Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Saint Edmund Arrowsmith Catholic High School
Summary
Emma Gregory (lead), Dawn Farrent, Denah Jones, Erica Sharman
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
18 Sept 2019
- Inspectors verified
Dawn Farrent, Denah Jones, Emma Gregory, Erica Sharman
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Inadequate
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
L35 2XG
- Name on report verified
Saint Edmund Arrowsmith Catholic High School
- URN verified
135481
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationInadequate
3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- A poorly designed curriculum and weaknesses in how it is delivered hampers pupils’ chances of attaining well in GCSE examinations. p.2
- Poor curriculum design in the past had led to large gaps in pupils’ knowledge. p.4
- Although provision for pupils’ personal development has improved, it is not good enough due to weaknesses in the taught curriculum. p.4
- Even so, the quality of the school’s work to provide for all pupils’ personal development is not good enough. p.3
- This is due to weak planning of the curriculum. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- They understand what they must do if they have concerns about a pupil. p.3
- Over time, leaders have failed to make it clear to teachers what pupils need to know and be able to do. p.2
- Leaders need to ensure that the new curriculum reflects the school’s context and enables pupils to make up for the essential building blocks that they have missed over time. p.4
- Teachers do not make clear to pupils what they must remember. p.2
- Leaders must also make sure that pupils’ experience of the curriculum is what they intend it to be. p.4
- Leaders must adapt the curriculum so that these pupils have an equal chance to succeed. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,228
- shorter than usual (typical 1552)
- Reading level
- Plain English
- Flesch 60, typical 53
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 6
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Saint Edmund Arrowsmith Catholic High School Cumber Lane, Whiston, Liverpool, Merseyside L35 2XG
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Inadequate 17–18 September 2019
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils do not fare well at this school. They are ill-prepared for the next stage of their life. A poorly designed curriculum and weaknesses in how it is delivered hampers pupils’ chances of attaining well in GCSE examinations. Some teachers’ expectations of what pupils can achieve academically are not high enough. Leaders’ actions to improve pupils’ achievement have been unsuccessful.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are confident that behaviour is getting better, although a minority of pupils still choose not to behave as they should in class. Corridors around the school are generally calm. Even so, some younger pupils do not like it when older pupils push in front of them in the lunch queue.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils say that they feel safe at school. They are confident that staff will look after them. Pupils told us that if they report bullying, staff will deal with it. They say that bullying is rare, and they appreciate the work of their peers as ‘bully busters’. That said, a small number of pupils are hesitant to report bullying to a member of staff.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Some pupils are involved in extra-curricular activities. A small number of pupils take part in sporting activities, music lessons and the Duke of Edinburgh’s Award scheme. Pupils are keen to support good causes, such as the local food bank.
p.2
better?
Up until very recently pupils have experienced a muddled curriculum. This has stopped pupils achieving well. Over time, leaders have failed to make it clear to teachers what pupils need to know and be able to do. Many pupils have not covered the subject content that they should have. This has got in the way of their learning in several subjects. This means pupils have struggled to succeed in external examinations. In turn, this has stopped them from making the best possible start on their future careers.
p.2
better?
Although recent actions have been implemented too late for many pupils, some action is now being taken to improve the quality of education that pupils receive. Subject leaders have created new curriculum plans which show what pupils should learn and when this should happen. Even so, this change for the better is only just starting. The current offer does not meet the needs of those pupils who have large gaps in their knowledge. It does not take enough account of the school’s context, nor does it help teachers to support those pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).
p.2
better?
Teachers do not make clear to pupils what they must remember. There are now some opportunities for pupils to go back to earlier learning. That said, teachers do not use this time well to check on pupils’ knowledge and rectify their mistakes. For example, pupils’ errors in their basic number calculations hamper their learning of 17–18 September 2019
p.2
3
Pupils’ behaviour in lessons is mainly respectful, but some pupils do not follow the rules well enough. That said, behaviour has improved. Fewer pupils are excluded from the school than used to be the case. Leaders also ensure that more pupils attend school regularly. However, some pupils do not attend school as often as they should.
p.3
3
Leaders have introduced more opportunities to build pupils’ confidence and prepare them for adulthood. For example, a small number of pupils take part in the Duke of Edinburgh’s Award scheme and the Police Cadet scheme. There are also some initiatives which allow pupils to volunteer in the community. For instance, some pupils have recently created hampers for a local food bank. Other pupils are active members of the student council. This helps them to develop their understanding of democracy. Even so, the quality of the school’s work to provide for all pupils’ personal development is not good enough. This is due to weak planning of the curriculum. Opportunities for pupils to develop their talents and interests at school are also limited.
p.3
3
In the past, leaders have removed a small number of Year 11 pupils from the school register. These pupils attended alternative provision. This was not done with the pupils’ best interests in mind. Leaders ensure that this does not happen anymore.
p.3
3
The new headteacher has an accurate view of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. She has prioritised her actions appropriately. For example, she has repaired many of the broken relationships between leaders and staff. Staff say that leaders consider their well-being and their workload. They also feel that leaders support them well to manage pupils’ behaviour. Staff are confident that pupils’ behaviour affects teaching much less than it has done previously.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Staff receive appropriate safeguarding training. They understand what they must do if they have concerns about a pupil. Pupils say that there are adults in school who they can turn to if they have any worries.
p.3
Safeguarding
Pupils learn about how to keep themselves safe. This includes learning how to stay safe online. Leaders ensure that pupils and staff are kept informed about safeguarding risks in the local area.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
While positive steps have been taken to renew the curriculum offer, it is still early days. Leaders must ensure that the new subject curriculums are implemented effectively so that pupils’ new knowledge and skills build on what has been 17–18 September 2019
p.3
4
taught before, towards clearly defined end points. Leaders must also make sure that pupils’ experience of the curriculum is what they intend it to be. Poor curriculum design in the past had led to large gaps in pupils’ knowledge. In turn, this has stopped them from succeeding in external examinations. Leaders need to ensure that the new curriculum reflects the school’s context and enables pupils to make up for the essential building blocks that they have missed over time. The current curriculum does not meet the needs of pupils with SEND. Leaders must adapt the curriculum so that these pupils have an equal chance to succeed. Teachers do not use time to best effect to revisit learning or to tackle pupils’ misconceptions. Teachers must ensure that pupils’ knowledge is secure before they move on to new ideas. Teachers must use these opportunities well to check on pupils’ understanding so that they can identify and address pupils’
p.4
4
misconceptions. Too many pupils continue to miss school. Leaders must continue to improve pupils’ attendance, particularly the attendance of disadvantaged pupils and those pupils with SEND. Although provision for pupils’ personal development has improved, it is not good enough due to weaknesses in the taught curriculum. Leaders must ensure that pupils’ opportunities for personal development are of a consistently high quality and pupils have more chances to develop their talents and interests. The school may appoint newly qualified teachers.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
If you’re not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 17–18 September 2019
p.4
School details
Local authority Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council
p.5
School details
Inspection number 10056300 Type of school Secondary comprehensive
p.5
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 3–4 May 2017
p.5
Information about this school
There have been several changes in the leadership of the school since the previous inspection. The headteacher was appointed in September 2018. The governing body was reconstituted in November 2017. A new chair of governors was appointed in September 2018. The school’s last section 48 inspection took place on 10 March 2016. The school currently uses alternative provision at Harmonize Academy, New Horizons and Everton Free School to contribute to the education of a small number of key stage 4 pupils.
p.5
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. In accordance with section 44(1) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. 17–18 September 2019
p.5
6
During the inspection, we spoke with pupils, about their learning and their school. We had meetings with senior leaders, subject leaders, teachers and other members of school staff. As the lead inspector, I spoke with a school improvement partner, a representative from the Archdiocese of Liverpool and a representative from the local authority. We reviewed school documentation. This included leaders’ evaluation of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. We also reviewed minutes of governing body meetings and considered information about pupils’ attendance and behaviour. We checked on safeguarding documentation, including the school’s appointment checks on staff. We also spoke to representatives of the alternative providers used by the school. We considered the views expressed by parents in the 21 responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, including the comments received via the free-text
p.6
6
facility. We considered the 165 responses to a questionnaire for pupils and the 40 responses to a questionnaire for staff. The inspection focused deeply on science, mathematics, geography and art. We visited lessons, met with subject leaders and pupils, met with teaching staff and looked at pupils’ work. Other subjects were also considered as part of this inspection.
p.6
Inspection team
Emma Gregory, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Erica Sharman Her Majesty’s Inspector 17–18 September 2019
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion