Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)

Marathon Science School

Inspected 15 Oct 2019 · published 6 Nov 2019 · URN SC400622

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    15 Oct 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Barnaby Dowell

  • Helped and protected verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    SE8 5RQ

  • Name on report verified

    Marathon Science School

  • URN verified

    SC400622

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Helped and protectedGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+39Positivemore positive than 43% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositiveeffectivestrongimprovedambitioushappyenjoyconsistently
Criticismconcernsrequires improvementconcernvariable

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings800w+45
  • What needs to improve67w−43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
863
shorter than usual (typical 1609)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 50, typical 43
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Inspection report for boarding school: Marathon Science School 1 Marathon Science School Severn Hills Trust 1-9 Evelyn Street, Surrey Quays, London SE8 5RQ Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this boarding school

Marathon Science School is an independent secondary boarding school with an Islamic ethos. It is registered for boys aged 10 to 19 years. The school is located near Surrey Quays and the boarding provision is in Hackney. Most of the pupils are of Turkish background and speak English as an additional language. Boarders also come from Belgium, Sweden, Holland and Germany. All of the 50 pupils are boarders. The boarding provision was subject to a monitoring inspection on 2 April 2019. The boarding provision was found to have addressed all of the concerns found at the inspection which occurred on 10 and 11 July 2018.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

Good

How well children and young people are helped and protected Good

p.1

Good

The effectiveness of leaders and managers Good

p.1

Good

The boarding school provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

Good

Overall judgement at last inspection: requires improvement

p.1

Good

Date of last inspection: 10 and 11 July 2018 Inspection report for boarding school: Marathon Science School 2

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Boarders value and are happy with the recent changes in the boarding provision. Boarders point to improvements to their living environment, for example new curtains in their bedrooms and a refurbished activity room. One boarder said, ‘There is now much more to do here, it is fun being with your friends all of the time.’ Boarders enjoy an improved range of activities, including football, swimming and recent trips to Istanbul and Holland. Outcomes for boarders are positive. At the end of the last academic year, each boarder leaving the school moved on to a planned programme of further education. Boarders value the positive impact of structured routines on their school work. Boarding staff communicate regularly with day school colleagues and follow pupils’ progress. Boarding staff support boarders with their homework and address any concerns passed on from the day school. Behaviour management is effective. Boarders adhere to simple and consistently

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

enforced expectations. Boarders recognise that the rules support their focus on academic studies, for example by limiting their use of mobile phones. Parents comment on the improvement in academic performance and also on their child’s demeanour and presentation. One parent commented, ‘I have noticed how much more positive he is since he started in boarding.’ Boarders are involved in the running of their boarding house. Following a request from boarders, staff arranged a visit from a local academic to discuss a topic on the history syllabus. The independent visitor is a consistent presence in the school. They visit the school regularly and are trusted by the boarders.

p.2

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Boarders feel a sense of community within boarding and there are no reports of bullying. Boarding year groups are small, and this helps to promote close and positive relationships. Boarders learn a range of new skills for independence. For many, this is their first experience of living away from home and staff work hard to offer a supportive induction. Staff encourage boarders to learn basic tasks such as managing their personal hygiene and their daily schedule. Boarders come from a rich variety of cultures and backgrounds. This enables them to learn from each other and to develop new social skills such as the tolerance of difference. Boarders learn to keep themselves safe. Local police recently visited the boarding Inspection report for boarding school: Marathon Science School 3 house to remind boarders of the importance of limiting mobile phone use in public and of remaining alert when out in the community.

p.2

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Safeguarding in the boarding provision is good. Staff talk with passion and concern about the potential dangers to boarders when out in the community such as the risks posed by child criminal exploitation. Staff inform key agencies when concerns arise. Recently, staff liaised with a local authority for a boarder who had left school and was due to be home educated.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Management of the boarding provision is stable and consistent. The head of boarding has been in post since 2017 and has worked at the school in various positions for 11 years. He is undertaking his management qualification and aims to complete this by November 2019. The head of boarding is proud of the progress made since the last inspection. The staff team is focused on supporting boarders to become ‘rounded individuals’, both in terms of their academic and social skills. Staff are ambitious and eager to improve the boarding experience, for example they are presently seeking a wrestling coach to instruct boarders. Recording practice in boarding is variable. Managers do not regularly record sanctions, complaints, or staff supervision. This limits their evaluation of boarders’ behaviour, staff performance and any concerns expressed about the boarding provision.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Staff morale is more positive, and retention levels have improved. There have been no staff departures since July 2017. The resulting stability has offered more consistency to boarders and allowed a strong team dynamic to develop. Staff report strong levels of management support and performance appraisal. However, at present appraisals do not reflect the views of boarders or other staff members, thus limiting their effectiveness. Admissions processes are effective. The head of boarding visits boarders at home prior to admission. This helps staff to understand boarders’ individual home circumstances and how better to support them. Inspection report for boarding school: Marathon Science School 4

p.3

Recommendations

 Ensure that all supervision sessions with boarding staff are appropriately recorded.  Performance appraisals should consider using feedback from boarders and other professionals to offer a more comprehensive assessment of performance.  Ensure that a record is kept of all complaints, allowing the more efficient tracking of concerns.  Ensure that a record is kept of all sanctions given to boarders, allowing the monitoring of behaviours.

p.4

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’. This inspection was carried out under the Children Act 1989 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the national minimum standards. Inspection report for boarding school: Marathon Science School 5

p.4

Boarding school details

Social care unique reference number: SC400622

p.5

Boarding school details

Headteacher/teacher in charge: Uzeyir Onur

p.5

Boarding school details

Email address: uzeyironur@marathonschool.com

p.5

Inspector

Barnaby Dowell, social care inspector (lead) Inspection report for boarding school: Marathon Science School 6 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.5

Inspector

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

Inspector

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

Inspector

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion