Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Walbottle Campus

Inspected — · URN 108524

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Moira Banks (lead), Debbie Redshaw

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Debbie Redshaw, Moira Banks

  • Postcode verified

    NE15 9TP

  • Name on report verified

    Walbottle Campus

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−5Mixedmore positive than 27% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositiveconsistentlyexcellenteffectivelyimprovedeffectivesuccessfulgood progress
Criticismpoornot alwayspersistent absenceweaknot improvedtoo oftenexclusionsdisrupt

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings832w+36
  • What needs to improve1432w−14

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
2,260
longer than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 36%What needs to improve 63%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mr Richard Harrison Acting Headteacher Walbottle Campus Hexham Road Walbottle Newcastle upon Tyne Tyne and Wear NE15 9TP

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Walbottle Campus

Following my visit with Moira Banks, Ofsted Inspector and Toni Spoors, Ofsted Inspector to your school on 22 to 23 October 2019, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken since the school’s recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Walbottle Campus

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection that took place in February 2019.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Walbottle Campus

Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Walbottle Campus

Leaders and managers are not taking effective action towards the removal of special measures.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Walbottle Campus

The local authority’s statement of action is fit for purpose.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Walbottle Campus

The school’s improvement plan is fit for purpose.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Walbottle Campus

The school may not appoint newly qualified teachers before the next monitoring inspection other than in English and mathematics.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Walbottle Campus

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Newcastle upon Tyne. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.1

February 2019

What does the school need to do to improve further?

p.3

February 2019

 Urgently improve the standard of behaviour and conduct of a significant minority of pupils in key stages 3 and 4 by: – training teachers to apply the school’s behaviour policy consistently and with authority, including ensuring that derogatory language is firmly challenged – making sure that staff and pupils understand the types of behaviour that are and are not acceptable – developing the skills of teachers and leaders to de-escalate poor behaviour and to nurture more positive attitudes to education – further developing the role and effectiveness of The Zone, the school’s internal alternative education provision – ensuring that part-time timetables used to reintegrate previously excluded pupils have a stated end point – rapidly reducing the use of exclusion to be more closely in line with levels seen nationally.  Improve the overall level of attendance and rapidly reduce the level of persistent absence by:

p.3

February 2019

– working more effectively with parents and carers so that they better understand the importance of excellent attendance and the negative effect of poor attendance on their children’s education – focusing more explicitly on the attendance of disadvantaged pupils.  Rapidly improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment so that pupils make consistently good progress across different subjects by: – raising expectations and ensuring that teachers provide challenging topics that reinforce and build on what pupils, and students in the sixth form, already know and can do – ensuring that teachers plan and use more probing questions to check on and deepen pupils’ understanding – ensuring that all teachers address errors in pupils’ spelling, punctuation and grammar so that they improve their writing skills – ensuring that guidance in the support plans of pupils with SEND are used by teachers to improve their access to the curriculum and to accelerate their progress

p.3

February 2019

– providing training for teachers on the day-to-day strategies they can use to accelerate the progress of disadvantaged pupils.  Improve the effectiveness of leadership and management by: – monitoring more closely the effect of actions taken to improve the school by checking more on the difference that actions are making in the classroom – strengthening the skills of middle leaders so that they become more influential in raising the expectations of their colleagues – improving the quality of support received by pupils with SEND – ensuring that governors and leaders monitor closely and refine current strategies to improve attendance, accelerate the progress of disadvantaged pupils and improve pupils’ reading skills – ensuring that all members of staff help to foster pupils’ character and promote pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development so that all pupils are well prepared for life in modern Britain.

p.3

Evidence

Inspectors observed the school’s work. They analysed documents and met with the acting headteacher and members of the senior leadership team. They also met with curriculum leaders, pupils, teaching and non-teaching staff, members of the governing body, and a representative from the local authority. A telephone conversation was held with the chief executive officer of Northern Education Trust. Inspectors also looked at safeguarding records and made visits to lessons alongside senior leaders.

p.5

Context

Since the previous inspection, there have been a number of changes. The school is subject to an academy order and this is in the process of being brokered with Northern Education Trust. The previous headteacher has recently retired and a deputy headteacher is now acting headteacher. Since the previous inspection, 26 members of staff, including 14 teachers, have left the school. Thirty new staff have joined the school, including 19 teachers. The local authority has brokered different packages for school support, including a service level agreement with Northern Education Trust for a support package for the school which is due to begin in November 2019.

p.5

improvement identified at the section 5 inspection

Leaders’ actions since the previous inspection have not improved the quality of education in the school. Outcomes for the Year 11 pupils who left the school in the summer of 2019 were weak. Provisional progress information shows that pupils underachieved.

p.5

improvement identified at the section 5 inspection

More recently, leaders have recognised the need to go ‘back to basics’ with expectations for pupils in lessons. A format for the structure of lessons is now in place and staff are beginning to use it. For example, more teachers are ensuring that pupils are quiet when teachers are addressing the class. It is too soon to see whether this more structured start to lessons is enabling pupils to know more and remember more.

p.5

improvement identified at the section 5 inspection

Teachers use a variety of questions to check pupils’ understanding and learning. However, too often, pupils are unable to answer questions about their learning. This is because pupils have gaps in their knowledge. Leaders say that they are working hard to ensure that pupils in the current Year 11 have a better chance of success. They say that the support from Northern Education Trust after October half term will help them to ensure that Year 11 pupils can achieve well in their GCSE examinations this year.

p.5

improvement identified at the section 5 inspection

The employment of a primary school teacher is helping pupils in Years 7 and 8 to learn more. There are better opportunities for pupils to practise their literacy and mathematics. Through this work, staff are also becoming more aware of how much pupils should know and be able to do when they join the school from primary school. This is beginning to raise teachers’ expectations of what pupils can achieve. It is too soon to see the impact of this work, which began in September 2019.

p.6

improvement identified at the section 5 inspection

There is a new inclusion lead at the school. They are working with the special educational needs coordinator (SENCo), who is also new to post. They have improved the information that is available to teachers about pupils’ special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). They have also assigned ‘key workers’ to pupils to help them with their learning and emotional and social well-being. Teachers are more aware of the SEND documentation that is available. It is too soon to see whether this is enabling teachers to be more effective in meeting the needs of pupils with SEND.

p.6

improvement identified at the section 5 inspection

Following the previous inspection, curriculum leaders began a review of the curriculum. An example of this is the development of a new subject, ‘the world around us’. This subject combines personal, social, health and economic education (PSHE) with religious education (RE). Pupils are beginning to learn more about life in modern Britain and about different religions, cultures and backgrounds.

p.6

improvement identified at the section 5 inspection

At the previous inspection, inspectors identified that teachers did not apply the behaviour policy effectively. Recently, leaders have made some changes to the policy. This includes the use of a ‘hot desk’ room to support pupils who are removed from mainstream lessons because of their behaviour. Teachers say that this is a positive step. Pupils say, and school records show, that behaviour remains an issue. Pupils’ learning is still too frequently disrupted by other pupils’ poor behaviour. Pupils also say that not all teachers deal with misbehaviour consistently well. This is because some teachers put up with more than others.

p.6

improvement identified at the section 5 inspection

During this inspection, inspectors heard little derogatory language. Pupils say that if teachers hear bad language, they address it immediately. Pupils say that they do hear derogatory language and swearing frequently. This includes on the school buses. There is much work to do to change the school culture so that pupils self- regulate their language.

p.6

improvement identified at the section 5 inspection

Leaders use exclusions when pupils fight, smoke in school or continually disrupt lessons. There is a reintegration meeting following an exclusion, which pupils and parents must attend. The number of fixed-term exclusions is lower so far this academic year. This is a positive step, but exclusions still remain too high.

p.6

improvement identified at the section 5 inspection

Teachers and staff do not always take a proactive approach to behaviour management. For example, when pupils begin ‘play-fighting’ or tugging each other’s clothes, teachers do not always stop them from doing so. This can then escalate and result in pupils fighting more seriously. This sometimes occurs in social time. In lessons, most pupils are compliant and follow teachers’ instructions. However, some pupils are rude to teachers and argue with them when asked to comply. Lunchtime staff and pupils say that there is pushing and shoving and that teachers are not consistent in addressing these issues.

p.6

improvement identified at the section 5 inspection

Some pupils spend time in ‘the zone’. This is an area where pupils attend when they have been placed on a part-time timetable. Improvements have been made to this area of the school, for example there is now a structure in place for pupils to complete work in English, mathematics and science. Pupils are also expected to spend some time reading. Although this is an improvement, pupils are not accessing work from the wider curriculum, which means they do not keep up with all of their subjects. Pupils who are on part-time timetables now have clear dates for reintegration back into mainstream classes. Most pupils spoken with in ‘the zone’ valued the time they had spent there and felt they would be more successful when back in mainstream classes. Most pupils’ attendance improves while they are in ‘the zone’. This is in part due to positive relationships that staff are building with parents.

p.7

improvement identified at the section 5 inspection

Pupils’ attendance overall is not improving rapidly enough. Attendance remains a significant concern. This is particularly the case for pupils who are disadvantaged and for those with SEND. Persistent absence is well above the national average. It is higher this year than for the same period in the last academic year. Leaders have tried different strategies, and some have worked but then the strategies have been changed. Pupils need to recognise that they have a responsibility to attend school regularly and make every effort to do so.

p.7

improvement identified at the section 5 inspection

Leaders have begun to take more action recently to improve the school. These actions are based on advice and guidance from external support. Actions are also leaders’ own ideas of what needs to improve. These are in the school development and post-Ofsted action plan. The action plan contains appropriate ideas and strategies for school improvement. While these actions are valid, it is not possible to see how they are improving the school. This is because it is too soon following implementation. The plan also does not set out specifically enough when leaders will evaluate the effectiveness of their actions.

p.7

improvement identified at the section 5 inspection

Curriculum leaders have visions for their subject areas. They have worked with primary schools to make changes to the key stage 3 curriculum. This to ensure that work builds on pupils’ prior knowledge and understanding. The impact of this more challenging curriculum is not yet clear. Curriculum leaders accept that there is a lot of work to do with pupils in key stage 4 who will not benefit from this improved curriculum. They also accept that there is a lot to do to ensure a consistent approach from all staff in their subject areas.

p.7

improvement identified at the section 5 inspection

The sixth-form leader is knowledgeable and passionate. She is dedicated to ensuring that students in the sixth form are successful. She is implementing systems to ensure that if students fall behind, there is rapid support to ensure that they are quickly brought back on track. Students are improving their attendance in the sixth form. Work remains to ensure that students have a secure grounding in key stage 4. This will allow them to make more effective progress when they enter the sixth form. There is some work to do to ensure that students select the right courses and transition from Year 12 to 13 successfully.

p.7

improvement identified at the section 5 inspection

Governors have a clear understanding of the position the school is in. They are aware that actions to improve the school need to happen more swiftly. Governors know that there is insufficient capacity in the school to do this currently. They are very happy with the brokered service level agreement with Northern Education Trust. Governors say that the current leaders are doing what they can to ‘steady the ship’. They expect that rapid improvement will take place when the school becomes an academy.

p.8

External support

Since the previous inspection, there has been a large amount of additional support put in place. This includes various support brokered through the local authority and brokered by the previous headteacher. The impact of this support is seen in the development plan. This has been improved by the acting headteacher alongside his headteacher mentor. It is too soon to see the full impact of the most recent external support.

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion