Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
15 Oct 2019
- Inspectors verified
John Mitcheson
- Postcode verified
IG7 5AB
- Name on report verified
The Anderson School
- URN verified
144775
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Too often, concerns about pupils’ safeguarding are not dealt with effectively. p.1
- Until recently, procedures for recording information about safeguarding concerns have been weak. p.1
- This influx of pupils corresponded with a sharp rise in incidents of poor behaviour, and fixed-term exclusions. p.1
- There have been some serious incidents of pupils not keeping themselves safe online, in their own time away from school. p.1
- Records show that there are too many gaps in the school’s information about the action taken by leaders to protect vulnerable pupils. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school does not meet the requirements of the schedule to The Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014 (‘the independent school standards’) and associated requirements that were checked during this inspection, as set out in the annex of this report. p.6
- Not all of the standards and associated requirements were checked during this inspection. p.6
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,260
- about usual (typical 1813)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 49
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
The Anderson School Enterprise Campus, Luxborough Lane, Chigwell, Essex IG7 5AB
p.1
Main inspection findings
Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils Paragraph 7, 7(a), 7(b) Leaders have not ensured that all arrangements to safeguard pupils are effective. Too often, concerns about pupils’ safeguarding are not dealt with effectively. Until recently, procedures for recording information about safeguarding concerns have been weak. Records show that there are too many gaps in the school’s information about the action taken by leaders to protect vulnerable pupils. Not all concerns are fully recorded. These weak procedures limit leaders’ ability to deal effectively with the safeguarding issues that they face. Paper files, and more recently electronic records, contain insufficient evidence of the actions taken by leaders to prevent similar safeguarding incidents from happening again. This year, leaders have updated the school’s safeguarding policy and implemented new arrangements to record all safeguarding matters systematically, by computer.
p.1
Main inspection findings
Training has taken place this term to enable staff to use these new procedures. This is at an early stage of implementation. There have been some serious incidents of pupils not keeping themselves safe online, in their own time away from school. In response, leaders have reduced pupils’ access to mobile phones during the school day and held some school-wide events to raise pupils’ awareness about the dangers online. However, there is little evidence about how leaders have supported individual pupils to modify their inappropriate use of technology to keep themselves safer when they are not at school. A small minority of pupils are persistently absent from school. A small number of pupils who left the school at the start of this year because their placements were terminated are still awaiting a new placement in another school setting. This presents a significant risk to their safety and welfare as staff are unable to account for the
p.1
Main inspection findings
whereabouts of these pupils all of the time. This standard, which was met at the school’s last standard inspection, is no longer met. Paragraph 9, 9(a), 9(b), 9(c) An updated behaviour policy has been shared with pupils to gain common agreement on the school’s ‘seven golden rules’. Pupils know the rewards and sanctions used to promote good behaviour. Pupils and staff who spoke with the inspector said school is a safe, friendly place to be. However, the school’s behaviour records and complaints from parents show a very high number of incidents occur each term. Leaders did not plan well enough for the increase in pupil numbers joining the school last year. This influx of pupils corresponded with a sharp rise in incidents of poor behaviour, and fixed-term exclusions. The records of sanctions imposed on pupils for poor behaviour are not recorded systematically. Leaders do not use all of the information they have, including incidents
p.1
Main inspection findings
logs, records of internal and fixed-term exclusions and terminations of contracts to provide an overview of the quality of behaviour. They do not use this information to inform their actions to improve behaviour. This standard which was met in the previous inspection, is no longer met.
p.2
Main inspection findings
Paragraph 10 There is a written anti-bullying strategy on the school’s website but this is a generic policy common to all schools managed by the proprietor. It is not effective because it has not been adapted so that it relates directly to the school’s context. Pupils told inspectors that at times, bullying does happen but feel that if they are concerned they know who to go to help them sort things out. Recent complaints received from parents show that parents have less confidence in staff to fully resolve incidents of bullying. This standard, which was met in the previous standard inspection, is no longer met.
p.2
Main inspection findings
Paragraph 11 There is a written health and safety policy on the school’s website but this is a generic policy common to all schools managed by the proprietor. It is not effective because it has not been adapted by leaders so that it relates directly to the school’s context and needs. Without these important changes, leaders are unable to show how effectively they implement the school’s health and safety policy. This standard, which was met in the previous standard inspection, is no longer met.
p.2
Main inspection findings
Paragraph 14 Leaders ensure that pupils are properly supervised within the school buildings and in the outside areas. Staff have received recent training on managing pupils’ behaviour and what to do when they are faced with very challenging behaviour. During the inspection, pupils conducted themselves well. They gather in friendship groups or play games at lunchtimes. All of them showed good relations with others and with staff. This standard remains met.
p.2
Main inspection findings
Paragraph 16, 16(a), 16(b) At the time of the inspection, there was no written risk assessment policy available on the school’s website. Therefore it is unclear what actions leaders take to reduce any risks identified and keep pupils safe. Leaders have implemented personalised plans for some but not all pupils in need of additional support with their behaviour. These documents show staff have assessed the hazards presented by individual pupils and put in place control measures to manage the risks involved. This standard, which was met in the previous standard inspection, is no longer met.
p.3
Main inspection findings
Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors Paragraph 18, 18(1), 18(2), 18(2)(a), 18(2)(b), 18(2)(c), 18(2)(c)(i), 18(2)(ii), 18(2)(iii), 18(2)(c)(iv), 18(2)(d), 18(2)(e), 18(3) The school’s single central record is complete and well maintained. The proprietor ensures that all necessary checks are made and recorded when appointing new members of staff. Paragraph 19(1), 19(2), 19(2)(a), 19(2)(a)(i), 19(2)(a)(i)(aa), 19(2)(a)(i)(bb), 19(2)(a)(i)(cc), 19(2)(a)(i)(dd), 19(2)(a)(ii), 19(2)(b), 19(2)(c), 19(2)(d), 19(2)(d)(i), 19(2)(d)(ii) The school’s single central record includes all of the necessary checks made when appointing temporary supply staff. Paragraph 20(6), 20(6)(a), 20(6)(a)(i), 20(6)(a)(ii), 20(6)(b), 20(6)(b)(i), 20(6)(b)(ii), 20(6)(b)(iii), 21(1), 21(2), 21(3), 21(3)(a), 21(3)(a)(i), 21(3)(a)(ii), 21(3)(a)(iii), 21(3)(a)(iv), 21(3)(a)v), 21(3)(a)(vi), 21(3)(a)(vii), 21(3)(a)(viii), 21(3)(b), 21(4), 21(5),
p.3
Main inspection findings
21(5)(a), 21(5)(a)(i), 21(5)(a)(ii), 21(5)(b), 21(5)(c), 21(6), 21(7), 21(7)(a), 21(7)(b) The proprietor ensures that all of the information contained in the school’s single central register is accurate and kept up to date.
p.3
Main inspection findings
Part 5. Premises of and accommodation at schools Paragraph 25 The proprietor ensures that the school premises and facilities are well maintained. Accommodation includes high-quality classrooms and specialist areas for teaching music, food, art and design technology, computing and physical education. The school site is fit for purpose. School grounds include suitable play equipment and spaces for socialising. Leaders have taken action to improve the fencing around the school to protect pupils and prevent them from accessing the school car park without permission. Pupils spoke positively of these improvements. Repairs have been made to the netting surrounding outdoor trampolines to ensure pupils’ safety and welfare. This standard remains met.
p.3
Main inspection findings
Part 6. Provision of information Paragraph 32(1), 32(1)(c) The school’s policy and procedures for safeguarding pupils are published on the school’s website and are available to parents. This standard remains met.
p.4
Main inspection findings
Part 7. Manner in which complaints are handled Paragraph 33, 33(a), 33(b), 33(c), 33(d), 33(e), 33(f), 33(g), 33(h), 33(i), 33(i)(i), 33(i)(ii), 33(j), 33(j)(i), 33(j)(ii), 33(k) The emergency inspection was prompted by a recent surge in complaints received from parents by Ofsted and the Department for Education (DfE). These complaints refer to concerns about pupils’ behaviour and safeguarding. Furthermore, the latest responses to Ofsted’s Parent View show that the parents who responded have significant concerns about the school and the ability of leaders to safeguard pupils. Leaders have revised the school’s complaints policy. This is available on the school’s website. It includes clear timescales and actions to manage complaints systematically and escalate matters if parents are not satisfied with the response. Despite this, not all parents have confidence in school leaders to deal with the issues
p.4
Main inspection findings
they have raised. Several of the complaints received are long-standing issues that in the views of parents have not been fully resolved. Sustained complaints from the same parents show that leaders have not responded well enough to the concerns raised. The implementation of the complaints policy is not effective. Leaders are well aware of the level of complaints made. They acknowledge that communication between school and some parents has broken down and that more needs to be done to restore relations. This standard, which was met in the previous standard inspection, is no longer met.
p.4
Main inspection findings
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools Paragraph 34(1), 34(1)(a), 34(1)(b), 34(1)(c) Since the previous inspection, the proprietorial body has failed to hold leaders to account for safeguarding pupils. Leaders have been unable to maintain good relations with some parents. Weekly newsletters, monthly coffee mornings and regular meetings with parents have been introduced to improve this and develop better communication. This is at an early stage of development. Currently, much of leaders’ time is absorbed dealing with parental complaints, due to the significant number and complex nature of the concerns raised. Experienced strategic leaders appointed by the proprietor earlier this year are providing further challenge and support for senior leaders. They make regular visits to the school to monitor the capacity of leaders to make improvements. They have quickly identified where the school’s strengths and weaknesses lie. They have
p.4
Main inspection findings
prompted improvements to the school site, early improvements in the management of safeguarding matters and a more robust management of staff. Since the last inspection, an established trustee has become the chair of a newly formed governing body. She knows what the school does well and what it needs to improve upon. As part of its work, the governing body aims to prioritise monitoring routinely the school’s safeguarding procedures and forging better relations with parents. As a result, there are standards in Part 3 and Part 7 that were met at the last standard inspection, which are no longer met. This standard remains unmet.
p.5
Compliance with regulatory requirements
The school does not meet the requirements of the schedule to The Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014 (‘the independent school standards’) and associated requirements that were checked during this inspection, as set out in the annex of this report. Not all of the standards and associated requirements were checked during this inspection.
p.6
School details
This inspection was carried out under section 109(1) and (2) of the Education and Skills Act 2008, the purpose of which is to advise the Secretary of State for Education about the school’s suitability for continued registration as an independent school.
p.7
School details
Type of school Other Independent Special School
p.7
School details
Of which, number on roll in sixth form N/A
p.7
School details
Annual fees (day pupils) £39,596 to £71,998
p.7
School details
Website www.autism.org.uk/services/nas- schools/anderson.aspx Email address theandersonschool@nas.org.uk
p.7
School details
Date of previous standard inspection 1–3 May 2018
p.7
Information about this school
The Anderson School caters for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities relating to autistic spectrum disorder, including pathological demand avoidance. It is based in new, purpose-build buildings in Chigwell, Essex. The numbers on the school roll have increased since its previous inspection, from 40 to 57 pupils. Since March 2019, the proprietorial body has appointed a director and assistant director of education to make regular visits to the school to monitor its work. Since the last inspection a newly established governing body will hold its first full meeting this term. All pupils have education, health and care plans and are placed by a range of local authorities. The proprietor is the National Autistic Society (NAS). The NAS is the proprietor of six other independent schools and special free schools that are registered with the DfE, as well as a school in Scotland.
p.7
Information about this school
In May 2017, the DfE commissioned Ofsted to conduct a pre-registration inspection. All of the independent school standards were deemed likely to be met. The school’s first standard inspection was conducted in May 2018. The school’s overall effectiveness was judged as requires improvement and two independent school standards were not met. These related to teaching, and leadership and management. The school submitted an action plan to Ofsted about how it was going to address the unmet standards. This plan was deemed not to be acceptable on 31 July 2018. The school re-submitted an action plan to Ofsted in December 2018. This plan was deemed acceptable.
p.8
Information about this inspection
The Department for Education, the registration authority for independent schools commissioned Ofsted to carry out this one-day emergency inspection. The inspection was carried out at no notice. It was carried out under section 109(1) and (2) of the Education and Skills Act 2008. The purpose of the inspection was to check the independent school standards relating to pupils’ safeguarding, their welfare and the ability of leaders to keep them safe. The inspector met with senior leaders, officers of the proprietorship, a small group of staff, and a small group of pupils belonging to the school council. The inspector held telephone calls with two representatives of Essex local authority. The inspector looked at a range of documents including the school’s policy and procedure for safeguarding, the single central record and other child protection records. He looked at other policies and information on the school’s website.
p.9
Inspection team
John Mitcheson, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.9
Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils
7 The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures that- – 7(a) arrangements are made to safeguard and promote the welfare of pupils at the school; and – 7(b) such arrangements have regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State. 9 The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor promotes good behaviour amongst pupils by ensuring that- – 9(b) the policy is implemented effectively; and – 9(c) a record is kept of the sanctions imposed upon pupils for serious misbehaviour. 10 The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures that bullying at the school is prevented in so far as reasonably practicable, by the drawing up and implementation of an effective anti-bullying strategy. 11 The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures that relevant health and safety laws are complied with by the drawing up and effective implementation of a written health and safety policy.
p.10
Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils
16 The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures that- – 16(a) the welfare of pupils at the school is safeguarded and promoted by the drawing up and effective implementation of a written risk assessment policy; and – 16(b) appropriate action is taken to reduce risks that are identified.
p.10
Part 7. Manner in which complaints are handled
33 The standard about the manner in which complaints are handled is met if the proprietor ensures that a complaints procedure is drawn up and effectively implemented which deals with the handling of complaints from parents of pupils.
p.10
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
34(1) The standard about the quality of leadership and management is met if the proprietor ensures that persons with leadership and management responsibilities at the school- – 34(1)(a) demonstrate good skills and knowledge appropriate to their role so that the independent school standards are met consistently; – 34(1)(b) fulfil their responsibilities effectively so that the independent school standards are met consistently; and – 34(1)(c) actively promote the well-being of pupils. guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
Parent View You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.11
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/ofsted .
p.11
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.11
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.11
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.11
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion