Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Solihull College & University Centre

Inspected 14 Mar 2019 · published 28 Apr 2019 · URN 130481

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Martin Ward

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    14 Mar 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Martin Ward

  • Postcode verified

    B91 1SB

  • Name on report verified

    Solihull College and University Centre

  • URN verified

    130481

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+47Positivemore positive than 48% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedmake good progresseffectiveeffectivelyclearstrengthshighly effectiveimproving
Criticismweaknessesfailpoorconcernfalling behindconcernsnot yettoo many

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
2,390
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Solihull College and University Centre Monitoring visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Martin Ward, Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.1

Type of provider: General further education college

p.1

Address: Blossomfield Campus Blossomfield Road Solihull West Midlands B91 1SB Monitoring visit: Solihull College and University Centre, 13-14 March 2019

p.1

Context and focus of visit

Solihull College’s previous full inspection took place in November 2016. Inspectors judged that the college was good. Stratford-upon-Avon College was inspected in September 2017 and inspectors judged the overall provision to require improvement. In February 2018 the two colleges merged; the new college is called Solihull College and University Centre. The focus of this monitoring visit was to evaluate the progress that leaders and managers have made in addressing the main areas for improvement identified at the most recent inspection of Stratford-upon-Avon College

p.2

Context and focus of visit

Solihull College and University Centre delivers vocational and academic education and training to young people and adults. The college operates from three main campuses: Blossomfield, near Solihull town centre; Woodlands, in the north of the borough of Solihull; and Stratford-upon-Avon. The Stratford-upon-Avon campus accounts for roughly a fifth of the full-time learners of the group. Since the merger, the governors and senior leaders have reduced the number of satellite centres, and restructured the staffing at the Stratford-upon-Avon campus.

p.2

Significant progress

Leaders and managers have rapidly improved the management, breadth and reliability of data. Managers accurately and comprehensively identify areas of strength and areas for improvement. Managers and staff spend time on the correct priorities.

p.2

Significant progress

Senior managers have produced a clear, evaluative and accurate self-assessment report. They identify the strengths and weaknesses that relate to the Stratford campus and include areas for improvement within the quality improvement plan. Managers are making considerable progress with most of the areas for improvement but fail to record the progress and impact of their actions. This reduces the effectiveness of the improvement plan as a way of measuring progress towards targets.

p.2

Significant progress

Senior Managers have introduced more frequent and regular opportunities for middle managers to review the progress of learners and courses. Managers review attendance, learners’ views, samples of work, and the number of learners who stay on courses. Where courses are causing concern, they take effective improvement Monitoring visit: Solihull College and University Centre, 13-14 March 2019 actions. For example, they have improved the quality of teaching and learning in level 2 business by sharing good practice with the teaching teams at the Solihull campus and increased attendance in catering and performing arts courses. Managers and teachers have improved outcomes in GCSE English, health and social care, and motor vehicle courses.

p.2

Significant progress

Leaders track and monitor the progress of learners and apprentices effectively. They have been swift to identify those who are underperforming. Assessors, tutors and teachers are effective in identifying the reasons for underperformance and, in most cases, help learners and apprentices to make good progress. Most learners are working at or above their aspirational target grade and making better progress than in the previous year. However, learners on level 3 business and information technology courses are making slower progress. Most apprentices are on track to achieve their qualification, with an increasing proportion due to complete on or before their planned end date.

p.3

Significant progress

Managers undertake regular reviews of learners’ work and staff comments. Staff receive helpful guidance on how to improve their written feedback. Staff in sport, health and social care, and level 1 motor vehicle courses are now providing more helpful feedback to learners.

p.3

Significant progress

Managers observe learning in classrooms or workshops regularly. Observers provide an improvement plan to the individual member of staff and a summary of the key strengths and areas for improvement to the management team. Managers have noted improvements in the checking of learning, and the effective use of questioning as a result of this process. Inspectors observed these improvements within teaching and learning and assessment during the visit.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Governors are committed to improving the quality of provision and the outcomes for learners at the Stratford campus. Governors receive regular information about the quality of teaching, learning and assessment and the progress that learners are making.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Managers inform governors regularly about actions to improve teaching and learning in the quality improvement plan. Some governors have taken part in learning walks through classrooms and have experienced the quality of teaching and learning directly. Individually, governors have had the opportunity to review the key strengths and weaknesses identified in the learning walks via the online governor dashboard. Monitoring visit: Solihull College and University Centre, 13-14 March 2019 In April 2018, senior managers produced a detailed report on the quality of teaching, learning and assessment at Stratford. Since that time, however, there has been no formal opportunity for the board as a whole to challenge senior managers on the quality of teaching, learning and assessment. Senior managers have produced a full report for April 2019. This is too long an interval since the previous report. Governors’ actions will be too late to have an impact on the experience of current

p.3

Reasonable progress

Governors receive information about attendance, enrolments and the proportion of learners who remain on their courses. In April 2018, governors agreed specific performance targets for the Stratford campus. Governors did not formally review outcomes against these targets, although the information was available within the self-assessment report. Governors did not provide senior managers with specific challenge on their performance and ask for explanations.

p.4

Reasonable progress

At the end of the year, senior managers provide governors with information about the progress that learners have made compared with their starting points. Governors challenge managers to explain the differences in performance between different courses. During the year, governors are informed of the proportion of learners who are meeting their aspirational target via the online dashboard. The dashboard is a positive development, but governors have not yet used the information to identify clear improvement actions for senior managers.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Senior leaders and governors have established working groups with a specific focus. One group focused on improving provision at Stratford. Members of this group demonstrated a good understanding of course reviews, courses that needed improvement, and those that were making progress. They challenged senior leaders appropriately.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Another group focused on improvements in English and mathematics courses. Members discussed the strategy for improving mathematics and English and provided appropriate support and challenge. Last academic year, learners achieved a larger proportion of high grades in English GCSE at Stratford.

p.4

Significant progress

Senior leaders and managers have acted swiftly to develop a curriculum for the learners at the Stratford campus, so that it meets the needs of local employers and communities. Leaders and managers have strengthened the relationships with the local enterprise partnership and the local business network. Managers have responded well to local labour market shortages in hospitality and catering. They have provided apprenticeships and expanded the range of level 1 courses across vocational areas. Monitoring visit: Solihull College and University Centre, 13-14 March 2019 Managers continue to develop courses in the cultural and theatrical sectors. They have built on their good relationships with the Royal Shakespeare Company and provided learners with high-quality learning experiences in a range of disciplines. Learners participate in workshops and real projects relating to acting, backstage design, customer care, lighting, and filming.

p.4

Significant progress

Senior leaders work closely with schools and local headteachers. Leaders have offered alternative vocational provision for a small number of pupils at key stage 4. Managers provide appropriate initial advice and guidance, and the pupils are making good progress.

p.5

Significant progress

Senior managers have improved the process for planning the curriculum. Managers consider detailed local market information, as well as the quality and availability of staff and resources. Senior managers have removed courses which were not popular, of poor quality, or that did not comply with the college’s clear purpose to serve local needs.

p.5

Significant progress

Managers consider the range of courses available at the Solihull campus and ensure that there is no unnecessary duplication of courses. Some students on the level 3 engineering apprenticeship at Stratford transferred to Solihull to complete the higher-level apprenticeship.

p.5

Significant progress

Managers have designed clear pathways for learners from level 1 to level 3 within study programmes. Where there is clear demand, learners can progress to level 4 and study at degree level. Managers have been successful in developing a more inclusive curriculum. Managers have increased the number of courses at level 1. Allied to the improved security around the college, these courses now attract more vulnerable learners.

p.5

Significant progress

Just over half of the learners move on to a higher level of learning in the same curriculum area in creative subjects, business, engineering, and sport. Most apprentices and study programme learners continue into employment or higher levels of training and study.

p.5

Reasonable progress

In most courses learners enjoy their learning and focus well on theoretical and practical activities. They develop their knowledge and technical skills and make good progress. For example, in dance, teachers gave feedback to learners on how to perfect their technique in the style of the choreographer Bob Fosse. Learners made significant progress during the session and most of them mastered the skill. Monitoring visit: Solihull College and University Centre, 13-14 March 2019 Teachers use questioning effectively to check learning. In an acting session, the tutor expertly challenged learners to reflect on their work and adapt the performance to make it even better. In a professional cookery lesson, the tutor used questioning skilfully to encourage learners to develop a menu for a customer who was lactose- intolerant. Within a childcare session, the teacher checked learning by asking learners to record the key points from the lesson. They then used questioning

p.5

Reasonable progress

effectively to see how well they could link their learning to the previous topics of food and nutrition.

p.6

Reasonable progress

On courses where learners cannot achieve higher grades than a pass, teachers set targets for learners that encourage them to extend their skills beyond what is required for the qualification. For example, in a professional cookery session the tutor challenged learners to improve the appearance and taste of the product.

p.6

Reasonable progress

On most courses teachers provide feedback to learners that is highly effective in helping them to improve. For example, in childcare they support learners well in the use of Harvard referencing, in preparation for studying in higher education. A minority of teachers identify where learners achieve the pass, merit or distinction criteria but fail to identify why the work was good, or how it could be improved further.

p.6

Reasonable progress

Teachers have produced a very useful feedback booklet in art that includes all the developmental feedback for the course. Learners keep the feedback in one place and refer to it. This enables them to make strong progress over time.

p.6

Reasonable progress

At the time of inspection, 79 apprentices were in learning at the Stratford campus. Equal numbers were on standards- and framework-based apprenticeships. Most apprentices study at level 2 in hospitality and catering.

p.6

Reasonable progress

Managers record accurately apprentices’ starting points and use this information to plan and provide their learning well. Assessors provide most apprentices with the appropriate guidance to help them to develop the knowledge, skills and behaviours needed for their roles.

p.6

Reasonable progress

Most apprentices benefit from routine visits from assessors who test their skills and related knowledge effectively. For example, in hospitality, the assessor questioned the apprentice on the topics of nutrition, health, safety and hygiene.

p.6

Reasonable progress

Apprentices receive clear oral feedback to help them improve their work. Most assessors encourage the most able apprentices to extend their work. For example, Monitoring visit: Solihull College and University Centre, 13-14 March 2019 the tutor challenges catering apprentices to use more complex skills, with one apprentice making their own pasta for minestrone soup.

p.6

Reasonable progress

Apprentices receive effective individual support to help them make good progress. For example, an apprentice with dyspraxia was able to discuss and present evidence rather than write reports. Apprentices who are falling behind in their work often receive additional individual sessions that enable them to catch up.

p.7

Reasonable progress

Assessors design reviews and detailed action plans to help apprentices to identify what they need to do to improve. In a few cases, assessors identify what is required to achieve the highest grades. Assessors work well with apprentices to set targets that are individual and specific.

p.7

Reasonable progress

Assessors provide feedback that helps apprentices to reflect on current practice and on their practical skills. However, assessors do not challenge apprentices effectively enough to achieve higher grades or to develop their English skills.

p.7

Reasonable progress

In too many cases, managers do not engage employers well enough in the apprentices’ reviews. As a result, apprentices are not clear about the professional behaviours that they need to demonstrate and improve at work. Monitoring visit: Solihull College and University Centre, 13-14 March 2019 the guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . Learner View Learner View is a website where learners can tell Ofsted what they think about their college or provider. They can also see what other learners think about them too. To find out more go to www.learnerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

Reasonable progress

Employer View Employer View is a website where employers can tell Ofsted what they think about their employees’ college or provider. They can also see what other employers think about them too. To find out more go to www.employerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

Reasonable progress

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to

p.8

Reasonable progress

the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

Reasonable progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

Reasonable progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion