Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Phoenix Academy

Inspected 3 Oct 2019 · published 24 Oct 2019 · URN 145016

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    3 Oct 2019

  • Inspectors verified

    Lynda Welham

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Outstanding

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    BN27 2PH

  • Name on report verified

    Phoenix Academy

  • URN verified

    145016

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementOutstanding
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+47Positivemore positive than 29% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongenjoyhigh expectationsimprovinghappyeffectiveclearhigh-quality
Criticismconcernsnot strongpoorlacknot yetpersistent absencenot well preparednot happy

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1102w+47
  • Safeguarding104w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,172
about usual (typical 1098)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 59, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
5
typical 4
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%Safeguarding 6%About the inspection 26%

Full report text

Inspection of Phoenix Academy Marshfoot Lane, Hailsham, East Sussex BN27 2PH

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Outstanding Early years provision Good Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Not previously inspected 2–3 October 2019

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

This is a rapidly improving school. Pupils, parents and carers who talked to inspectors were very clear that the school is much better than it was in the past. Pupils enjoy learning about new things. They appreciate the help they receive from staff when they are ‘stuck’ or are finding things difficult.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Older pupils in particular are positive about the changes that they have seen in the past two years. They feel safe in school and free from bullying, although readily admit that they sometimes fall out with each other. They said that teachers have high expectations of both their behaviour and their engagement in learning. Inspectors’ visits to classrooms, scrutiny of pupils’ work and observing pupils at breaktime and lunchtime proved this to be the case.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are proud of their school. They were happy to share their learning with inspectors. They enjoy their trips outside school, especially to local historical sites such as Newhaven Fort. When asked, some pupils thought that they would like more after-school clubs or better board games when they have wet breaktimes. However, others said they were very happy at school, and that they could not think of anything that needed to be better.

p.2

better?

Leaders and those in positions of governance have high aspirations for every pupil. They are determined that the school will shake off the legacy of the past so that current pupils fulfil their full potential. Leaders’ vision for providing a high-quality education is becoming a reality. Discussions with pupils showed that they have a growing pride in their school. They enjoy coming to school, although some pupils still do not attend as regularly as they should.

p.2

better?

The curriculum is designed well but is still evolving. Leaders are not afraid to make difficult decisions. They have set clear priorities for improvement, especially where the curriculum is concerned. This has meant that some subjects have not developed as quickly as others since the school joined the STEP Academy Trust in 2017. For instance, provision for the arts and for foreign languages is not yet as strong as leaders intend. However, the quality of teaching and learning in reading, writing and mathematics, as well as some other subjects, is now strong. Key texts provide staff with a starting point for teaching. These are sequenced well, enabling pupils to build on previous learning as they move through the school. As a result, pupils are enjoying success in classrooms and their behaviour is much better.

p.2

better?

Leaders ensure that staff benefit from a wide range of effective personal development. Improving teachers’ subject knowledge and ensuring that all staff have high expectations of pupils have been key to the growing success of the school. Strong links to local schools within the multi-academy trust provide staff with extra advantages, not least sharing good practice. 2–3 October 2019

p.2

3

In the past, pupils have not been well prepared for their move to secondary school. Their achievements in reading, writing and mathematics have not compared well to other primary schools. This picture is improving rapidly, including for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) and those from disadvantaged backgrounds. For instance, younger pupils learn to read quickly because staff are trained well and know this is key to pupils’ future success. Older pupils enjoy reading. Most talk with clarity about the books that they have read. Year 5 pupils happily shared their views about the new text they are reading together, confident to make comparisons with books they had read previously as a class.

p.3

3

The wider curriculum is also an emerging strength. Pupils’ personal development is served well. Pastoral care is strong here. Pupils are supported successfully by staff when they find learning hard. The use of a carefully adapted scheme of personal, social and health education (PSHE) also helps pupils understand the impact of prejudice and lack of tolerance, for instance. Well-chosen texts help them to understand about different cultures and how other peoples’ lives are different from their own.

p.3

3

Children get off to a good start in the early years. Routines are well established, despite children being very new to the school. Staff know children well. Their assessments are thorough and have already enabled key priorities to be identified for individuals and this year’s cohort as whole. Children are already enjoying phonics (letters and the sounds they represent) lessons. Other areas of learning are provided for well, including developing children’s understanding of the world around them through role play and discovery.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

All staff know that it is their collective responsibility to keep pupils safe. The culture to keep pupils safe is strong, because the highest priority is given to their welfare, health and safety.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders have ensured that systems and procedures to keep pupils safe are fit for purpose. Staff training is up to date. Staff know what to do if they have concerns.

p.3

Safeguarding

Those who have additional responsibilities are experienced and diligent in their work. Although relationships with outside agencies are strong, leaders are not afraid to challenge decisions when they have concerns about the safeguarding of pupils.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Leaders have a clear rationale for the curriculum. They have prioritised what subjects should be taught and when. Most subjects are now covered well across the school. This is particularly the case in reading, writing and mathematics. This 2–3 October 2019

p.3

4

is equally true of science and some foundation subjects, including history and geography. However, some subjects are less well developed. This includes languages, which is not currently taught. Leaders’ plans to widen the curriculum should be implemented without delay.  Despite the quality of teaching being much better than it was in the past, pupils’ outcomes at the end of key stage 2 are not as strong as they could be. Attainment in reading, writing and mathematics still lags behind that of most other primary schools. Leaders know that pupils need to make even better progress if the legacy of poor teaching and learning from the past is to be overcome.  Despite leaders’ efforts, overall attendance is not as good as it could be. Rates of persistent absence are too high. Leaders should redouble their efforts to reduce absence, so that all pupils can benefit from the good and improving quality of education the school now provides.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

If you’re not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 2–3 October 2019

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10111106 Type of school Primary

p.5

School details

Headteacher Tim Mills (executive headteacher) Alun Evans (headteacher)

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.5

Information about this school

 This was the first inspection of the school since it became part of the STEP Academy Trust in January 2017. The previous school had been part of the Lilac Sky Schools Academy Trust.

p.5

Information about this inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors held a wide range of meetings during the inspection. These included meetings with leaders, teaching and support staff, pupils and parents. The lead inspector met with representatives of the multi-academy trust, as well as the chair of the local academy committee. He also talked to a member of the trust board on the telephone.  When considering the quality of the curriculum, inspectors focused on reading, mathematics, history and science. This included visiting lessons, looking at pupils’ work, and talking to leaders, teachers and pupils about how teaching in these subjects builds on pupils’ knowledge over time.  Throughout the inspection, inspectors assessed the school’s culture to keep pupils 2–3 October 2019

p.5

6

safe. A wide range of documentation was considered, including policies and staff training records. The single central record of checks on the suitability of adults to work with children was also scrutinised.

p.6

Inspection team

Clive Close, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Lynda Welham Ofsted Inspector 2–3 October 2019

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion