Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust

Inspected 20 Sept 2019 · published 25 Oct 2019 · URN 1278629

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Jane Hughes (lead), Gail Shenton, Saskia Niderost

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    20 Sept 2019

  • Inspectors verified

    Gail Shenton, Jane Hughes, Saskia Niderost

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Name on report verified

    Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust

  • URN verified

    1278629

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+59Positivemore positive than 93% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveenjoyeffectivelyhigh expectationsthrivewell-plannedambitioushigh-quality
Criticismtoo manytoo oftendo not knowgapsnot clearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspectionSafeguarding positive critical
  • Findings710w+61
  • Safeguarding97w+58
  • What needs to improve120w−33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
895
shorter than usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 37, typical 56
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 53%Safeguarding 7%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Inspection of Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Apprenticeships Requires improvement Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.1

Information about this provider

Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (CNWL) provides healthcare services for people with a range of physical and healthcare needs. It provides services at around 150 sites across north and central London and surrounding areas. Since September 2017, the organisation has been delivering levy-funded apprenticeships to its own employees. At the time of the inspection, 38 apprentices were on a level 3 team leading standards-based apprenticeship.

p.1

Information about this provider

In November 2018, CNWL received an insufficient progress judgement in one of the themes at its new provider monitoring visit. As a result, it has not enrolled any new apprentices this year. 18–20 September 2019

p.1

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Apprentices enjoy their programmes. They particularly appreciate the taught sessions reflecting on their work and the one-to-one support they receive from assessors. Tutors help apprentices develop their confidence to be effective team leaders. Apprentices improve their professional standards and model effectively the behaviours expected within CNWL.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Nurses, support workers and health visitors on apprenticeships develop the knowledge, skills and behaviours that help them gain promotion and extra responsibility at work. For example, they use coaching techniques successfully when completing one-to-one reviews with their team and are more confident in delegating tasks. Apprentices receive good support from staff to prepare them for their next steps. All apprentices who have completed their course gained a distinction in their endpoint assessment.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Apprentices do not benefit enough from a well-planned curriculum that links their theory sessions with workplace practice and assessment. Staff have not sequenced the curriculum logically to consolidate theoretical knowledge. As a result, apprentices do not develop their knowledge and skills as much as they could and too many have not achieved their programme within the planned time.

p.2

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Apprentices enjoy a safe and secure working and training environment. They have access to a wide range of safeguarding and well-being support within the trust. They feel safe and have good knowledge of how to keep themselves and their service users safe.

p.2

better?

Tutors and assessors do not use their subject expertise and experience well enough to sequence the content of the apprenticeship standard. Too often, the assessment of apprentices’ workplace practice is not planned adequately to test their knowledge of the theory taught. Tutors do not receive sufficient information through assessment of projects and assignments, which are marked by the assessors, on what apprentices do and do not know. As a result, a minority of apprentices do not consolidate what they have learned and too many do not meet their milestone targets.

p.2

better?

Leaders, managers and assessors have high expectations of apprentices to do well and thrive within the CNWL trust and NHS. They have implemented an ambitious and challenging team leading programme, which they have adapted to meet the trust’s vision to upskill and improve middle managers’ effectiveness. For example, they have mapped elements of the NHS Improvement and Leadership Academy programme to the apprenticeship standard. The rationale for the programme is clear.

p.2

better?

Since the previous monitoring visit, leaders and managers have taken positive steps 18–20 September 2019

p.2

3

to make improvements to the governance arrangements and the provision for English and mathematics qualifications. The apprenticeship steering group has improved the level of scrutiny and support given to managers. Managers have put in place appropriate arrangements to support apprentices to develop their long-term understanding of English and mathematics and gain qualifications. However, the full impact of these arrangements cannot yet be seen in the quality of education and outcomes for apprentices.

p.3

3

Staff do not check in sufficient detail the prior knowledge, skills and behaviours apprentices have at the start of, and throughout, their programme. They rely too much on apprentices self-assessing their own knowledge. They do not identify clearly, for those apprentices who have prior experience which is relevant to their apprenticeship, the specific knowledge and skills that apprentices need to develop.

p.3

3

Apprentices produce high-quality work in demanding projects and assignments. For example, apprentices work on projects to devise systems to improve acute rehabilitation admissions, and protocols for out-of-hours admissions. Tutors and assessors give apprentices useful feedback on their work. This helps them gain high marks and use the correct technical language in their assignments and in their workplace.

p.3

3

Leaders provide an effective careers programme that helps apprentices prepare for their next steps. Apprentices have a good understanding of the options available to them once they have completed their programme. Staff support apprentices in applying for promotion, and many have been successful.

p.3

3

Staff use a range of resources and activities effectively that ensure apprentices develop resilience in the face of difficult and complex situations at work and in their personal lives. For example, apprentices access online courses, an employee assistance programme and work-shadowing opportunities.

p.3

3

Leaders have not developed the curriculum sufficiently to promote fundamental British values. They do not help apprentices deepen their understanding of how British values complement the values held within the trust.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders and managers pay good attention to safeguarding the trust’s staff, including apprentices. They have appropriate policies and procedures in place to deal with safeguarding referrals and issues. There is a team of very experienced designated safeguarding leads who have developed strong links with the local authorities, safeguarding boards and ‘Prevent’ duty coordinators.

p.3

Safeguarding

All staff and apprentices complete appropriate training in safeguarding and in the dangers associated with radicalisation and extremism, and online. Apprentices have access to specialist support staff, as well as the designated safeguarding lead, to 18–20 September 2019

p.3

What does the provider need to do to improve?

 Improve the quality of education by ensuring tutors and assessors work closely to sequence the content of the curriculum logically and use resources and activities that help apprentices to develop their understanding.  Staff need to improve how they assess apprentices’ prior knowledge, skills and behaviours at the start of, and throughout, the apprenticeship programme, to identify any gaps in apprentices’ theoretical knowledge and understanding.  Leaders need to ensure that the curriculum enables tutors and assessors to develop and deepen apprentices’ knowledge of fundamental British values. 18–20 September 2019

p.4

Provider details

Address 350 Euston Road Regent’s Place London NW1 3AX

p.5

Provider details

Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.5

Provider details

Main subcontractors n/a 18–20 September 2019

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspection team was assisted by the head of education as nominee. Inspectors took account of the provider’s most recent self-assessment report and development plans, and the previous new provider monitoring visit report. The inspection was carried out using the further education and skills inspection handbook and took into account all relevant provision at the provider. Inspectors collected a wide range of evidence to inform judgements, including scrutinising learners’ work, seeking the views of learners, staff and other stakeholders, and examining the provider’s documentation and records.

p.6

Inspection team

Jane Hughes, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Gail Shenton Ofsted Inspector Saskia Niderost Ofsted Inspector 18–20 September 2019

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion