Other · Ofsted report
Genius Software Solutions Limited
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
24 Oct 2019
- Inspectorssingle source
Sarah McGrath
- Postcode verified
G33 1AN
- Name on report verified
Genius Software Solutions Limited
- URN verified
1280339
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Consequently, learners do not have a clear understanding of how, or to whom, they should report concerns. p.4
- Too many apprentices already have the skills and knowledge that they need to perform their roles. p.2
- This means that apprentices do not know what they need to do to improve their skills. p.3
- Apprentices who need to achieve English or mathematics qualifications do not receive enough structured support to develop their skills, and they are not well prepared for examinations. p.3
- Tutors provide feedback that focuses too narrowly on completion of assessment criteria and does not explain to apprentices what they need to do to improve. p.3
- As a result, learners do not progress as quickly as they should between tutors’ visits. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment6
“As a result, they do not carry out specific and accurate risk assessments.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 1,191
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 34, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Genius Software Solutions Limited Monitoring visit report
p.1
Name of lead inspector: Sarah McGrath, Ofsted Inspector
p.1
Type of provider: Independent learning provider
p.1
Address: 1439 Cumbernauld Road Glasgow G33 1AN Monitoring visit: Genius Software Solutions, 23–24 October 2019
p.1
Context and focus of visit
From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by the Education and Skills Funding Agency and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the ‘Further education and skills inspection handbook’, especially the sections entitled ‘Monitoring visits’ and ‘Monitoring visits to providers that are newly directly publicly funded’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
Genius Software Solutions delivers apprenticeships across Scotland and England. Programmes in England were in scope for this visit; at the time of the monitoring visit, there were 109 apprentices on these programmes. Nearly a fifth of apprenticeships are delivered through a subcontracting arrangement. These are a mixture of frameworks and standards-based programmes at levels 2 and 3, predominantly in early years and teaching and learning. All of the apprenticeships that are delivered directly are at level 3. Just over a half are standards-based apprenticeships in team leading. Slightly fewer than a half are frameworks in financial services and a very small number are frameworks in business administration.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders do not ensure that the curriculum is sufficiently challenging for apprentices. Too many apprentices already have the skills and knowledge that they need to perform their roles. They see the apprenticeship as a way to accredit these skills, rather than to develop them. Consequently, programmes are of little benefit to too many apprentices and do not develop or extend their knowledge, skills or behaviours.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders and managers do not evaluate well enough the quality of training that apprentices receive and have not put in place effective arrangements to improve quality. When managers do identify areas for improvement, they do not set specific enough actions for staff to take to improve the quality of training.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders do not act with sufficient urgency to address concerns about apprentices’ progress. They have a clear overview of the apprenticeship provision and have processes in place to identify any concerns, but do not use these processes well enough. As a result, apprentices who have been identified as making slow progress continue to make slow progress over several months. Monitoring visit: Genius Software Solutions, 23–24 October 2019 Leaders and managers work well with employers to develop the curriculum in line with the provider’s specialist areas of financial services and leadership and management. Employers are fully involved in the development of programmes and they help to select the most appropriate units and training patterns for apprentices. As a result, apprenticeship programmes are closely aligned to the business needs of employers.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders and managers have recruited appropriately qualified staff with expertise in the subjects that they deliver. Staff receive support to acquire teaching qualifications where appropriate.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Leaders manage the subcontracted provision effectively.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Too many apprentices do not make rapid enough progress in developing their skills and knowledge. Tutors do not routinely discuss skills development as part of the review process, and do not set appropriately challenging targets for apprentices to help them make good progress. Tutors provide feedback that focuses too narrowly on completion of assessment criteria and does not explain to apprentices what they need to do to improve.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Around half of the apprentices on programme are not developing substantial new knowledge, skills and behaviours. Apprentices on frameworks, and those on the early cohorts of standards-based apprenticeships in team leading, use the apprenticeship programme to become more confident in their roles and to accredit their existing skills.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Although managers plan off-the-job training carefully at the start of programmes and ensure that employers understand its importance, they rely on employers delivering much of the training as part of their existing induction and training programme. Ineffective communication between tutors and apprentices means that tutors do not track or record off-the-job training accurately and do not measure its impact. As a result, learners do not progress as quickly as they should between tutors’ visits.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Managers do not place a sufficiently high priority on the development of apprentices’ skills in English and mathematics. Tutors do not support apprentices well enough to improve the accuracy of their written work. They do not routinely identify or correct errors in apprentices’ written work. This means that apprentices do not know what they need to do to improve their skills. Apprentices who need to achieve English or mathematics qualifications do not receive enough structured support to develop their skills, and they are not well prepared for examinations. Monitoring visit: Genius Software Solutions, 23–24 October 2019 A high proportion of the apprentices recruited recently to standards-based apprenticeships make good progress. They are developing new knowledge, skills and behaviours which they apply well at work. This group accounts for approximately a third of current apprentices.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Leaders do not have in place sufficiently rigorous safeguarding procedures. Consequently, learners do not have a clear understanding of how, or to whom, they should report concerns. Leaders do not have a sufficient understanding of the specific risks to learners in the locations where they deliver apprenticeship programmes. They do not have a clear understanding of local authorities’ reporting procedures. As a result, they do not carry out specific and accurate risk assessments.
p.4
Insufficient progress
Although apprentices receive training on safeguarding as part of their induction, tutors do not revisit these topics during apprentices’ programmes. Consequently, apprentices’ understanding is not secure. Employers, however, work well with apprentices to ensure that they understand how safeguarding applies to their specific roles and industries.
p.4
Insufficient progress
Leaders have implemented appropriate safe recruitment policies and practices. All staff receive appropriate training on safeguarding and the ‘Prevent’ duty at induction and renew this training at appropriate intervals. However, the designated safeguarding lead had not updated her training prior to this monitoring visit. Monitoring visit: Genius Software Solutions, 23–24 October 2019 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding
p.4
Insufficient progress
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.5
Insufficient progress
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
Insufficient progress
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.5
Insufficient progress
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion