Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)

Kings Oxford

Inspected 17 Oct 2019 · published 7 Nov 2019 · URN 1159262

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    17 Oct 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Pledger, Keith Riley

  • Helped and protected verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    OX4 2UJ

  • Name on report verified

    Kings Oxford

  • URN verified

    1159262

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Helped and protectedGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+68Positivemore positive than 83% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisehigh expectationseffectivestrongconfidentexceptionallyambitiousfeel safeenthusiasm
Criticismconcernsweaknessesunclear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1179w+68
  • What needs to improve52w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,225
shorter than usual (typical 1609)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 43
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 69%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 28%

Full report text

Inspection report for boarding school: Kings Oxford 1 Kings Oxford Touchload Ltd St Joseph’s Hall, Temple Road, Oxford, Oxfordshire OX4 2UJ Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this boarding school

Kings Oxford is part of the Kings Education group, which runs international colleges in the United Kingdom and the United States of America. The aim of the school is to help students prepare for attending universities in the United Kingdom and America. Courses for these students and a small number of GCSE students are provided at the college’s St Joseph’s campus and St Michael’s campus. The college is registered to accept up to 370 students aged from 15 upwards. The students attending the college are from a wide range of countries around the world.

p.1

Information about this boarding school

Students are accommodated in the residential facility (Wavy Gate), with homestay families or through private fostering arrangements. The residential facility is within walking distance of the school or a short bus journey. Another international college, inspected by Ofsted, accommodates students in a separate building on the same site. There is a shared common room and laundry facilities in buildings that are separate from all sleeping accommodation.

p.1

Information about this boarding school

An education inspection took place in February 2019, and the school was judged as good. A separate report is available for this inspection.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

good

How well children and young people are helped and protected good

p.1

good

The effectiveness of leaders and managers good

p.1

good

The boarding school provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

good

Overall judgement at last inspection: good

p.1

good

Date of last inspection: 5 October 2016 Inspection report for boarding school: Kings Oxford 2

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

There is a fully inclusive culture, with students from 20 different countries living in harmony in a peaceful environment. Students are happy. They feel like they are living in a family. They have fun while learning about themselves and others. Boarding fully underpins their learning, and academic success is good, with most students going on to British universities.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Students say they can speak to staff about any concerns. As well as the daily dialogue, there are regular ‘flat meetings’. These are important to the students, as they provide a formal forum in which students can express their concerns and preferences.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Staff arrange areas where students can go for some quiet time if they choose, or for a one-to-one meeting. An independent listener is also available to students. A high- quality, effective and efficient complaints system is also in place that students know how to use. A student said, ‘People pay enough attention to me, so I always feel safe and I’m always sure that there is somebody if I need some help.’ Students’ voice is alive, listened to and responded to.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Staff demonstrate a strong enthusiasm for students to experience British culture and offer a range of activities in the local community and beyond. They support students to be involved in charity work in the local community and overseas. For example, students raised money for the Mexican earthquake relief fund. Some students go to the Kings School in Cambodia to help tutor other students and support the work there.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Catering is of an exceedingly high standard. It is noteworthy that the catering staff meet the dietary needs and requests for students from over 20 different countries without complaint. Staff have a good oversight of student nutrition and well-being. Mealtimes are social occasions when students enjoy each other’s company across the age ranges. A real sense of the school community develops.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Staff plan inductions well. They are clear about who takes responsibility for transfers to and from the airport. Students arrive safely at the school or host family where they are warmly greeted.

p.2

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Staff, with specific responsibilities for safeguarding, work well with other agencies. They share any necessary information and contribute to strategy meetings to agree approaches to keep students as safe as possible. Staff are confident to make dynamic risk assessments, when necessary, in the best interests of each student individually. Inspection report for boarding school: Kings Oxford 3 Staff have plans ready on the arrival of students to show how they will promote students’ physical, mental and emotional well-being during their time in the United Kingdom. The principal has recently introduced pastoral meetings in which key staff identify any students in need of extra support. However, the designated safeguarding lead does not currently take a lead to offer guidance and support to formulate and review welfare plans when required.

p.2

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Staff manage health and safety well. Practice is underpinned by meticulous policies, risk assessments and procedures to address all identified hazards and risks. There is a sincere desire to provide a safe environment for all students, and the standard is guided by ‘what would I want for my own child?’

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Staff expect a high standard of behaviour from students, who, equally, have high expectations of themselves. The ‘ladder of behaviour’ is a useful tool to promote this culture. Students are exceptionally well behaved.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Staff address e-safety well, with education being a strong focus. Staff deliver this in a fun and interactive way that helps students from overseas understand British law. Staff also educate host families in e-safety and ensure that they have appropriate safeguards in place, as recommended at the last inspection.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Senior leaders have made a considerable investment to improve the security of the building by introducing a fob system. There are appropriate safeguards in place for over-18s or visitors accessing the student accommodation, as required at the last inspection.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Staff follow the medication policy that clearly details the way in which they manage medication from overseas in the boarding facility. The policy does not include host families so, on occasion, it is unclear exactly what medication some young people from overseas have bought in and are storing in the host family’s house.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The newly appointed accommodation manager has a good grasp on the overall operation of safely accommodating groups of foreign students. She is sensitive to the needs of students and maternal in approach. This enables students to feel settled and happy, confident that they have a trusted adult they can turn to if necessary. She has identified the issues in relation to retaining suitable residential staff and, working with the principal, is acting to improve this.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The head is a good leader. He is ambitious and confident, eager for professional dialogue and challenge. He has identified the strengths and weaknesses of the school within a short timeframe. He has used the national minimum standards and social care common inspection framework as a framework from which to develop clear Inspection report for boarding school: Kings Oxford 4 plans for future improvement and development. He has effective monitoring systems in place, such as the quarterly senior leaders’ review that evaluates progress against the strategic plan.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Key staff liaise with the host families. They develop a good relationship, and many host families are long serving. Host families are complimentary about the support from the school, the communication and the training that they receive. Equally, key staff develop good relationships with agents and education guardians who are often the link to parents, and especially when parents do not speak English.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Staff like spending time with students. There is a genuine sense of enjoyment of the different personalities and cultures. Staff have high expectations of students who embrace and accept the standards expected of them. Staff understand their roles and receive regular training to ensure that they are competent and knowledgeable. They work as a team. A member of staff said, ‘We are very much a team. We develop practices through shared discussions. We involve students, such as in the interview process and in choosing activities.’ A student said, ‘The staff are absolutely amazing people.’ Line managers give termly supervision to staff and keep written supervision records, as required at the last inspection.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Students in the boarding accommodation live in a university-style facility. The rooms are of good quality and they can personalise them. Some communal areas would benefit from some soft furnishings, a repaint and other finishing touches to make them into a homelier environment. Inspection report for boarding school: Kings Oxford 5

p.4

schools

The school meets the national minimum standards for boarding schools.

p.5

Recommendations

 Utilise the designated safeguarding lead as a source of support, advice and expertise for all staff and especially in the formulation and review of welfare plans.  Expand the medication policy to include the arrangements for host families.  Consider how to improve communal areas to make them a homely environment.

p.5

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’. This inspection was carried out under the Children Act 1989 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the national minimum standards. Inspection report for boarding school: Kings Oxford 6

p.5

Boarding school details

Social care unique reference number: 1159262

p.6

Boarding school details

Headteacher/teacher in charge: John Gale

p.6

Boarding school details

Email address: enquiries@kingseducation.com

p.6

Inspectors

Keith Riley, social care inspector (lead) John Pledger, social care inspector Inspection report for boarding school: Kings Oxford 7 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspectors

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspectors

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspectors

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted No.

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion