Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

RM Training (UK) Limited

Inspected 2 Oct 2019 · published 24 Oct 2019 · URN 2494982

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Christine Sherwin

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    2 Oct 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Christine Sherwin

  • Postcode verified

    SS1 1AT

  • Name on report verified

    RM Training (UK) Limited

  • URN verified

    2494982

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−33Criticalmore positive than 10% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Criticismlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
15
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
8 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 1%About the inspection 99%

Full report text

RM Training (UK) Limited Monitoring visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Christine Sherwin, Ofsted Inspector

p.1

Address:

7 Weston Chambers Weston Road Southend-On-Sea SS1 1AT Monitoring visit: RM Training (UK) Limited, 1–2 October 2019

p.1

Context and focus of visit

From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by ESFA and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the Further education and skills inspection handbook, especially the sections entitled ‘Providers newly directly funded to deliver apprenticeship training provision’ and ‘Monitoring visits’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

RM Training (UK) Limited (RMT) was established in 2008. RMT secured direct funding to provide apprenticeships in 2017. At the time of the monitoring visit, 14 apprentices were enrolled on standards apprenticeship programmes with RMT, and eight were enrolled on framework apprenticeships. Their programmes were in youth work, business administration, warehousing, team leading and recruitment, with 11 apprentices enrolled at each of levels 2 and 3.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders plan their apprenticeship programmes carefully with employers to meet the apprenticeship requirements. They ensure that employers provide apprentices with sufficient off-the-job training time and appropriate support and supervision. They recruit apprentices who can gain substantial new knowledge, skills and behaviours through their apprenticeship.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders plan apprenticeship delivery to meet the specific business needs of employers. For example, leaders prioritise the early development of the skills that are most important in enabling apprentices to contribute to their employers’ businesses. Trainers are knowledgeable, skilled and experienced, and they are appropriately qualified. Leaders provide them with good development opportunities. Leaders also provide an appropriate range of useful resources for apprentices, both electronically and on hard copy. Apprentices are right to value this flexibility. Leaders monitor the progress of apprentices frequently. They take effective action when apprentices fall behind. As a result, most apprentices achieve their apprenticeship. All apprentices who have completed so far have done so by their planned end date. Leaders do not ensure that they plan apprenticeship delivery effectively, to meet the needs and abilities of individual apprentices. For example, they do not use the

p.2

Reasonable progress

Monitoring visit: RM Training (UK) Limited, 1–2 October 2019 detailed information about apprentices’ starting points to ensure that apprentices receive appropriate challenge and support from the start of their programme. As a result, not all apprentices make progress in developing new knowledge, skills and behaviours rapidly. For example, apprentices who have English as a second language make slow progress initially, until they receive support to develop their English skills. Leaders do not evaluate the quality of education effectively on their apprenticeship programmes. They do not evaluate whether all apprentices are achieving high standards or whether they are making rapid progress.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Apprentices are motivated and value their training. They improve their confidence and gain new knowledge, skills and behaviours. For example, supply chain apprentices understand their workplace processes and practices. They learn to carry out all the tasks in the warehouse. Consequently, they become more productive employees. Apprentices are on the most appropriate courses. Most apprentices’ written assignments are of an appropriate standard, and they make expected progress towards completion. Trainers successfully support apprentices to stay on their courses. Their frequent visits help and encourage apprentices to balance personal commitments, work demands, and the time required for study. Employers support apprentices to study at work, allowing them time to acquire new skills and reflect on their learning. Trainers provide apprentices with useful developmental feedback on their written work. This includes feedback on apprentices’ use of English, for example, in relation to

p.3

Reasonable progress

punctuation. Most apprentices use the feedback appropriately to improve the standard of English in their written work. Trainers do not use information about apprentices’ existing knowledge, skills and behaviour to plan and deliver a curriculum that challenges the most experienced and skilled apprentices. They set apprentices the same learning tasks regardless of their experiences. Trainers review most apprentices’ progress frequently. During reviews, they monitor and expand apprentices’ understanding of British values, safeguarding, and the dangers of radicalisation and extremism. Trainers do not review with sufficient rigour how well apprentices’ knowledge, skills and behaviours are developing. Monitoring visit: RM Training (UK) Limited, 1–2 October 2019

p.3

Reasonable progress

Leaders give the protection of apprentices and staff a very high priority. The designated safeguarding lead and other leaders are well qualified in safeguarding to level 4. Safeguarding and safe recruitment policies and procedures are comprehensive and appropriate. All staff are fully trained in safeguarding and the ‘Prevent’ duty. They have regular updates on current local risks relating to radicalisation and extremism and safeguarding. They have a sound understanding of their responsibilities for keeping learners and themselves safe. Leaders ensure that each apprentice works in a safe and welcoming environment before they start their apprenticeship. Trainers explain to apprentices at their induction how to keep themselves safe at work and in their personal lives. They frequently extend and reinforce apprentices’ knowledge and understanding of these issues, including the dangers associated with radicalisation and extremism.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Consequently, apprentices have a good understanding of relevant dangers and how to deal with them. Monitoring visit: RM Training (UK) Limited, 1–2 October 2019 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Reasonable progress

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Reasonable progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion