Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Lansdowne Secure Unit

Inspected 12 Nov 2019 · URN SC031490

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Cathey Moriarty (lead), Cath Sikakana

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    East Sussex County Council

  • Inspection date verified

    12 Nov 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Cath Sikakana, Cathey Moriarty

  • Name on report verified

    SC031490

  • URN verified

    SC031490

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+60Positivemore positive than 75% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositiveenthusiasm

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings23w0
  • What needs to improve106w+60

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
127
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 32, typical 50
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
3
typical 4
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 2%What needs to improve 8%About the inspection 90%

Full report text

Inspection report children’s home: SC031490 1 SC031490 Registered provider: East Sussex County Council Interim inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this children’s home

This secure children’s home is operated by a local authority and is approved by the Secretary of State to restrict children’s liberty. The home can accommodate up to seven children who are aged between 10 and 17. It provides for children accommodated under section 25 of the Children Act 1989, who are placed by local authorities.

p.1

Information about this children’s home

Admission of any child who is under 13 years of age requires the approval of the Secretary of State, under section 25 of the Children Act 1989.

p.1

Information about this children’s home

The commissioning of health services in this home is the statutory responsibility of NHS England under the Health and Social Care Act 2012. Education is provided on site in dedicated facilities.

p.1

Information about this children’s home

The manager has been registered with Ofsted since July 2017.

p.1

Information about this children’s home

Judgement at last inspection: improved effectiveness

p.1

Information about this children’s home

Enforcement action since last inspection: none

p.1

and young people since the most recent full inspection

This home was judged good at the last full inspection. At the interim inspection, Ofsted judges that it has sustained effectiveness.

p.1

and young people since the most recent full inspection

Managers and staff provide nurturing care, consistent routines and expectations, to Inspection report children’s home: SC031490 2 support children to settle and make progress in this home. Staff are considerate and empathetic, and children learn to value positive, healthy relationships with staff and with peers. Children enjoy meals together, participate in group activities and celebrate achievements.

p.1

and young people since the most recent full inspection

Children are listened to. There have been no complaints, as children raise any concerns with staff and managers directly and receive a prompt response. Children contribute to their planning meetings and to their records.

p.2

and young people since the most recent full inspection

At the last inspection, a recommendation regarding support for children’s education was made. This will be assessed at the next inspection.

p.2

and young people since the most recent full inspection

Since the last inspection, there have been a number of changes in the group of children. Staff ensure that children are welcomed and have in place safe visiting and contact arrangements with family and professionals. Staff work closely with professionals, family and carers from the start, to ensure that children move on from the home in a planned way. One parent said that staff in the home are very good at sharing information, are ‘brilliant at listening to the children’, and that it is ‘obvious that staff really [care] about what they do’.

p.2

and young people since the most recent full inspection

The management team has developed and further improved the weekly multi- disciplinary team meetings when plans and progress for each child are considered. These support consistent care and a shared understanding of placement aims and capture actions for practitioners.

p.2

and young people since the most recent full inspection

Managers refer safeguarding incidents to the relevant professionals and adhere to child protection procedures. There has been one allegation that was referred to the local authority designated person and assessed to be about staff conduct. This has concluded. Managers have reviewed the information in respect of learning that can be shared with the team.

p.2

and young people since the most recent full inspection

There are low numbers of all forms of restrictive measures, including the use of physical restraint, that evidence staff use restorative practice, are able to identify triggers and de-escalate situations in most cases.

p.2

and young people since the most recent full inspection

Inspectors found that there had been one incident of challenging behaviour by a child to which the response by the member of staff could have been improved. It did not de- escalate the child’s behaviour but led to a protracted incident, and subsequently the child was separated in order to support her to keep herself safe. The manager was able to review this incident and use it for staff to reflect on. However, the records and audit trail were not as clear.

p.2

and young people since the most recent full inspection

Generally, there are very good-quality assurance systems in place. The independent visitor reports are thorough, timely and child centred. The manager values the fact that the visits challenge practice and support continuous improvement.

p.2

and young people since the most recent full inspection

Monthly quality assurance reports support the team to identify any emerging themes. Inspection report children’s home: SC031490 3 There is a safeguarding incident tracker which includes a rating by the manager of the level of seriousness. In this way, managers build an accurate picture of children’s progress and of whether interventions are affecting positive change.

p.2

and young people since the most recent full inspection

A focus for managers currently is the impact of building work that is taking place as a result of development plans for the home. The manager has been conscientious in monitoring progress and tenacious in mitigating the impact to children’s daily lived experiences. This ensures that a safe environment is maintained and that children continue to have access to outside spaces and activities.

p.3

Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement

12/03/2019 Interim Improved effectiveness 25/09/2018 Full Good 13/02/2018 Interim Improved effectiveness 18/07/2017 Full Good

p.3

Recommendations

 Ensure that the ethos of the home supports each child to learn. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 29, paragraph 5.18) Specifically, clarify and communicate to staff the policy and practice for supporting the education of those who do not attend school.  Staff should understand factors that affect children’s motivation to behave in a socially acceptable way. Staff should encourage an enthusiasm for positive behaviour through the use of positive behaviour strategies in line with the child’s individual plans. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 39, paragraph 8.13) Inspection report children’s home: SC031490 4

p.3

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the differences made to the lives of children and young people. They watched how professional staff work with children and young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care provided. Wherever possible, they talked to children and young people and their families. In addition, the inspectors have tried to understand what the children’s home knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people whom it is trying to help, protect and look after.

p.4

Information about this inspection

This inspection focused on the effectiveness of the home and the progress and experiences of children and young people since the most recent full inspection.

p.4

Information about this inspection

Using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’, this inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’.

p.4

Children’s home details

Registered provider address: 175b Priory Road, Hastings, Sussex TN34 3JD

p.4

Inspectors

Cathey Moriarty, social care inspector Cath Sikakana, social care inspector Inspection report children’s home: SC031490 5 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Inspectors

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Inspectors

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Inspectors

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion