Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Inroads Essex Limited in Suffolk

Inspected 31 Oct 2019 · published 21 Nov 2019 · URN 1272657

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Angela Weston

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Inroads Essex Limited

  • Inspection date verified

    31 Oct 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Angela Weston

  • Helped and protected verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Inadequate

  • Name on report verified

    1272657

  • URN verified

    1272657

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Helped and protectedInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−82Very criticalmore positive than 9% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyenjoysafeimprovedstronglypositiveeffectiveconsistent
Criticismfailedat risklackinadequatefailureharmpoorinsufficient

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1164w−85
  • What needs to improve778w−52

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,941
about usual (typical 2286)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 50
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
4
typical 8
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 48%What needs to improve 32%About the inspection 19%

Full report text

Inspection report children’s home: 1272657 1 Registered provider: Inroads Essex Limited

p.1

Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this children’s home

A private organisation runs this children’s home. It is registered to provide care for up to four children whose primary needs are due to a learning disability or who have experienced trauma that has left them vulnerable.

p.1

Information about this children’s home

The registered manager left the post on 10 June 2019. A new manager was appointed but had not registered with Ofsted. The manager left his employment following the inspection.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

inadequate

How well children and young people are helped and protected inadequate

p.1

inadequate

The effectiveness of leaders and managers inadequate

p.1

inadequate

There are serious and/or widespread failures that mean children are not protected or their welfare is not promoted or safeguarded.

p.1

inadequate

Date of last inspection: 10 October 2018

p.1

inadequate

Overall judgement at last inspection: good

p.1

inadequate

Enforcement action since last inspection: none

p.1

Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement

10/10/2018 Full Good Inspection report children’s home: 1272657 2

p.1

Statutory requirements

This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.

p.2

Requirement Due date

The children’s views, wishes and feelings standard is that children receive care from staff who—

p.2

Requirement Due date

take their views, wishes and feelings into account in relation to matters affecting the children’s care and welfare and their lives. (Regulation 7(1)(b)(c)) 20/12/2019

p.2

Requirement Due date

The protection of children standard is that children are protected from harm and enabled to keep themselves safe.

p.2

Requirement Due date

In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to ensure— that staff—

p.2

Requirement Due date

assess whether each child is at risk of harm, taking into account information in the child’s relevant plans, and, if necessary, make arrangements to reduce the risk of any harm to the child;

p.2

Requirement Due date

that the home’s day-to-day care is arranged and delivered so as to keep each child safe and to protect each child effectively from harm;

p.2

Requirement Due date

that the premises used for the purposes of the home are designed, furnished and maintained so as to protect each child from avoidable hazards to the child’s health. (Regulation 12(1)(2)(a)(I)(b)(d))* 06/12/2019

p.2

Requirement Due date

The leadership and management standard is that the registered person enables, inspires and leads a culture in relation to the children’s home that—

p.2

Requirement Due date

helps children aspire to fulfil their potential; and promotes their welfare.

p.2

Requirement Due date

In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the 06/12/2019 Inspection report children’s home: 1272657 3 registered person to— lead and manage the home in a way that is consistent with the approach and ethos, and delivers the outcomes, set out in the home’s statement of purpose;

p.2

Requirement Due date

ensure that staff have the experience, qualifications and skills to meet the needs of each child;

p.3

Requirement Due date

ensure that the home has sufficient staff to provide care for each child;

p.3

Requirement Due date

understand the impact that the quality of care provided in the home is having on the progress and experiences of each child and use this understanding to inform the development of the quality of care provided in the home;

p.3

Requirement Due date

demonstrate that practice in the home is informed and improved by taking into account and acting on—

p.3

Requirement Due date

feedback on the experiences of children, including complaints received; and

p.3

Requirement Due date

use monitoring and review systems to make continuous improvements in the quality of care provided in the home. (Regulation 13(1)(a)(b)(2)(a)(c)(d)(f)(g)(ii)(h))* If the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005(a) applies to the home—

p.3

Requirement Due date

the registered person must ensure that the requirements of that Order and any regulations made under it, except for article 23 (duties of employees), are complied with in respect of the home. (Regulation 25(2)(b)) 14/11/2019

p.3

Requirement Due date

The registered provider must appoint a person to manage the children’s home if—

p.3

Requirement Due date

there is no registered manager in respect of the home; and

p.3

Requirement Due date

is not, or does not intend to be, in day-to-day charge of the home.

p.3

Requirement Due date

If the registered provider appoints a person to manage the 20/12/2019 Inspection report children’s home: 1272657 4 home, the registered provider must, without delay, give HMCI notice of—

p.3

Requirement Due date

the name of the person so appointed; and

p.4

Requirement Due date

the date on which the appointment takes effect. (Regulation 27(1)(a)(b)(i)(ii)(iii)(2)(a)(b)) The registered person must complete a review of the quality of care provided for children (‘a quality of care review’) at least once every 6 months.

p.4

Requirement Due date

In order to complete a quality of care review the registered person must establish and maintain a system for monitoring, reviewing and evaluating—

p.4

Requirement Due date

the quality of care provided for children;

p.4

Requirement Due date

the feedback and opinions of children about the children’s home, its facilities and the quality of care they receive in it; and any actions that the registered person considers necessary in order to improve or maintain the quality of care provided for children.

p.4

Requirement Due date

After completing a quality of care review, the registered person must produce a written report about the quality of care review and the actions which the registered person intends to take as a result of the quality of care review (‘the quality of care review report’).

p.4

Requirement Due date

supply to HMCI a copy of the quality of care review report within 28 days of the date on which the quality of care review is completed; and

p.4

Requirement Due date

make a copy of the quality of care review report available on request to a placing authority, if the placing authority is not the parent of a child accommodated in the home.

p.4

Requirement Due date

The system referred to in paragraph (2) must provide for ascertaining and considering the opinions of children, their parents, placing authorities and staff. (Regulation 45(1)(2)(a)(b)(c)(3)(4)(a)(b)(5)) 20/12/2019

p.4

Requirement Due date

* These requirements are subject to a compliance notice.

p.4

Inspection judgements

Inspection report children’s home: 1272657 5

p.5

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: inadequate

Managers have failed to ensure that children live in an environment that promotes their dignity and is free from hazards. At the time of the inspection, a wardrobe in a child’s bedroom was tied together with string. The string was replaced by a lock on the second day of the inspection. However, this does not encourage the child’s independence. A sash window’s fixings were broken, and it had not been secured to prevent it falling into the corridor, which is accessed by the children. A mattress is stored in the conservatory and is moved to a child’s bed when he comes to stay at the home. This has the potential to injure a child should the mattress fall on them. Aside from the hazard, the mattress is stored in a communal area of the home. This encroaches on children’s space and does not promote the child’s dignity. A child’s bedroom and the surrounding corridor smelt strongly of urine. The child’s parent raised this concern at the child’s review in June

p.5

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: inadequate

2019. The provider has not acted to address this promptly.

p.5

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: inadequate

Staffing levels are insufficient to ensure that children are monitored and supported in line with their care plans. Some shifts have consisted of an all-male staff team overnight. Although all-male staffing is not a concern in itself, managers have failed to consider whether there is a negative impact of this on the girls who need personal care help to manage incontinence and menstruation. A social worker said that she was not aware of agency and all-male staffing arrangements. Children do not receive care that ensures that their dignity is respected.

p.5

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: inadequate

Children do not routinely eat together with staff. This was raised as a shortfall at the last inspection. A manager said there is not a budget for the staff to eat with the children. Failure to ensure that children benefit from important social interactions such as mealtimes means that they miss out on opportunities that other children routinely enjoy in a family home.

p.5

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: inadequate

Arrangements for ensuring that children have good enough clothing are lacking. During the inspection, one child had three holes in her trousers and talked of having second- hand clothing. A staff member said that she brought bags of used clothing into the home for the children that her own child had outgrown. Managers were unclear about their arrangements with placing local authorities on providing clothing. These shortfalls mean that children do not experience care that helps them to develop a sense of identity and meets their individual needs.

p.5

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: inadequate

The children enjoy a range of social activities. All the children are in education. Social workers gave positive feedback on the children’s placements.

p.5

How well children and young people are helped and protected: inadequate

Staff restrain children regularly. Although the restraint is proportionate, failure to understand patterns and triggers means that not enough is done to prevent the need for it. One child was restrained 19 times in one month. Restraints are often triggered by a Inspection report children’s home: 1272657 6 specific routine. There were inconsistencies in the staff’s understanding of this routine. One child is regularly restrained in a state of undress. There is no debrief following these incidents, and efforts to seek the views of the child are insufficient. The child’s social worker said that she was not aware of the frequency of these incidents.

p.5

How well children and young people are helped and protected: inadequate

One child was restrained on the floor of a supermarket by two staff for a period of 10 to 15 minutes. Risk assessments detail that the children are unable to communicate that they are in pain. Measures to check if children require medical attention following restraint are poor. This lack of checking means that injuries arising from restraint may not be identified and acted on.

p.6

How well children and young people are helped and protected: inadequate

There is no impact risk assessment for the home, so risks posed by one child to another are not documented or reviewed. A child’s social worker described her child as ‘incredibly vulnerable to abuse’ due to her learning difficulties. Lack of consideration of each child’s needs and vulnerabilities when considering a new admission puts all of the children at risk of harm.

p.6

How well children and young people are helped and protected: inadequate

Measures for protecting children against the risk of fire were deficient. Fire doors did not close properly. These faults had been reported some months ago but not fixed. One fire door slammed shut, which poses a risk of children’s fingers getting trapped. The arrangements for fire safety checks were unsafe and records showed gaps in fire checks. During the inspection, the manager arranged for the necessary repairs to be undertaken. Failure to carry out regular and comprehensive checks on the safety of the building puts children at risk of injury.

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate

The responsible individual has failed to provide effective oversight of the home and practice, and to provide suitable supervision to the manager. The manager has failed to supervise staff effectively. These failings mean that staff have not been supported and their practice has not been scrutinised. Consequently, the quality of children’s experiences has not been sufficiently considered. This has resulted in a lack of individualised care and a lack of exploration of positive behaviour management strategies, which has been detrimental to the children.

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate

Staff who work at the home are not suitably vetted. The organisation’s policy on recruitment does not contain guidance on checking the suitability of staff who have lived or worked overseas. The provider has failed to undertake relevant international checks before employing staff. Unsuitable staff have been allowed to work at the home. At the beginning of the inspection, there was no system in place to verify the identity of agency workers. This put children at risk from unsuitable adults working at the home. The responsible individual has put measures in place to address these failings since the inspection.

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate

Poor oversight and monitoring mean that managers have not ensured that the physical environment is maintained to a satisfactory standard. The provider has not submitted the Inspection report children’s home: 1272657 7 required six-monthly monitoring report to Ofsted within the expected time frame. The report lacks essential details and does not adequately or accurately evaluate the care that children receive. Children’s views are not used to inform how the home is run. The ineffectual monitoring means that the widespread shortfalls that were identified at this inspection were not known by the responsible individual or the manager and had therefore not been acted on.

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate

The staff, children’s parents and social workers spoke about communication difficulties and a lack of clarity on children’s care arrangements.

p.7

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the differences made to the lives of children and young people. They watched how professional staff work with children and young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care provided. Wherever possible, they talked to children and young people and their families. In addition, the inspectors have tried to understand what the children’s home knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people whom it is trying to help, protect and look after.

p.7

Information about this inspection

Using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’, this inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. Inspection report children’s home: 1272657 8

p.7

Children’s home details

Registered provider: Inroads Essex Limited

p.8

Children’s home details

Registered provider address: Suffolk House 7 Hydra, Orian Court Addison Way, Great Blakenham, Suffolk IP6 0LW

p.8

Inspector

Angela Weston, social care inspector Inspection report children’s home: 1272657 9 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

Inspector

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspector

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

Inspector

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion