Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Cheddington Combined School

Inspected 9 Oct 2019 · URN 110215

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Dylan Davies

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    9 Oct 2019

  • Inspectors verified

    Dylan Davies

  • Postcode verified

    LU7 0RG

  • Name on report verified

    Cheddington Combined School

  • URN verified

    110215

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+10Mostly positivemore positive than 11% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoypositiveeffectiveoutstandingmake good progressstronghappycaring
Criticismconcernsdecliningnot strongseriousinconsistencystrugglenot happybelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1274w+6
  • Safeguarding161w+27

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,427
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 58, typical 55
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 69%Safeguarding 9%About the inspection 22%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Cheddington Combined School High Street, Cheddington, Leighton Buzzard, Bedfordshire LU7 0RG

p.1

Outcome

Cheddington Combined School continues to be a good school. However, inspectors have some concerns that standards may be declining, as set out below.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils feel very safe at this school. They are happy here and get on well together in class, in the playground, and in a wide range of other activities which adults organise for them. Some older pupils enjoy being buddies for the younger children. Younger children like the help they get from their buddies.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils value learning about subjects other than mathematics and English. They enjoy learning how to work well in teams, how to develop their cookery skills, and learning about their local environment. Leaders have made these opportunities a central part of the wider curriculum which pupils benefit from. Many parents like the fact that their children get to do these things as part of the normal school day. Most parents are positive about the school and feel that leaders are caring and approachable.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils behave well. They are respectful of each other. They are polite to adults. Pupils say bullying rarely happens. One pupil spoke for many in saying, ‘It is not nice to say jokes about others. They might not like it.’

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders want the best for every child. However, some subjects are not planned well enough to help this happen, for example in mathematics and science.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Leaders’ work to provide opportunities for more than just academic learning is a strength of the school. This enables pupils to take part in a wide range of sporting, musical and other enrichment activities on a weekly basis. Younger children also benefit from such things as nursery rhyme drama classes, for example. Older pupils also enjoy the educational visits organised for them, such as a recent trip to a local stately home.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are supported well across 8–9 October 2019

p.1

2

the school. Teachers work closely with other adults to support these pupils. As a result, pupils with SEND are helped to develop confidence and independence, as well as building their subject knowledge and skills across the curriculum.

p.2

2

Staff feel that they are supported well by leaders. They feel listened to and part of the decision-making processes that affect their day-to-day work. However, changes in some subject leadership roles and responsibilities in recent years have resulted in inconsistency in the planning and delivery of some subjects. Furthermore, senior leaders have not been able to monitor the quality of education well enough to ensure that the school improves over time. As a result, there have been dips in pupils’ outcomes, some of which are taking too long to address, especially in mathematics and writing by the end of key stage 2.

p.2

2

Children have a good start to learning in the early years. Parents are positive about the information they receive from the school. They regularly join specially planned classes to see how their children learn, including in developing early numeracy skills, for instance. Children make good progress with their phonics (letters and the sounds they make) skills here. This good start means that the very large majority make the expected standard in national phonics screening checks during Year 1.

p.2

2

Some subjects are planned well. In these subjects, teachers plan learning that builds on the things pupils have learned before in a well-considered order. For example, in art and design pupils in Year 4 learn about the collage technique of Matisse before moving on to more skilful and challenging work based on the work of Francis Bacon. As a consequence, Year 4 pupils were able to talk confidently about how their previous work on Matisse helped them create their new piece of art work. However, this level of thought about sequenced learning is not apparent in all subjects. As a result, pupils cannot always make strong connections to their previous learning to help them move on securely.

p.2

2

Despite early phonics provision being sound, some pupils do not have the vocabulary they need to help them learn the topics planned for them, or to write as well as they should as they move through the school. Where this is the case, teachers have to spend additional time supporting pupils to develop their comprehension skills in order to access the learning planned for them. Consequently, time is not used well enough to support new learning, because pupils have not developed their comprehension and writing skills sufficiently and are spending too long catching up. This catch-up also happens as children move from the early years into Year 1, in mathematics for example.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.2

Safeguarding

Leaders have created a culture where the safety and welfare of children is given a high priority. They have strong processes in place to ensure that the information they receive is acted upon quickly. Staff are well trained and know how and when to report any concerns about a child’s welfare that they may have. As such, any concerns are addressed swiftly and appropriately.

p.2

Safeguarding

Governors know and carry out their legal duties regarding safeguarding well. They visit 8–9 October 2019

p.2

3

the school often to check that the systems in place are as they should be.

p.3

3

Leaders work with other agencies in a timely and constructive manner. Consequently, vulnerable pupils and their families receive appropriate support to help them if it is required.

p.3

3

Pupils play safely together at play time. They are well supervised by highly visible staff. Parents are very positive about the welfare of their children and the care and support that staff offer.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Leaders have not adapted the curriculum well enough to address dips in pupils’ achievement over time. Outcomes at the end of key stage 2 are not strong enough in writing and mathematics. Sometimes learning is not planned well enough to build on the knowledge and skills pupils have learned before. In particular, pupils’ comprehension skills are not as strong as they could be. Leaders need to ensure that all subjects are planned logically and sequentially, so that more pupils remember the knowledge and skills they have been taught over time, leading to better outcomes at the end of key stage 2.  Pupils who struggle to read well are starting to catch up because leaders have recognised this is a problem. Leaders’ plans to review how pupils’ reading skills are developed across the school are well founded. This should take place as a matter of urgency. Leaders also need to ensure that additional support that some pupils are

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

given is fully effective, so that their reading skills improve more rapidly.  Over time, leaders have not had enough impact on developing the curriculum. There have been recent changes in the roles and responsibilities of leaders to improve this. However, some subjects’ standards are still declining or not improving rapidly enough, for example writing and mathematics. Senior leaders need to ensure that subject leadership is strengthened further, to provide more impact on improving the quality of education which the school provides.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called a section 8 inspection of a good school or non-exempt outstanding school. We do not give graded judgements on a section 8 inspection. However, if we find some evidence that the school could now be better than good or that standards may be declining, then the next inspection will be a section 5 inspection. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the section 8 inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will convert the section 8 inspection to a section 5 inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the second section 8 inspection since we judged Cheddington Combined School to 8–9 October 2019

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you’re not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 8–9 October 2019

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10111277 Type of school Primary

p.5

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 26 February 2016

p.5

Information about this school

 The school shares the site with Cheddington Pre-School.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 The inspector met with senior leaders, teachers (most of whom are subject leaders) and pupils. He also met with a representative group of teaching and non-teaching staff.  The inspector reviewed safeguarding systems and procedures, including the single central record of checks on adults and child protection and safeguarding policies. He also met with the designated safeguarding lead.  The inspector reviewed the school website, publicly available pupil performance information, and other school documentation.  Seventy-eight responses to Ofsted’s Parent View, 18 staff survey responses and 85 pupil survey responses were considered as part of the inspection. The inspector met with parents at the start of the school day on one day of the inspection.  The inspector met with members of the governing body. He also held telephone conversations with a representative of the local authority and with an independent

p.5

Information about this inspection

education consultant working with the school. 8–9 October 2019

p.5

6

 The inspector observed pupils’ behaviour at lunchtime and as they moved around the school.  Reading, science and art and design were considered in more depth as part of this inspection.

p.6

Inspection team

Dylan Davies, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector 8–9 October 2019

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion