Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
St Mary's Catholic Primary School
Summary
Emma Jackson (lead), Julie Bather
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
6 Nov 2019
- Inspectors verified
Emma Jackson, Julie Bather
- Postcode verified
PR4 0RJ
- Name on report verified
St Mary’s Catholic Primary School
- URN verified
119634
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders should ensure that teachers continue to teach all subjects with sufficient depth to ensure that pupils know more and remember more. p.3
- However, governors should ensure that they ask challenging and timely questions so that they gain an even deeper strategic understanding of the school’s effectiveness. p.3
- They understand what the school does well and what needs to be improved. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Parents & families5
“The vast majority of parents are extremely happy with the school.” p.2Communication & language4
“Pupils are able to talk confidently about books and authors they have enjoyed.” p.2Progress & outcomes4
“Leaders promote a love of reading and pupils achieve well.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,120
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Plain English
- Flesch 60, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of a good school: St Mary’s Catholic Primary School Darkinson Lane, Lea Town, Preston, Lancashire PR4 0RJ
p.1
Outcome
St Mary’s Catholic Primary School continues to be a good school.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are proud to attend St Mary’s. They enjoy their learning because lessons are varied and interesting. Pupils use the school’s ‘E.A.T.’ approach to learning. This means that they can explore, be active and think creatively in lessons.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The pupils whom we spoke with told us that there is very little bullying and name-calling in their school. They say that everyone gets along well together. If they do not, teachers are always there to help them sort out their differences quickly. Lessons are rarely disrupted by pupils’ behaviour.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The school has a strong culture of respect and serving others. The school council leads a number of activities that encourage all pupils to take part in school and community events.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils really value the wide range of clubs and activities on offer in school. Pupils have the opportunity to take part in many activities after school. These include dance, science, hockey and judo clubs.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils feel safe in school. They say that adults look after them well. They know that there is someone to talk to if they are worried. Older pupils know how to keep themselves safe online and when using social media. This is supported in school by lessons about cyber safety.
p.1
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The associate headteacher and other leaders provide positive direction for the school. They understand what the school does well and what needs to be improved.
p.1
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Leaders have a clear vision and ambition for the curriculum. They have worked hard over the last year with staff, parents, carers and governors to redesign the curriculum. This is so that pupils can study a full range of subjects in a more logical way. However, this work 6 November 2019
p.1
2
is relatively recent. As a result, it is not possible to see the impact of these changes in some subjects. Some subjects have not previously been taught in enough depth to ensure that pupils know more and remember more. For example, pupils are knowledgeable about what they have learned in geography this term. However, they are less confident when discussing previous learning in geography.
p.2
2
The teaching of reading is a strength of the school. Leaders promote a love of reading and pupils achieve well. Teachers make sure that pupils receive high-quality phonics teaching from the start of Reception. If anyone begins to fall behind, teachers act swiftly to help them catch up. Older pupils are confident readers and they read with fluency and expression. Pupils are able to talk confidently about books and authors they have enjoyed.
p.2
2
In 2019, pupils achieved well in the key stage 2 national assessments in reading, writing and mathematics. However, pupils did not achieve well in mathematics in 2018. Leaders acted quickly to address this. Pupils talk enthusiastically about the changes in their mathematics lessons. They develop skills and knowledge to solve problems and can describe how they arrive at an answer. Pupils’ learning in mathematics is now taught in a logical order. Work is clearly matched to the needs of all pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities. As a result, pupils’ achievement improved in this subject in 2019.
p.2
2
Governors work very effectively for the school. They visit the school often and take part in many school activities. Leaders provide governors with detailed reports about the school. However, governors do not always ask challenging questions, which would allow them to have a deeper understanding of the school’s effectiveness.
p.2
2
The vast majority of parents are extremely happy with the school. They value the welcoming atmosphere and feel that their children are safe. A comment from one parent typifies the views of others, ‘The school really does feel like an extended family.’
p.2
2
Staff appreciate leaders’ efforts to reduce workload. Teachers say there have been positive changes. Leaders always take the well-being of staff into consideration.
p.2
Safeguarding
Safeguarding has a high priority. Staff are well trained and receive regular updates. They know what to do and who to talk to if they are worried about a child. Leaders, including governors, ensure that the systems for recruiting new staff are robust. All the appropriate checks are carried out on staff.
p.2
Safeguarding
Leaders work closely with a wide range of professionals to make sure that vulnerable families get the help and support they need. 6 November 2019
p.2
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Leaders have worked hard to redesign the school’s curriculum. The changes that leaders have made in English and mathematics have begun to bear fruit. Pupils are able to demonstrate a detailed understanding of their learning. In other subjects, such as geography, there has not been sufficient time to embed changes made to the curriculum. Leaders should ensure that teachers continue to teach all subjects with sufficient depth to ensure that pupils know more and remember more. Ofsted’s transition arrangements were used in this inspection to confirm that pupils benefit from a good quality of education. Governors receive a wide range of information and are knowledgeable about the work of the school. However, governors should ensure that they ask challenging and timely questions so that they gain an even deeper strategic understanding of the school’s effectiveness.
p.3
Background
When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called a section 8 inspection of a good school or non-exempt outstanding school. We do not give graded judgements on a section 8 inspection. However, if we find some evidence that the school could now be better than good or that standards may be declining, then the next inspection will be a section 5 inspection. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the section 8 inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will convert the section 8 inspection to a section 5 inspection immediately.
p.3
Background
This is the first section 8 inspection since we judged the school to be good on 2–3 June 2015.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school. 6 November 2019
p.3
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 6 November 2019
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10087713 Type of school Primary
p.5
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Chair of governing body Mr Gerrard Oakes
p.5
School details
Headteacher Mrs Anne Charnley (associate headteacher)
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 2–3 June 2015
p.5
Information about this school
All pupils are taught in mixed-age classes. Several staff have joined the school since the previous inspection. At the time of the inspection, an associate headteacher was responsible for the daily running of the school as a temporary arrangement while the substantive headteacher is on leave.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspectors met with the associate headteacher, the substantive headteacher, the deputy headteacher, subject leaders, teachers and members of the governing body. We also spoke with a representative of the local authority. We talked with pupils in meetings and around school. We listened to pupils read. We considered 36 responses to the online questionnaire for parents, Parent View, and the free-text responses. There were no responses to the staff or pupil questionnaires. We looked at the school’s improvement plan and at the minutes of governors’ meetings. Inspectors reviewed a range of documentation about the school. This included information about safeguarding, including the school’s record of checks undertaken on 6 November 2019
p.5
6
newly appointed staff and documents related to support for pupils. As part of the inspection, we considered how phonics and reading are taught. We also considered how mathematics and geography are taught. We visited lessons with leaders and looked at pupils’ work. We met with some pupils from the lesson visits to discuss their learning. We discussed the curriculum in these subjects with teachers and leaders.
p.6
Inspection team
Emma Jackson, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Julie Bather Ofsted Inspector 6 November 2019
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion