Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Ryecroft Academy
Summary
Michael Reeves (lead), Andrew Soutar, Nicola Shipman
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
18 Sept 2019
- Inspectors verified
Andrew Soutar, Michael Reeves, Nicola Shipman
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Outstanding
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Outstanding
- Previous overall verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
LS12 5AW
- Name on report verified
Ryecroft Academy
- URN verified
140824
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementOutstanding
- Personal developmentOutstanding
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The early years leader knows what needs to be done to continue to improve children’s learning. p.3
- The curriculum developments and the school’s approach to assessment to check that pupils acquire and remember the appropriate knowledge in subjects such as science and geography now need to be embedded. p.4
- This work needs to continue to ensure the confidence of all parents of pupils with SEND and to improve the attendance levels of younger pupils. p.4
- Plans to use this area more effectively should be implemented. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance17
“Leaders’ work to secure pupils’ personal development is exceptional.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,254
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 56, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Ryecroft Academy Stonebridge Grove, Farnley, Leeds, West Yorkshire LS12 5AW
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Outstanding Leadership and management Outstanding Early years provision Good Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement 17–18 September 2019
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are very happy and safe. The headteacher and staff have created a caring, nurturing school where pupils achieve well. Pupils learn well in subjects such as reading, mathematics and writing. In some subjects, such as geography and science, they do not remember all the valuable information. Children settle quickly into Nursery and Reception classes. They make a good start with their learning.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils’ behaviour in school is good. Incidents of bullying are rare. Pupils know that staff will support them with any concerns, including bullying. Pupils learn how to live healthy lives and the qualities needed to be a successful citizen. Relationships with parents and carers and members of the surrounding community have improved. Many parents like the improvements in the school over the last two years. A very small number of parents of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) were not as positive. When inspectors looked at the provision for pupils with SEND, we found that staff plan carefully to meet the needs of these pupils. The Gorse Academy Trust has supported the school to improve. Training from the trust has helped leaders and staff to improve teaching. The trust has helped to make a good-quality school building for pupils to learn in.
p.2
better?
Leaders are determined that all pupils, including pupils with SEND and disadvantaged pupils, achieve as well as they can. Teaching in subjects such as reading, mathematics and physical education is well planned. Over the last two years, pupils’ achievements have improved greatly in these subjects. Planning in subjects such as science and geography is clear. However, pupils are not building their knowledge and remembering their learning as securely in these subjects. Leaders and staff are acting to address this. They have introduced assessments to check that pupils are remembering the important knowledge. Some of this work is not fully embedded, but there are clear plans in place to cement this approach.
p.2
better?
Staff apply the school’s behaviour policy consistently. They use praise effectively when pupils are meeting the school’s expectations. Pupils behave well in lessons. They mostly listen attentively and work hard. Behaviour at playtimes and lunchtimes is positive. Leaders use exclusions as a last resort. The number of exclusions has fallen over recent years. Good attendance has a high profile. Pupils’ attendance has improved and is better than that of schools in similar contexts. Leaders’ analysis notes that sometimes the attendance for younger pupils is not as strong. Bullying is rare and dealt with promptly by staff.
p.2
better?
Leaders’ work to secure pupils’ personal development is exceptional. This a particular school strength. Pupils enjoy an extensive range of opportunities for their personal development. This entitlement is particularly strong. Pupils have the chance to be a school councillor or an LGBTQ ambassador. This develops their understanding of democracy and diversity. Visitors into school raise pupils’ aspirations. They help pupils to consider different jobs, careers or education 17–18 September 2019
p.2
3
pathways for the future. The school helps pupils to know how to look after their physical and mental needs. Sport, healthy lifestyles teaching, yoga and mindfulness all contribute to pupils’ development. If pupils have any anxieties, they can visit ‘time to talk’ for support from staff.
p.3
3
Leadership is remarkably strong at all levels. The headteacher, well supported by other leaders and staff, has brought about substantial improvements to all aspects of the school. Clear plans for further improvement are in place. Governors know the school well and hold leaders to account effectively. Governors visit regularly to find out how the school is developing. They are vigilant to make sure that their statutory obligations are met. The trust has brought expertise to help improve leadership capacity and train staff. This has helped the school address its priorities promptly and systematically. Leaders carefully take account of staff workload. Responses to Ofsted’s staff survey and discussions with staff show that staff are incredibly positive about the way leaders consider their well-being.
p.3
3
Leaders and staff have taken determined action to engage with parents and the community. The headteacher and staff are highly visible at the start and end of the school day. Newsletters help parents know what is being taught. Workshops show parents how to help their child to learn at home. Visits to the local residential care home help pupils to contribute to the local community. Parental confidence in the school is high. The vast majority of parents who completed Ofsted’s survey, Parent View, would recommend the school.
p.3
3
Children settle quickly into Nursery. Home visits enable staff to know children before they start school. Once children are in school, staff teach them expectations and school routines. I saw staff patiently explaining to Nursery children how to move sensibly around school. Teaching of the early years curriculum is well matched to children’s needs. The early years leader knows what needs to be done to continue to improve children’s learning. For example, she has clear plans for the recently developed outdoor areas. Children’s achievements by the end of Reception have improved greatly over the past three years. However, there is still more to do to increase the proportion of children who are working at the standard to be ready for starting Year 1.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders, staff and governors give the highest priority to keeping pupils safe. There is a strong culture of safeguarding across the school. Well-trained staff promptly identify any safeguarding risks to pupils. They secure help for pupils and their families by working with a range of agencies. The school helps pupils and parents understand how to stay safe online. Leaders complete careful safeguarding checks for all staff, trustees, governors and volunteers. This ensures they are suitable to work with children. Pupils believe staff will help if they have any worries. 17–18 September 2019
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
A carefully sequenced curriculum in subjects such as geography and science has been introduced. However, pupils do not retain their learning as well as they do in reading, writing and mathematics. The curriculum developments and the school’s approach to assessment to check that pupils acquire and remember the appropriate knowledge in subjects such as science and geography now need to be embedded. Leaders and staff have worked hard to gain the confidence of the community and parents. This work needs to continue to ensure the confidence of all parents of pupils with SEND and to improve the attendance levels of younger pupils. The outdoor learning area has recently been developed in order to enhance the delivery of the early years curriculum. Plans to use this area more effectively should be implemented. Although the proportion of children attaining a good level of development by the end of Reception has increased, further improvements are
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
needed so that more children are prepared for the demands of Year 1.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you’re not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 17–18 September 2019
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10110596 Type of school Primary
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 17–18 May 2017
p.5
Information about this school
The school is part of The GORSE Academies Trust.
p.5
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
We met with a range of school and trust leaders, including the trust’s chief executive officer (CEO), the executive principal, principal, senior assistant principal, assistant principals and special education needs coordinator (SENCo). We considered five subjects in detail: reading, mathematics, geography, science and physical education. These deep dives included discussions with senior leaders and subject leaders, lesson visits, review of pupils’ books, discussions with pupils and discussion with teachers where inspectors completed lesson visits. We considered a range of safeguarding information and documentation provided by the school and available on the school’s website. We held discussions with a range of staff to consider their understanding of the school’s safeguarding procedures. A range of pupils told us how the school helps them to stay safe. I met with the school’s safeguarding officer to review safeguarding records. I
p.5
6
reviewed the single central record alongside the school business manager. We considered arrangements for pupil drop-off and collection at the start and end of the school day. We observed pupils’ behaviour across the school day, including at playtime and lunchtime. An inspector reviewed responses to the staff, pupil and parent surveys. We met with some parents at the start of the day and reviewed correspondence by email and letter.
p.6
Inspection team
Michael Reeves, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Andrew Soutar Ofsted Inspector 17–18 September 2019
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion