Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
The Bishop's Church of England Primary Academy
Summary
Steve Mellors (lead), Jo Nutbeam, Julie Harrison
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
9 Oct 2019
- Inspectors verified
Jo Nutbeam, Julie Harrison, Steve Mellors
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
IP24 1EB
- Name on report verified
The Bishop’s Church of England Primary Academy
- URN verified
142633
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationInadequate
3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The quality of education for pupils attending The Bishop’s Church of England Primary Academy is inadequate. p.2
- Staff are alert to any signs that pupils may be at risk of harm. p.4
- In mathematics, weaker teaching in the past has led to gaps in pupils’ knowledge and skills. p.2
- Leaders have taken time to tackle weaknesses in the school. p.3
- Despite weaknesses in the school’s quality of education, the early years is securely good. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Teachers’ expectations of what pupils should achieve are not consistently high enough. p.2
- Where teaching is less effective, pupils do not concentrate as well as they should. p.3
- In too many subjects, including reading and writing at key stage 2, leaders’ planning does not identify what pupils need to know. p.2
- Leaders must ensure that teachers understand how best to check and use pupils’ prior knowledge so that they are able to tackle new ideas. p.4
- Curriculum leaders must know how they will check and monitor that this is in place. p.4
- They are not achieving as well as they should. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance28
“Leaders have taken time to tackle weaknesses in the school.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,467
- about usual (typical 1552)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 56, typical 53
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 6
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of The Bishop’s Church of England Primary Academy Canterbury Way, Thetford, Norfolk IP24 1EB
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Good Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Not previously inspected 8–9 October 2019
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The quality of education for pupils attending The Bishop’s Church of England Primary Academy is inadequate.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Teachers’ expectations of what pupils should achieve are not consistently high enough. Where expectations are highest, such as in the early years and key stage 1, pupils make a good start to their education. However, this is not the case in key stage 2. As a result, pupils are not achieving well in reading, writing and mathematics.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils told us that they like coming to school. They said that they make friends easily. We saw pupils being orderly and calm around the school building. Leaders provide lots of things for pupils to do during the lunch hour. This encourages pupils to play together and behave well during these times. However, some pupils’ behaviour is not as good as it should be in the classroom.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils’ attendance is starting to improve. Leaders closely track how well different groups of pupils are coming to school.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils feel safe at school. Parents and carers agree with this and consider that staff look after their children well. Pupils said that sometimes bullying does happen. They know what to do if they were to be bullied. Pupils are confident that adults will effectively deal with any of their concerns.
p.2
better?
In too many subjects, including reading and writing at key stage 2, leaders’ planning does not identify what pupils need to know. Curriculum plans are not clearly structured. They do not identify what pupils should know at key points in different subjects. The failings in the quality of education means that too many pupils are not achieving what is expected for their age.
p.2
better?
Teachers do not have a consistent understanding how to plan a sequence of lessons. Plans do not build on what pupils have learned before. Consequently, pupils do not remember important facts and are often confused about what they are learning. For example, in a key stage 2 class, pupils could not answer questions about a text because they did not understand the meaning of inference.
p.2
better?
In mathematics, weaker teaching in the past has led to gaps in pupils’ knowledge and skills. Leaders’ new plans are starting to address these gaps. This is having more of an impact in key stage 1. However, teachers’ subject knowledge and understanding is underdeveloped. Teachers do not check that pupils apply what they know to explaining and solving mathematical problems.
p.2
better?
The teaching of early reading is effective. Children start learning phonics when they begin school. They quickly pick up the initial sounds that letters make. The school’s 8–9 October 2019
p.2
3
reading champion ensures that adults use a consistent approach to teaching phonics. Adults spot when pupils struggle with their reading. Additional sessions are provided so that pupils keep up with their classmates. Pupils use their phonics knowledge to read books that are well selected to improve their reading accuracy and fluency. However, pupils are not given sufficient opportunities to build on these strong foundations in key stage 2.
p.3
3
Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) receive effective support. Adults support these pupils well. This helps pupils to meet their personal targets identified on their plans.
p.3
3
Disadvantaged pupils benefit from the approaches used to support their early reading. However, other aspects of the curriculum have not been considered well enough to ensure that disadvantaged pupils make secure gains in their knowledge and skills.
p.3
3
Pupils wear their uniforms with pride. They are keen to talk about their achievements and learning. Pupils enjoy positive relationships with adults. Many pupils willingly follow adults’ instructions. However, some pupils told us that behaviour is not always good in the classroom. Where teaching is less effective, pupils do not concentrate as well as they should.
p.3
3
Pupils fulfil different roles in the life of the school. For example, pupils can volunteer to be play leaders or assembly monitors. Pupils are aware of the school’s core values. However, leaders do not provide enough opportunities to promote pupils’ understanding of different cultures. Pupils learn about faiths and beliefs. Nonetheless, they do not develop a good understanding of the different cultures that exist in modern Britain.
p.3
3
Leaders have taken time to tackle weaknesses in the school. They are now acting to improve the school. Some leaders are new to their positions. The trust is ensuring that these leaders develop the skills that they need to develop the curriculum. Leaders are better placed to make the necessary improvements. The trust is working effectively with the recently established governing board to ensure that leaders make rapid improvements to the school.
p.3
3
Despite weaknesses in the school’s quality of education, the early years is securely good. Teachers create a buzz of excitement about learning among children. Leaders plan interesting activities that promote children’s curiosity, imagination and play. Children use these activities effectively to improve their speaking, learn about numbers and to understand more about the world. Adults have high expectations of children’s behaviour. Clear routines ensure that children listen to each other and play safely. Leaders have planned the curriculum so that meets children’s needs. For example, tasks designed around a shared book helps children to talk about the story and its characters when they use the role play area. 8–9 October 2019
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.4
Safeguarding
Safeguarding is a high priority for leaders and staff. Systems are well established and appropriate measures are in place to ensure pupils’ safety.
p.4
Safeguarding
Leaders’ records for checking the suitability of staff, volunteers and visitors are well maintained. Governors make regular visits to ensure that the records are up to date.
p.4
Safeguarding
All staff receive regular training about safeguarding matters. Staff are alert to any signs that pupils may be at risk of harm. Adults understand how to respond to worries that pupils may share with them. Leaders encourage staff to record all concerns. Leaders regularly review concerns and take swift action to ensure that pupils get the help that they need.
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The curriculum for different subjects, particularly reading and writing at key stage 2, is not well structured. Leaders need to identify key components of knowledge that pupils need to learn and the order in which they need to learn them. Leaders must ensure that teachers understand how best to check and use pupils’ prior knowledge so that they are able to tackle new ideas. This is to ensure that pupils’ knowledge is built over time and helps them to remember more. In mathematics, teachers do not systematically check that pupils have a secure understanding of the concepts that they are learning. Leaders should ensure that all teachers have the subject knowledge that they need to implement leaders’ plans for mathematics successfully. Until recently, leaders have not acted swiftly enough to improve the school. Leaders should ensure that the training being provided will help curriculum leaders have a clear understanding of what a good-quality education looks like.
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Curriculum leaders must know how they will check and monitor that this is in place. Disadvantaged pupils have gaps in their learning. They are not achieving as well as they should. This is because the teachers do not have high enough expectations of their learning. Leaders need to adapt the curriculum so that it better meets the needs of disadvantaged pupils and helps them to make stronger progress. Pupils do not develop a good understanding of cultures that are different from their own. This is because the curriculum does not provide pupils with opportunities to promote their understanding of different cultures in modern Britain. Leaders should ensure that the curriculum develops pupils’ cultural development more widely. Pupils’ behaviour and attitudes, although stronger aspects of the school’s 8–9 October 2019
p.4
5
provision, are not yet good. Where teaching and the curriculum are weaker, a minority of pupils can become distracted and disengaged. Additionally, the attendance of pupils at the school, although showing signs of improvement this year, remains low. Leaders need to ensure that these emerging strengths are further embedded, so that pupils’ attitudes to learning in lessons and their attendance improves. Leaders may appoint newly qualified teachers.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
If you’re not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.5
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.5
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 8–9 October 2019
p.5
School details
Inspection number 10110179 Type of school Primary
p.6
School details
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.6
Information about this school
The Bishop’s Church of England Primary Academy is a Church of England faith school located in the Diocese of Norwich. The religious character of the school was inspected under section 48 of the Education Act (2005) and was judged to be good. The school converted to become a sponsor-led academy on 1 November 2016. The Bishop’s Church of England Primary Academy is a member of the Diocese of Norwich Education and Academies Trust. The Bishop’s Church of England Primary Academy is larger than the average-sized primary school. The proportion of pupils who are in receipt of free school meals is in the top 20% of all schools nationally. The school manages a breakfast club.
p.6
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. 8–9 October 2019
p.6
7
In accordance with section 44(2) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than it might in all the circumstances reasonably be expected to perform.
p.7
7
Inspectors met with the headteacher, the deputy headteachers, the leader of the early years and the inclusion leader. Inspectors held discussions with two members of the local governing board and members of the Diocese of Norwich Education and Academies Trust, including the chief executive officer. During the inspection, inspectors carried out deep dives into early reading, mathematics, writing, physical education and history. This included discussions with leaders of each subject, visits to lessons, discussion with teachers, scrutiny of pupils’ class books and discussions with pupils. Inspectors examined a wide range of safeguarding documentation, including that relating to attendance and behaviour, the single central record and records of staff training. Inspectors spoke about safeguarding with the designated leader of safeguarding, other school leaders and teachers, including a newly qualified
p.7
7
teacher. Inspectors spoke with parents at the start of the school day. Inspectors also took account of the 18 responses to the Ofsted online questionnaire, Parent View, as well as the eight free-text responses. Inspectors also considered the 14 responses to the online staff survey. Inspectors spoke with pupils at playtimes and lunchtimes.
p.7
Inspection team
Steve Mellors, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Julie Harrison Ofsted Inspector 8–9 October 2019
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion