Schools & FE · School monitoring visit
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
17 Oct 2019
- Inspectorssingle source
Michele Costello
- Postcode verified
LS15 8TA
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Urgently improve the behaviour of a sizeable minority of pupils, ensuring that: – there is a sustained improvement in pupils’ attendance – there is a further reduction in the number of fixed-term exclusions. p.3
- Improve the effectiveness of leaders, including governors, so that they can p.3
- The inspector visited some lessons with the principal. p.4
- During lesson visits the inspector scrutinised work in pupils’ books. p.4
- A meeting was held with a group of teachers and curriculum leaders. p.4
- The inspector also met with some new staff. p.4
- The inspector reviewed the school’s single central record, which includes the checks made on staff to ensure that they are safe to work with children. p.4
- Since the school was last inspected in January 2019, a new principal has been appointed. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,467
- about usual (typical 1570)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mr Jason Roberts John Smeaton Academy Smeaton Approach Barwick Road Leeds West Yorkshire LS15 8TA
p.1
Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of John Smeaton Academy
Following my visit to your school on 17 October 2019, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken since the school’s most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of John Smeaton Academy
The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses in January 2019. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of John Smeaton Academy
Following the monitoring inspection, the following judgements were made:
p.1
Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of John Smeaton Academy
Leaders and managers are not taking effective action towards the removal of the serious weaknesses designation.
p.1
Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of John Smeaton Academy
The school’s improvement plan is fit for purpose.
p.1
Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of John Smeaton Academy
The trust’s statement of action is fit for purpose.
p.1
Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of John Smeaton Academy
I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, and the chief executive officer of the multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Leeds. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website. Yours sincerely
p.1
The areas for improvement identified during the inspection that took
Rapidly improve the quality of teaching, so that it is at least consistently good across all subjects and leads to improved outcomes, by: – giving high-quality support to the considerable number of new members of staff, particularly those new to the profession – continuing to focus on professional development so that all teachers enable pupils to make good or better progress – ensuring that the quality of teaching and learning for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), including those with the most complex needs, improve rapidly – developing the skills of teachers, including in the sixth form, to consolidate and deepen students’ learning. Urgently improve the behaviour of a sizeable minority of pupils, ensuring that: – there is a sustained improvement in pupils’ attendance – there is a further reduction in the number of fixed-term exclusions. Improve the effectiveness of leaders, including governors, so that they can
p.3
The areas for improvement identified during the inspection that took
secure rapid and sustained improvement to teaching and outcomes for pupils by: – continuing to develop the skills of middle leaders so that all use the information from monitoring consistently to improve teaching, learning and assessment in their subjects – ensuring that the assessment arrangements for pupils in the complex learning difficulty provision are fit for purpose.
p.3
Evidence
The inspector observed the school’s work, scrutinised documents and met with the principal and the executive principal. The inspector met with two representatives from the United Learning Trust (the trust). A meeting was held with the designated senior leader for child protection and the leader for behaviour. A meeting was also held with the school’s attendance team. The inspector talked informally to pupils during lessons and breaktime. The inspector also met formally with a group of pupils from Years 9 and 11.
p.4
Evidence
The inspector visited some lessons with the principal. During lesson visits the inspector scrutinised work in pupils’ books. A meeting was held with a group of teachers and curriculum leaders. The inspector also met with some new staff.
p.4
Evidence
The inspector reviewed the school’s single central record, which includes the checks made on staff to ensure that they are safe to work with children.
p.4
Context
Since the school was last inspected in January 2019, a new principal has been appointed. The head of school at the previous inspection is now the associate principal. Thirty-one staff have left the school and 20 new members of staff have been appointed. A new curriculum leader for modern foreign languages and a new special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) have been appointed. The trust has seconded an assistant principal from another multi-academy trust to provide additional capacity.
p.4
Context
There will be no students in the sixth form next academic year.
p.4
improvement identified at the section 5 inspection
Since the previous inspection, support for teachers new to the profession has improved. There is now a weekly training programme. Those new to the profession meet their mentors regularly. Professional development for staff has focused on improving the quality of teaching. Staff are positive about the professional development they receive. However, they would appreciate more specific training in the subjects that they teach.
p.4
improvement identified at the section 5 inspection
Curriculum leaders have received support from subject advisers from the trust to help to develop and improve the curriculum. There is further work to do to ensure that all key stage 3 curriculum plans cover the scope of the national curriculum.
p.4
improvement identified at the section 5 inspection
Teachers plan opportunities for pupils to revisit previous learning, particularly in English and mathematics. However, there remain gaps in pupils’ knowledge and understanding due to a legacy of poor teaching. Some teachers do not ensure that pupils have a secure understanding of what they have learned before moving on to the next topic or activity. They do not address pupils’ misconceptions and gaps in their learning effectively enough so that they achieve well.
p.4
improvement identified at the section 5 inspection
Leaders have introduced a revised behaviour policy since the previous inspection. Pupils understand the behaviour policy. However, during the monitoring inspection, both staff and pupils expressed ongoing concerns about pupils’ behaviour. The behaviour of a sizeable minority of pupils continues to hamper the learning of others. Pupils say that disruption in some lessons is having a negative effect on their learning. Pupils told the inspector that they hear bad language regularly in school. Staff do not always feel supported to address pupils’ poor behaviour.
p.5
improvement identified at the section 5 inspection
While there was a reduction in fixed-term exclusions in the summer term last year, this trend has not been sustained. Fixed-term exclusions have increased since September 2019 and remain high, particularly in Year 9. The number of pupils removed from lessons due to poor behaviour remains too high. Leaders and the trust understand that improving pupils’ behaviour remains a main priority.
p.5
improvement identified at the section 5 inspection
There has been some improvement in pupils’ attendance since the previous inspection. Leaders have introduced new systems and procedures to tackle the high rates of pupil absence. The attendance of pupils in Years 7 and 8 has improved. However, the attendance of pupils in Years 9, 10 and 11 remains too low. The absence rates of disadvantaged pupils and pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) remain too high.
p.5
improvement identified at the section 5 inspection
Provision for pupils with SEND is beginning to improve. The specialist area within the school for pupils with complex learning difficulties has been enhanced since the previous inspection. This is now a more welcoming and nurturing environment for pupils. A new SENCo is now in post. She understands the strengths and weakness of provision for pupils with SEND. Pupils with complex learning difficulties are now attending some mainstream lessons to develop their independence. However, there is still work to do to ensure that targets for pupils with education, health and care plans specifically address their needs so that these pupils are supported appropriately to achieve well.
p.5
The effectiveness of leadership and management at the school
A new principal was appointed in September 2019. He is aware of the weaknesses that need to be addressed. A revised school improvement plan is now in place. Measurable small steps have been outlined in the plan so that leaders can review the effect of actions taken. Staff understand the main priorities for improvement. However, the rate of improvement has not been swift enough since the previous inspection. There remains a substantial amount of work to do to ensure that weaknesses are tackled more effectively. Following the previous inspection, a school improvement board was established to replace the governing body. Members of the school improvement board are aware that behaviour needs to urgently improve. A leader from the trust is working with the school to enhance provision for pupils with SEND. Provision for pupils with SEND is beginning to improve.
p.5
Strengths in the school’s approaches to securing improvement:
Since the previous inspection, curriculum leaders, working with subject advisers from the trust, have revised and developed subject curriculum plans. Curriculum leaders continue to develop the key stage 3 curriculum to ensure that the scope of the national curriculum is covered. For example, in history, leaders are developing curriculum plans further to include a local study. Leaders are ambitious for an increasing number of pupils to study the English Baccalaureate (EBacc). The number of pupils studying the EBacc has increased significantly in the last two years. In Year 10, 80% of pupils are studying the EBacc.
p.6
Weaknesses in the school’s approaches to securing improvement:
Leaders have not taken robust enough action to improve pupils’ behaviour and attitudes towards their learning since the school was last inspected. Fixed-term exclusions, and the number of pupils removed from lessons due to poor behaviour and low-level disruption, remain too high. Pupils’ behaviour continues to be a concern. The attendance of pupils in Years 7 and 8 has improved. However, attendance for pupils in Years 9, 10 and 11 remains too low. There has not been sustained improvement in pupils’ attendance since the previous inspection. Low attendance has a detrimental effect on pupils’ learning and progress. Gaps in pupils’ knowledge and understanding remain due to a legacy of poor teaching. Teachers are not routinely checking pupils’ understanding so that misconceptions and gaps in pupils’ learning can be addressed.
p.6
External support
The trust provides support for the school. This support is helping to improve the curriculum and provision for pupils with SEND. However, this support has not led to rapid enough improvements in pupils’ behaviour and attitudes since the previous inspection.
p.6
External support
An assistant headteacher has been seconded from another multi-academy trust to the school’s senior leadership team for four days per week. This is providing extra capacity within the senior leadership team.
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion