Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

North Leamington School

Inspected 25 Sept 2019 · published 22 Oct 2019 · URN 142202

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Bianka Zemke (lead), Chris Stevens, Mike Onyon

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    25 Sept 2019

  • Inspectors verified

    Bianka Zemke, Chris Stevens, Mike Onyon

  • Postcode verified

    CV32 6RD

  • Name on report verified

    North Leamington School

  • URN verified

    142202

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+42Positivemore positive than 38% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoypositiveenthusiasmoutstandingambitiousstrongwell plannedhappy
Criticismconcernsseriousdecliningstrugglenot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1013w+50
  • Safeguarding103w−11

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,114
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Plain English
Flesch 64, typical 55
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 65%Safeguarding 7%About the inspection 29%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: North Leamington School Sandy Lane, Blackdown, Leamington Spa, Warwickshire CV32 6RD

p.1

Outcome

North Leamington School continues to be a good school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are happy at this school. Interactions between staff and pupils are friendly, courteous and polite. Behaviour is good in lessons and at break and lunchtimes. Pupils are kind to one another and support each other with their work. Lessons are generally free from disruptions. Older pupils act as positive role models to their younger peers.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils told us that bullying is not tolerated at school. Staff quickly deal with any that occurs. Pupils say that they enjoy school and are safe here. Parents and teachers say the same. Leaders ensure that vulnerable pupils get support in the school’s nurture area. Here, they can take time out and get support from Lulu the school dog. Pupils told us how Lulu has helped them with their mental health.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils speak with pride and enthusiasm about their learning. They enjoy the many opportunities for learning beyond the classroom. They gave various examples of clubs and visits that they have taken part in such as the Breen Sands trip.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Leaders have a clear vision and rationale for the curriculum at the school. It is ambitious for all pupils, including pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) and disadvantaged pupils. Pupils are supported to achieve aspirational targets and frequently do so. Leaders and subject leaders have planned what pupils should learn term by term in each subject. These plans make clear to teachers exactly what to teach pupils and in what order. Teachers know what pupils should learn before they move on. In most subjects this works well, such as in geography, English and science. For example, pupils in geography spoke about their field trip and how that learning links to their current topic. Teachers adapt these plans so that pupils with SEND can access the learning.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Plans in food technology are not as well organised. Here, plans do not follow in a logical order, but they do set out what pupils should learn. Pupils do not gain enough basic knowledge to help them understand later topics. For example, Year 11 pupils were not 24–25 September 2019

p.1

2

able to explain why rising agents are important in some foods. They struggle with this because they have not remembered what rising agents are used for.

p.2

2

Students in the sixth form enjoy their studies. Subject plans build on prior knowledge and deepen it further. Teachers have strong subject knowledge and share their enthusiasm with students. Students achieve well. They enjoy many trips to universities, colleges and visits from apprenticeship providers. They contribute well to school and the wider community, for instance, through volunteering. Students are well prepared for their next stages in life. Almost all of them move on to positive destinations.

p.2

2

This year, pupils in Year 10 will sit their English Literature GCSE examination early. Leaders have adapted the English plans so that pupils continue to read full texts in a shorter space of time. They have plans in place to check if pupils will learn all they need to be successful.

p.2

2

Leaders support pupils’ personal development well. The personal, social and health education (PSHE) curriculum is well planned and delivered in religious education (RE) lessons and in tutor time. Leaders need to check that the delivery of the RE subject content is not negatively affected by the quantity of PSHE work during these lessons. Pupils told us that they discuss issues in more depth during focus days. They said that they would like more input on life skills, such as finances and how to stay debt-free. Leaders have acted on this. The plans for this academic year include personal finance lessons.

p.2

2

Leaders consider staff workload and well-being. For example, they have restructured assessments. Teachers told us that they have had a say in when and how often they check pupils’ learning. Staff feel well supported by leaders.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.2

Safeguarding

Staff receive the training they need to spot any signs that a child may need help. All staff know who to refer any issues on to. They know about potential risks that exist within their local and regional community. Leaders refer any concerns on and the safeguarding team deal with them quickly.

p.2

Safeguarding

Leaders work well with outside agencies. Staff refer concerns on and seek help and advice to ensure that pupils are safe. Safeguarding staff give extra help to families when they need it. Leaders complete the required employment checks and keep accurate records. 24–25 September 2019

p.2

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Not all subject plans within the curriculum are sequenced to follow a logical order. As a result, not all plans are effective in ensuring that pupils learn what they need to over time. Leaders should make sure that plans in each subject set out what order learning is sequenced to ensure that pupils can achieve.  A great proportion of the plans for pupils’ personal development is currently delivered in RE lessons. Leaders need to assure themselves that pupils have enough time in RE lessons to learn about different faiths and beliefs as well as the other topics that have been included in these lessons.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called a section 8 inspection of a good school or non-exempt outstanding school. We do not give graded judgements on a section 8 inspection. However, if we find some evidence that the school could now be better than good or that standards may be declining, then the next inspection will be a section 5 inspection. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the section 8 inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will convert the section 8 inspection to a section 5 inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the first section 8 inspection since we judged the predecessor school, North Leamington School, to be good in February 2014.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.3

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 24–25 September 2019

p.3

School details

Inspection number 10111707 Type of school Secondary

p.4

provision

Number of pupils on the school roll 1,466

p.4

form

Website http://www.northleamingtonschool.warwick shire.sch.uk Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected as an academy

p.4

Information about this school

 North Leamington School converted to become an academy on 1 November 2016. When its predecessor school, North Leamington School, was last inspected by Ofsted, it was judged to be good overall.  The school uses one alternative provider, Leamington LAMP, for part-time alternative provision.

p.4

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher, deputy headteachers and assistant headteachers, subject and middle leaders, teachers, pupils, and governors, including a telephone conversation with the chair of the governing body. They scrutinised school documents, including curriculum plans and school development plans.  Inspectors scrutinised the school’s safeguarding arrangements and documentation, 24–25 September 2019

p.4

5

including the single central record. They met with the designated safeguarding lead and special educational needs coordinator. Inspectors spoke with teaching, kitchen, caretaking and cleaning staff about safeguarding.  Inspectors visited the school’s nurture area and visited the school’s internal isolation room.  Inspectors completed various inspection activities to gather evidence on the quality of education. These included lesson visits, looking at pupils’ work and discussions with subject leaders and teachers and with pupils about their learning.  Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour during lessons and at break and lunchtimes. Inspectors spoke to many pupils during the two days of the inspection.  The inspection focused on English, geography, science and food technology. All other subjects were considered as part of the inspection.

p.5

Inspection team

Bianka Zemke, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.5

Inspection team

Mike Onyon Ofsted Inspector 24–25 September 2019

p.5

6

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

6

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

6

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

6

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

6

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion