Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Whittington Green School

Inspected 16 Oct 2019 · published 14 Nov 2019 · URN 112958

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Vondra Mays (lead), Dick Vasey, Lynn Cox

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    16 Oct 2019

  • Inspectors verified

    Dick Vasey, Lynn Cox, Vondra Mays

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    S41 9LG

  • Name on report verified

    Whittington Green School

  • URN verified

    112958

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+20Mostly positivemore positive than 49% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseimprovedpositiveenjoyeffectivestrongambitiouspolitecaring
Criticismnot good enoughconcernsgapsnot metlackinconsistentnot yetlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1039w+24
  • Safeguarding98w−9
  • What needs to improve28w—

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,127
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Plain English
Flesch 60, typical 56
Average sentence
12 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 65%Safeguarding 6%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 27%

Full report text

Inspection of Whittington Green School High Street, Old Whittington, Chesterfield, Derbyshire S41 9LG

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement 15–16 October 2019

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils and staff know each other well in this small secondary school. Pupils are polite and caring and get along well together. They talk to visitors and make them feel very welcome. Pupils behave well. Inspectors saw pupils and staff working together in a positive and respectful manner. Older pupils told us that the school has improved in the last few years.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders want pupils to achieve well. Pupils are keen to take part in and enjoy the activities that leaders and teachers provide. They are now achieving well in some subjects. However, in other subjects, such as English, pupils do not learn important knowledge and remember it well enough.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders care a great deal about pupils’ well-being. They provide pupils with a wide range of learning experiences. Examples include battlefield trips, public speaking and the annual activity week. During the inspection, pupils were learning how to start a heart. There are plenty of clubs for pupils to get involved with. These range from themes such as gardening to climate change and photography. When bullying does occur, pupils are clear that staff deal with it well. Pupils also told us they feel safe in school.

p.2

better?

Leaders have improved some areas of the school’s curriculum. Pupils are achieving better than they have done in the past. Although improving, the quality of education is not yet good in all subjects. Some subject plans are new, or not developed well. Suggested approaches to teaching are not precise enough. Pupils do not deepen their knowledge or master the skills they need. They do not achieve as well as they should. This is especially true in English. The focus on reading is not as sharp as it should be to improve pupils’ reading skills. Some pupils are not fluent readers. Leaders have introduced new approaches to broaden pupils’ vocabulary.

p.2

better?

In other subjects, especially in mathematics and science, pupils achieve well. Subject leaders provide detailed plans explaining what to teach and when to teach it. Teachers use strong subject knowledge to help pupils build up knowledge over time. Pupils told us that teachers’ clear explanations in mathematics help them understand their learning. Teachers check what pupils can remember. In science, pupils recall information well from topics studied in the past. Pupils make effective use of this remembered information in new learning.

p.2

better?

Pupils begin their GCSEs in Year 9. Leaders have reduced the teaching of religious education in key stage 4. Some subject content is not taught and pupils have gaps in their knowledge.

p.2

better?

Leaders do not check that staff follow the agreed approaches well enough. They provide staff with training to help them deliver their subjects. They do not, however, 15–16 October 2019

p.2

3

make sure that the training gives teachers the knowledge they need.

p.3

3

The curriculum makes a significant contribution to pupils’ personal development and behaviour. Leaders have improved pupils’ behaviour and their attendance. Pupils understand right and wrong. They grow in self-confidence and develop strength of character. They learn about substance abuse, financial management and making different choices. This helps prepare pupils well for life in modern Britain. Pupils told us that it is ‘fine to be different’. Leaders also provide pupils with comprehensive careers advice and guidance.

p.3

3

The provision for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) is not good enough. Pupils’ personal development is promoted well. However, their academic needs are not met well. Leaders do not identify pupils’ learning needs accurately. Pupils’ support plans do not contain the detail required to meet their needs. Staff do not make sure that activities help pupils learn well enough.

p.3

3

The implementation of leaders’ plans is not checked thoroughly. Governors are, therefore, not able to measure improvement as accurately as they should. Leaders have worked hard to build positive relationships with parents. Staff enjoy working at the school.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Staff know pupils, their families and the local community well. Leaders check on the suitability of staff to work with pupils. Staff attend regular safeguarding training. They know how to raise any concerns they may have about a pupil. Pupils learn about risks they may face and how to keep themselves safe. The comprehensive personal, social and health education programme contributes well to this. Leaders check on vulnerable pupils through the pastoral system. They respond well to any concerns reported. They make sure that pupils get the extra support they may need.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Pupils in Year 9 do not cover effectively some subject content. New content is either not provided or taught too superficially. This leads to gaps in pupils’ knowledge in some subjects. Some pupils in key stage 4 have limited time to study religious education. Leaders need to rectify any narrowing of or omissions in the curriculum.  The effectiveness of subject leaders’ planning, sequencing and implementation of the curriculum is not good enough in some subjects, particularly in English. Senior leaders should support subject leaders to construct their curriculum plans. These plans should be consistently well delivered. Some pupils do not have well- embedded reading skills. This results in them having a lack of confidence in, and not enjoying, their reading. Leaders need to ensure that reading sits at the heart 15–16 October 2019

p.3

4

of the curriculum.  Teachers’ expertise is not consistent. Some teachers do not follow the curriculum plans as well as they should. Leaders do not check, as thoroughly as they should, how well teachers deliver the plans. This results in an inconsistent approach to improving the quality of education. Leaders need to check more carefully that their plans are being followed. They also need to ensure that teachers have the precise subject knowledge and skills to deliver the plans well.  Pupils with SEND are not securely provided with the academic support they need. Their support plans do not help teachers modify their lesson planning carefully enough. Leaders should ensure that the curriculum is ambitious for pupils with SEND. They should ensure that teachers consider pupils’ needs when planning activities and provide pupils with the support they need to achieve well.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you’re not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 15–16 October 2019

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10110037 Type of school Secondary comprehensive

p.5

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 16–17 May 2017

p.5

Information about this school

 The school does not use alternative provision.

p.5

Information about this inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 The inspectors held meetings with the headteacher, senior leaders, middle leaders and other staff. Inspectors met with four members of the governing body and a local authority representative.  Inspectors looked in detail at four subjects: English, mathematics, science and history, to consider the quality of education. They also looked more broadly at a range of other subjects. Inspectors visited 22 lessons, many with leaders. They met with teachers, subject leaders and pupils, and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors also heard some pupils read and observed pupils’ breaktimes and lunchtimes.  Inspectors looked at a range of other documentation, including that relating to safeguarding, behaviour and attendance. Inspectors also looked at leaders’ evaluation of the school’s performance and plans for improvement. Inspectors 15–16 October 2019

p.5

6

reviewed and considered the information on the school’s website.  Inspectors took account of the 42 responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, including 25 free-text responses. They also considered the school’s own parental survey. Inspectors reviewed the 22 responses to the staff survey and the 50 responses to the pupil survey.

p.6

Inspection team

Vondra Mays, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Dick Vasey Ofsted Inspector 15–16 October 2019

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion