Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

The Waterloo School

Inspected 6 Nov 2019 · published 2 Dec 2019 · URN 116633

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Linda Jacobs (lead), Mark Bagust

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    6 Nov 2019

  • Inspectors verified

    Linda Jacobs, Mark Bagust

  • Postcode verified

    PO7 7JJ

  • Name on report verified

    The Waterloo School

  • URN verified

    116633

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+16Mostly positivemore positive than 14% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveoutstandingstrongwell-plannedcaringsupportiveimprovedhappy
Criticismconcernsnot alwaysseriousconcerndecliningmissednot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1040w+17
  • Safeguarding93w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,129
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 58, typical 55
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 59%Safeguarding 5%About the inspection 35%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: The Waterloo School Warfield Avenue, Waterlooville, Hampshire PO7 7JJ

p.1

Outcome

The Waterloo School continues to be a good school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

This is a caring school that supports pupils’ special educational needs well. Pupils arrive having had a difficult time in their earlier education. Right from the start, staff let every pupil know that they can achieve well. Pupils know the adults in school value them as individuals. At this school, they learn to develop trust, confidence and an interest in learning. Rewards help pupils to concentrate well on their learning activities. Finding supportive friends helps to make the school day enjoyable.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are settled because teachers have a thorough understanding of how to meet emotional needs. Support staff are always on hand to help pupils with their behaviour and learning. Over time, pupils find helpful ways to cope with their anxieties and angry feelings. Older pupils told inspectors that the school has ‘majorly improved’ their behaviour. Parents and carers told inspectors that their family lives have ‘turned around’ as a result of their children now feeling happy and safe at school. Incidents of bullying are rare. Pupils know that they must tell a trusted adult. Staff sort out concerns quickly to prevent them happening again.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The headteacher’s belief in ‘learning for life’ lies at the heart of the school’s provision. A skilful staff team supports this aim. Staff do all that they can to ensure that pupils learn in a positive and safe environment. Sometimes, individual pupils cannot manage their feelings. Staff are expert in managing these incidents so that they do not interrupt the flow of learning.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Pupils start at the school, often having missed a lot of learning. By the time that pupils transfer to secondary school, they are beginning to catch up. There is a strong culture of developing pupils’ language, literacy and number skills. Reading is a top priority throughout the school. For example, pupils listen to stories and read with an adult every day. Paired reading sessions help pupils to develop confidence in reading. Reading helps pupils to talk about books and develop their language skills. Pupils develop an impressive understanding 5–6 November 2019

p.1

2

of vocabulary. The need to teach phonics is new to the school. A few younger pupils need to be allowed further practice, to develop their phonics learning. Teachers and other adults are making sure this happens.

p.2

2

Teachers use their assessments well, particularly in mathematics. They identify what pupils already know and can do. Teachers then work out what pupils need to learn next. In mathematics, teachers make sure that pupils cover the right areas of learning in the right order. Pupils become confident to understand how numbers work through the use of practical apparatus. This encourages them to try more challenging work.

p.2

2

Teachers do their utmost to make sure that lessons help pupils to improve their self-esteem, mental and/or physical health. A broad range of subjects motivates pupils well. Many pupils say that physical education (PE) is their favourite subject. Well-planned lessons help pupils to develop skills and improve their performance. They enjoy exciting experiences, such as trampolining, judo, boxing and water sports.

p.2

2

Pupils learn to understand their own and others’ feelings. For example, in personal, social and health education (PSHE), older pupils reflected on what ‘belonging’ means to them. In some subjects, including in PSHE, the content is not always sequenced as well as it could be to build on previous knowledge.

p.2

2

Teachers use plans that are specific to individual pupils. They also use leaders’ subject planning. On occasion, the different layers of planning do not link well to meet pupils’ needs. This means that lesson content is not always well matched to pupils’ next steps in learning.

p.2

2

Leaders and governors value their staff team. Everyone enjoys working at the school. Leaders are considerate of teachers’ workload.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.2

Safeguarding

The designated leader is supported by a team of deputies. They ensure that the school’s work to support pupils and their families has the very highest priority. Staff are alert to even the smallest changes that might suggest a safeguarding concern. They record observations diligently so that leaders are quickly aware.

p.2

Safeguarding

Leaders work closely with a wide range of agencies who offer family support. Leaders make timely referrals to help families have the support they need. The governing body ensures that the school follows agreed safeguarding procedures.

p.2

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The school’s curriculum is not yet sufficiently coherently planned and sequenced in some subjects. However, it is clear from the actions that leaders have already taken that they are in the process of bringing this about. Leaders have not established how 5–6 November 2019

p.2

3

subject planning aligns with the academic learning objectives identified in pupils’ individual education plans. Leaders need to refine their curriculum planning so that the personalised approaches they value can link clearly with the key content in each subject.  Leaders have identified that the teaching of phonics will benefit a small number of younger pupils who are new to the school, so that they develop fluency in reading. Staff training has begun to enhance classroom practice, but the phonics programme is not fully implemented. Leaders should strengthen the school’s early reading expertise so that key stage 1 pupils, in particular, rapidly and securely develop effective skills in phonics.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called a section 8 inspection of a good school or non-exempt outstanding school. We do not give graded judgements on a section 8 inspection. However, if we find some evidence that the school could now be better than good or that standards may be declining, then the next inspection will be a section 5 inspection. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the section 8 inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will convert the section 8 inspection to a section 5 inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the first section 8 inspection since we judged The Waterloo School to be good on 4–5 May 2016.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.3

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 5–6 November 2019

p.3

School details

Inspection number 10111393 Type of school Special

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.4

School details

Date of previous inspection 4–5 May 2016

p.4

Information about this school

 All pupils at the school have an education, health and care plan. They are placed by the local authority as a result of their social, emotional and mental health needs. Some pupils travel long distances across the county in order to attend the school.  Most pupils join the school during key stage 2, and mainly in Years 5 or 6. There are very few pupils in key stage 1.  Since the previous inspection, the school’s role has increased by three classes of pupils. There are now eight classes. In September 2018, two new classrooms were added on the school site. These classrooms form the school’s provision for pupils diagnosed with an autistic spectrum disorder.  Approximately two thirds of the school are eligible for free school meals. One fifth of the school are children looked after.  As a result of their recent annual reviews, a small number of pupils access alternative providers for part of the week: Oarsome Chance and Second Chance Children’s Charity.

p.4

Information about this school

 The school is commissioned by the local authority to provide an outreach service to local mainstream schools. 5–6 November 2019

p.4

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors met with the headteacher and deputy headteacher, subject leaders, the special educational needs coordinator, designated leaders for safeguarding and a range of support and teaching staff.  As lead inspector, I met three members of the governing body, including the chair. A telephone conversation took place with the local authority’s linked adviser.  We examined a wide range of documentation provided by the school, including documents published on the school’s website and curriculum planning.  A significant proportion of the inspection focused on ensuring that pupils are safe. We checked how the school makes recruitment checks on staff, governors and volunteers. In addition, we discussed safeguarding with leaders, checked documentation, tested staff’s safeguarding knowledge, and spoke with pupils and parents.  We considered 14 responses to Ofsted Parent View and also met some of them. The

p.5

Information about this inspection

inspection took into account 16 responses to the staff survey. In order to gain an understanding of the views of pupils, we talked to them in their classrooms and met a representative group more formally.  We did deep dives in these subjects: reading, mathematics, PSHE and PE. This included visiting lessons, looking at pupils’ work, meeting with senior and subject leaders and discussions with teachers and pupils.

p.5

Inspection team

Linda Jacobs, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.5

Inspection team

Mark Bagust Ofsted Inspector 5–6 November 2019

p.5

6

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

6

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

6

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

6

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

6

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion