Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
10 Oct 2019
- Inspectorssingle source
Brian Oppenheim
- Postcode verified
SE14 6AN
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 1,069
- about usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mark Phillips Deptford Green School Edward Street New Cross London SE14 6AN
p.1
School
Following my visit to your school on 10 October 2019, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
School
The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.
p.1
School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection in order for the school to become good.
p.1
School
The school should take further action to:
p.1
School
replicate the improvements achieved in English, mathematics, history and geography in all subjects across the curriculum.
p.1
Evidence
During the inspection, I met with you, other senior leaders and members of the governing body. I also met with subject leaders and looked at their curriculum plans. I had a telephone conversation with a representative of St Marylebone Teaching School Alliance about its support for Deptford Green. I evaluated the school’s improvement plans. I met with two groups of pupils from Years 7 and 10. I visited classrooms with senior leaders. Together, we observed English, mathematics, history, geography and modern foreign languages lessons, in Years 7, 8 and 10.
p.1
Context
Since the previous section 5 inspection, which judged the school to require improvement, you have changed the school’s leadership structure. Five new leaders focus on the curriculum and pupils’ achievements, overseen by a director of studies. Revised pastoral responsibilities means that heads of year check pupils’ academic progress. A number of staff have left the school.
p.2
Main findings
You and senior leaders have established a well-defined vision that emphasises academic and personal development. Actions to tackle the areas for improvement identified at the last inspection are having a positive impact on pupils’ education. The new director of studies post has redirected the school’s efforts to raise standards by focusing squarely on the what is to be taught and how best to teach it. Heads of faculty, especially those for mathematics, English and humanities, are pushing hard to strengthen the curriculum and teaching. This work is ongoing but improvements to the quality of education are already noticeable.
p.2
Main findings
With governors, you have introduced important initiatives. Good-quality external support has helped the new heads of faculty get to grips with the role. Sensibly, you have brokered support from a teaching school to review subjects and develop the curriculum. It is too soon to see the full impact of this work on standards, but early signs are positive. Curriculum planning is increasingly thorough and teaching methods more consistent across subjects. From September, it is planned that the pupils in Years 7 to 9 will all follow the full National Curriculum, with GCSE and other option choices starting in Year 10.
p.2
Main findings
Training for teachers is an integral part of this improvement work. This term, the weekly training sessions have focused on the curriculum and the impact of teaching. Heads of faculty have received training to improve teaching and pupils’ outcomes. They are now using their knowledge to train other staff.
p.2
Main findings
A strong feature of the school’s improvement work is ensuring that pupils have the knowledge and skills they will need when they leave school. The focus on literacy is starting to pay dividends. Pupils’ literacy skills in Years 7 and 8 enable them to tackle work in other subjects, such as history and geography, with confidence. Focus is placed on developing skills such as organisation and resilience, as well as numeracy. Leaders are not simply paying lip service to these characteristics. They are integral to improving the curriculum, teaching and outcomes and feature in leaders’ vision.
p.2
Main findings
The curriculum leaders I spoke with said they are being held accountable for the quality of their faculty’s work. This is an important change. Greater clarity about their role and expectations is helping them to drive improvements to the curriculum. This includes decisions about what is taught and when, and how best to motivate pupils to learn. Curriculum leaders note that the training has provided a shared language with which to debate, agree and review the curriculum and teaching. They say that there is ‘a palpable difference’ in how staff understand the curriculum and teaching. Visits to classrooms confirm that this understanding is informing practice. Pupils say that teaching has improved. Lessons are ‘more structured’. Time to reflect and look again at topics means that ‘learning sticks in their minds’.
p.2
Main findings
Behaviour, in classrooms and during lesson changes, is good. Teachers manage behaviour well, making sure that there is little, if any, interruption to learning. Pupils are polite and welcoming to visitors. They say that behaviour is good and that bullying hardly ever happens. The school’s records confirm this. Pupils feel safe in school.
p.3
Main findings
The school’s plans to tackle the areas requiring improvement are strong. They reflect the areas identified in the last inspection. Plans align closely to the school’s vision and priorities. Significantly, the objectives set out in the plan are evident in lessons. The curriculum is being reviewed in every subject, and developing a clear rationale for the content, organisation and assessment of the curriculum is well under way.
p.3
External support
Your work to broker external support is most effective in contributing to improvements. Ongoing coaching and mentoring enables heads of faculty to develop their skills in providing strong leadership. This is already having a demonstrable impact on some subjects where the revised curriculum is well taught. There is clarity about what teachers want pupils to learn, and the order in which topics are taught.
p.3
External support
The support negotiated with St Marylebone Teaching School Alliance is especially strong. This is a long-term initiative, not a ‘quick fix’. The teaching school leader, development plans and teaching methods are all focused on getting sustainable improvements. While these are still early days, this initiative is already starting to move discussion about the curriculum into well-founded actions.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the Director of Children’s Services for Lewisham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion