Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Parkside Middle School
Summary
Bianka Zemke (lead), Lois Kelly, Russell Hinton
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
12 Sept 2019
- Inspectors verified
Bianka Zemke, Lois Kelly, Russell Hinton
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Outstanding
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
B61 0AH
- Name on report verified
Parkside Middle School
- URN verified
116959
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentOutstanding
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Relationships between pupils and adults are excellent. p.1
- All pupils have access to a well-developed and highly effective careers programme. p.2
- Leaders support pupils’ personal development exceptionally well. p.2
- Pupils enjoy and speak with enthusiasm about the many opportunities for learning beyond lessons. p.1
- Pupils told us that they discuss issues that affect their well-being and safety during ‘Thrive’ lessons. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders have thought about what pupils should learn in each subject, term-by-term, if they are to achieve these high aims. p.2
- This helps teachers to be sure that pupils know what they need to before they can tackle more challenging work. p.2
- Plans in French set out what pupils should learn but lessons do not follow in a logical order. p.2
- Leaders should ensure that teachers check pupils’ progression of skills, p.3
- Leaders need to ensure that the content of all subject plans is well chosen, carefully sequenced and delivered as intended. p.3
- Leaders also need to make sure that subject leaders in these subject areas are skilled enough to do this and that teachers have the necessary subject knowledge. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment13
“Teachers know what to do if they have any concerns about a pupil.” p.3Leadership & governance9
“Leaders support pupils’ personal development exceptionally well.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,040
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Plain English
- Flesch 63, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Parkside Middle School Stourbridge Road, Bromsgrove, Worcestershire B61 0AH
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Outstanding Leadership and management Good Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are very happy at Parkside Middle School. They enjoy learning and coming to school. Relationships between pupils and adults are excellent. We saw good- mannered, friendly and respectful interactions between teachers and pupils in class and during social times. Every single member of staff works hard to make sure pupils do as well as they can.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils’ behaviour is good. They usually work hard and aim to do well. Lessons are calm and orderly. Pupils told us that they feel safe and learn about many topics, such as online safety. This helps them to stay safe outside of school. Pupils do not worry about being bullied. They said if it happens, staff take it very seriously and deal with it quickly.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils’ personal development and well-being are at the heart of the school. All staff at the school care about pupils’ welfare. Pupils enjoy and speak with enthusiasm about the many opportunities for learning beyond lessons. They gave various examples of clubs and visits that they have taken part in, such as the trip to Worcestershire Parkway. Pupils are keen to learn from and value one another. They are proud of their school and commonly refer to it as the ‘Parkside family’.
p.1
better?
The quality of education at the school is good and still developing. Leaders’ ambition is for all pupils, including disadvantaged pupils and pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), to achieve as well as possible. They are unapologetic about their aspirations for every pupil in their school. Leaders have thought about what pupils should learn in each subject, term-by-term, if they are to achieve these high aims.
p.2
better?
Leaders support pupils’ personal development exceptionally well. This is underpinned by regular trips, visits and excursions. Pupils enjoy these and speak highly of them. Pupils have regular debates about current affairs in personal, social and health education and form times. Pupils told us that they discuss issues that affect their well-being and safety during ‘Thrive’ lessons. Pupils enjoy those lessons. They talk with confidence about how they can maintain good mental health and a healthy lifestyle and avoid dangers on social media platforms.
p.2
better?
The plans for most subjects make clear to teachers exactly what to teach pupils and in what order. This helps teachers to be sure that pupils know what they need to before they can tackle more challenging work. In some subjects, this works really well. Teachers focus on developing skills that the pupils can use in other subjects. For example, pupils use their literacy knowledge, gained in English lessons, across a wide range of subjects to write extensively about their topics.
p.2
better?
Plans in French set out what pupils should learn but lessons do not follow in a logical order. Pupils do not gain enough basic knowledge to help them understand later topics. For example, Year 5 pupils start French with lessons about ‘French history’, ‘food and drink’ and then ‘self and family’. The order of topics is random. Pupils struggle with this because they have not remembered the vocabulary from previous lessons. They do not know these words because they have not been taught them at all or well enough in the past.
p.2
better?
In subjects with stronger plans, teachers adapt the plans so that all pupils gain good knowledge and understanding. All pupils achieve well in these subjects. Where the subject plans are less detailed, teachers find it hard to know what changes to make for SEND pupils. SEND pupils do not do as well in these subjects as they could.
p.2
better?
Leaders want pupils to understand why they learn what they do. All pupils have access to a well-developed and highly effective careers programme. Teachers aim to link lessons across the curriculum to possible careers. Pupils are well prepared for their next steps in education and beyond.
p.2
3
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
3
Leaders ensure that new staff are suitable to work in their school. Staff are well trained to spot signs that a pupil may be at risk of harm. Teachers know what to do if they have any concerns about a pupil. Teachers report concerns, however minor, to the specially trained safeguarding team. Staff know their pupils well and use this information to ensure pupils are safe.
p.3
3
Leaders keep oversight of pupils they know to be vulnerable. They work well with external agencies, such as social services, to make sure that these pupils receive the support they need.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The effective implementation of the curriculum seen in many subjects is not matched in all areas of the curriculum. The content of some subjects is not chosen and sequenced well. This is particularly so in French. Here, the plans do not support teachers to build on pupils’ prior knowledge. As a result, pupils’ understanding is insecure. Leaders need to ensure that the content of all subject plans is well chosen, carefully sequenced and delivered as intended. Leaders also need to make sure that subject leaders in these subject areas are skilled enough to do this and that teachers have the necessary subject knowledge. Teachers use tests to check pupils’ knowledge after a series of lessons in some subjects, such as French and geography. However, they do not check if pupils are building on prior learning or are able to do more, know more and remember more over time. Leaders should ensure that teachers check pupils’ progression of skills,
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
knowledge and understanding as they move through the school so that they become increasingly knowledgeable and skilful in these subjects.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
If you’re not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .
p.3
4
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
4
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 11–12 September 2019
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10088409 Type of school Middle deemed secondary
p.5
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Website http://www.edulink.networcs.net/
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 11 July 2018
p.5
Information about this school
The school is smaller than the average-sized secondary school. The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is average. The proportion of pupils with SEND is well above average. This includes provision in a resource base for pupils with autism spectrum disorder and speech, language and communication needs. The school makes no alternative provision for any of its pupils. A small number of pupils attend part-time sessions at the on-site SEND resource base.
p.5
Information about this inspection
We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher, deputy headteachers and assistant headteachers, subject and middle leaders, teachers, pupils, governors and an external support partner. They scrutinised school documents, including curriculum plans and school development plans. Inspectors scrutinised the school’s safeguarding arrangements and documentation, including the single central record. 11–12 September 2019
p.5
6
Inspectors completed various inspection activities to gather evidence on the quality of education. These included lesson visits and discussions with subject leaders, teachers and pupils about their learning. Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour during lessons and at break and lunch times. They visited an assembly and numerous form-time sessions. Inspectors spoke to many pupils during the two days of the inspection. The inspection focused on English, mathematics, French and geography. All other subjects were considered as part of the inspection.
p.6
Inspection team
Bianka Zemke, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Russell Hinton Ofsted Inspector 11–12 September 2019
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion