Year 1, nearly all pupils are confident readers. Staff encourage pupils of all ages to love reading. However, for some pupils with SEND and less confident readers this is not the case. This is because books that these pupils read do not match their phonic knowledge. These pupils struggle with words that they cannot read. The early years area is a safe and caring place to learn. Children make a good start to learning in Reception. There is plenty for children to see, do, explore and talk about.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Leaders have clear expectations of what pupils need to learn. Throughout the school 30–31 October 2019

p.1

2

adults plan activities thoughtfully to support pupils’ learning in reading and mathematics. There is a strong focus on communication and language. Staff are kind and encouraging. Established routines help pupils to quickly develop strong relationships and good behaviour. This means that learning is not disrupted and allows lessons to be taught well. In mathematics, leaders have clear subject plans. Training for staff is well thought out. This helps develop teachers’ strong subject knowledge. In turn, teachers use their knowledge to help pupils learn complex topics. Pupils told me that when they struggle, staff find ways to help them understand. In history, subject plans are not as well developed as in mathematics. Curriculum leaders have made a start with identifying the knowledge that they want pupils to retain and use in their future learning. However, pupils do not remember what they have learned in

p.2

2

previous years. Teachers’ understanding of what pupils have learned in history is unclear. Pupils with SEND achieve well. This is because work has been well planned and meets their needs. Pupils with SEND told me they enjoy their learning. These pupils are included in all subjects and all aspects of school life. The headteacher, staff and governors work well as a team. They share high ambitions for the pupils and the school. Most parents say that they are well informed about the school’s work. Staff feel well supported. They told me that they have a voice. Leaders take staff workload seriously, and staff value this support from leaders. Pupils’ opportunities to learn about living in modern Britain are well developed. Pupils have opportunities to share and reflect on their views. Staff teach pupils to think about the needs of other people. For example, all pupils took part in the ‘McLeod marathon’. They learned to raise awareness and money for their chosen charities.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.2

Safeguarding

Pupils’ safety and well-being are of the greatest priority to leaders and staff. Leaders and staff know about potential risks to pupils’ safety in the local area. Staff understand and follow the procedures for raising concerns about pupils’ welfare. Leaders link with other professionals when necessary. Staff help pupils to stay safe, including when they are online. New staff receive prompt training when they join the school.

p.2

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Some lower-ability pupils in Years 1 and 2, including those with SEND, find some of the books they read too difficult. This is because they do not have reading books that match their phonic knowledge. Therefore, they do not have the opportunity to practise 30–31 October 2019

p.2

3

their phonics skills. Leaders should ensure that teachers choose texts to match pupils’ stage of reading accurately. These texts should allow pupils to practise the phonics work they have been doing in lessons.  Teachers’ planning in history places too much emphasis on overarching aims. Teachers focus too much on the individual tasks rather than planning pupils’ learning carefully so that they can know more and remember more. They do not break down learning into manageable steps. As a result, some pupils cannot make connections to what they already know. The headteacher is supporting subject leaders so that they can define essential knowledge that they want pupils to remember. Leaders need to ensure that the history curriculum is carefully sequenced. Teachers need to build pupils’ knowledge from topic to topic and from year to year.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called a section 8 inspection of a good school or non-exempt outstanding school. We do not give graded judgements on a section 8 inspection. However, if we find some evidence that the school could now be better than good or that standards may be declining, then the next inspection will be a section 5 inspection. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the section 8 inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will convert the section 8 inspection to a section 5 inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the second section 8 inspection since we judged the school to be good on 26 and 27 January 2011.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

If you’re not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.3

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 30–31 October 2019

p.3

School details

Inspection number 10110477 Type of school Primary

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.4

School details

Chair of governing body Vaughan Williams

p.4

School details

Date of previous inspection 26–27 January 2011

p.4

Information about this school

 The current headteacher took up his post in September 2019, having previously been the deputy headteacher in the school.

p.4

Information about this inspection

 I met with the headteacher, other members of the senior leadership team and the inclusion leader. A meeting was held with members of the governing body.  I also had a discussion with the school improvement partner.  The subjects considered as part of this inspection were reading, mathematics and history. In each subject, I visited lessons in different year groups, scrutinised pupils’ work and held discussions with subject leaders, teachers and pupils.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, I reviewed school policies, procedures and records. I held meetings with the deputy headteacher as the designated lead for safeguarding to review examples of actions taken to keep pupils safe. I also checked staff members’ understanding of how to keep pupils safe from harm.  I observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons, at breaktime and lunchtime. I spoke to pupils informally when visiting lessons and in groups to gather their views on the school.

p.4

5

 There were no responses to Ofsted’s online pupil survey. A variety of documents and records relating to the school’s work, including behaviour and attendance information, were analysed.  The 51 responses and free-text comments submitted to Parent View, Ofsted’s online questionnaire, were considered.  The 34 responses to Ofsted’s staff survey were considered alongside the views of teachers gathered during meetings with me.

p.5

Inspection team

Ogugua Okolo-Angus, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector 30–31 October 2019

p.5

6

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

6

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

6

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

6

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

6

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion