Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

St Mary's Church of England High School (VA)

Inspected 18 Sept 2019 · published 18 Oct 2019 · URN 138360

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    18 Sept 2019

  • Inspectors verified

    Brenda Watson, Dan Leonard, Diana Osagie, Georgina Atkinson, Gerard Batty

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    EN7 5FB

  • Name on report verified

    St Mary’s Church of England High School (VA)

  • URN verified

    138360

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−24Mixedmore positive than 8% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseconfidenteffectivelyambitioushigh-qualityhappysafesupportivesuccessful
Criticismweaknessesdo not knownot effectiveat riskpoornot alwaysdisruptionconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1278w−18
  • Safeguarding161w−50
  • What needs to improve31w—

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,434
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 56
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
15%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 66%Safeguarding 8%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 24%

Full report text

Inspection of St Mary’s Church of England High School (VA) Lieutenant Ellis Way, Cheshunt, Waltham Cross, Hertfordshire EN7 5FB

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Sixth-form provision Good Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good 17–18 September 2019

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils and sixth-form students feel happy and safe at school. Most pupils are confident, friendly and supportive to one another. They value being part of the school community.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils told us that they like to learn. They feel that many teachers manage pupils’ behaviour well and lessons are not usually disrupted. They say they learn lots in English. However, pupils say that they also have a few lessons a week which are not well taught or well managed. This can be made worse when teachers are absent and pupils do not behave well for temporary teachers. When this happens, pupils’ learning suffers.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils behave well at break and lunchtime. Some pupils’ behaviour in the corridors can be more boisterous as they move between lessons. This can be unpleasant for other pupils, particularly younger ones.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Most pupils say that bullying does not often happen. When it does happen, teachers and heads of year tackle it very quickly so that it stops. Pupils, parents and carers trust their pastoral team to take good care of them.

p.2

better?

Leaders are increasingly ambitious for pupils. There is a broad choice of subjects for pupils to study in Years 10 and 11. For example, leaders encourage pupils to study languages for as long as possible. Consequently, there is a high proportion of pupils who study GCSE languages.

p.2

better?

The school is working towards providing a high-quality education for all pupils. It already provides this in some subjects. In subjects such as English and languages, curriculum leaders and teachers plan carefully. There is a sharp focus on what pupils should learn as they move through the year groups so that they can be successful at each stage in their learning. However, in other subjects, such as mathematics and science, the planning and teaching are not of the same high quality. For example, planning in mathematics does not always follow a logical order. Teachers’ absence has also hindered the quality of what pupils access across a number of lessons. When teachers do not consider what pupils already know, the work is too easy for some pupils and too hard for others. This can lead to disruption in some lessons. These weaknesses in planning and teaching impact most negatively on disadvantaged pupils and the most able. As a result, these pupils are not achieving

p.2

better?

as well as they should in national examinations by the end of Year 11.

p.2

better?

Where the curriculum and teaching are stronger, pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are better supported to access the subject. Some of these pupils receive additional support in their literacy and numeracy. While this work is helping pupils to catch up in spelling and numeracy, they are not making the same strides in catching up in their reading. Leaders do not know enough about why 17–18 September 2019

p.2

3

Pupils are confident in their plans for the future. The school’s careers programme helps pupils to make appropriate choices about their next steps. Pupils access good- quality careers guidance about university, employment and training from early in their time at the school. All pupils meet employers from a range of local and national businesses.

p.3

3

Leaders are proactive in promoting pupils’ personal development. School time is set aside each week for pupils to reflect on personal qualities and what it is to be a good person. This is linked to a theme of the week, such as ‘courage’ or ‘what is takes to be a good friend’.

p.3

3

The school also offers a range of extra-curricular activities, such as sports clubs before school, at lunch and after school. Pupils from different year groups told us about the value of extra-curricular activities, such as auditioning to attend a debating competition at Broxbourne Council or winning public speaking competitions. Leaders continue to develop the range of trips and visits in the school so that they add more value to the curriculum on offer.

p.3

3

Sixth-form students are confident and mature young adults. They feel the school listens to any of their concerns. Students attend well but their punctuality is not as good. Almost all students complete their courses successfully. In the main school corridors, leaders celebrate the successes of former students, including the high proportion that go on to study at university. Sixth-form students achieve well in national examinations in a wide range of subjects and courses.

p.3

3

Over time, leaders and governors have not been rigorous enough in checking the school’s effectiveness. For example, they do not know enough about whether the additional funding they receive for disadvantaged pupils is making a real difference to these pupils. Leaders and governors do not know whether these pupils are accessing the curriculum as well as they could, including extra-curricular opportunities.

p.3

3

Some leaders do not have enough understanding about those pupils who access alternative provision. For example, inspectors were given an incomplete list of alternative providers that the school was using. Inspectors did not receive an accurate list until day two of the inspection.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

The school takes pupils’ welfare and safety seriously, making sure that there is a focus on protecting pupils from local risks. One deputy headteacher has developed expertise in working with pupils to avoid gang recruitment and knife crime. He takes a leading role in working with other Hertfordshire schools. 17–18 September 2019

p.3

4

All staff are trained to spot whether any pupil is becoming at risk as early as possible. Leaders then quickly find the right help from the many outside experts that they use. The school adds ‘wraparound’ support to their pupils for other local issues, such as domestic abuse and mental health issues. Leaders provide a range of services to pupils if they need it, such as counselling.

p.4

4

Despite weaknesses in leaders’ record-keeping regarding alternative provision, they do make appropriate checks on whether these schools and providers are suitable and they make regular checks that pupils are being kept safe when they are there.

p.4

(Information for the school and the appropriate authority)

 The curriculum in mathematics is less well developed than it is in English and languages. Leaders need to ensure that science teachers know how to adapt the curriculum so that the most able pupils make progress and acquire knowledge according to their ability. Mathematics and science have been impacted negatively by temporary teachers. Leaders have worked creatively to address these staffing issues. However, leaders now need to ensure that planning and teaching across subjects build logically across all lessons and year groups. Leaders need to make sure that pupils’ access to the curriculum is not inhibited by staff absence.  Teachers need training and guidance so that they adapt their planning to meet the needs of pupils in their lessons. This should particularly consider how to best support the most able and those from disadvantaged backgrounds to acquire knowledge over time that allows them to achieve well.

p.4

(Information for the school and the appropriate authority)

 Some lessons are disrupted by low-level poor behaviour. Leaders need to strengthen teachers’ behaviour management and pupils’ abilities to self-regulate their behaviour. This includes in corridors during lesson changeover.  The reading programme in key stage 3 is not yet fully effective in helping those pupils that need to catch up quickly. Leaders need to evaluate why the funding and additional school resource have not led to the planned progress. Governors need to monitor this work of leaders more effectively to ensure that pupils catch up in their reading, as they are in their spelling and numeracy.  The school’s funding to improve the participation and achievement of disadvantaged pupils is not effective. Leaders do not know enough about why this is not working well. Leaders and governors need to review the use of this funding. They need to consider more precisely how this is being used to ensure

p.4

(Information for the school and the appropriate authority)

that these pupils access the curriculum more effectively, including the wider opportunities being offered by the school. 17–18 September 2019

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.5

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.5

How can I feed back my views?

If you’re not happy with the inspection or the report, you can complain to Ofsted .

p.5

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.5

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 17–18 September 2019

p.5

School details

Inspection number 10110233 Type of school Secondary

p.6

provision

Number of pupils on the school roll 1,203

p.6

Information about this school

 St Mary’s is an average-sized secondary school.  The school is a Church of England school within the Diocese of St Albans.  The school uses three alternative providers: Hertford Regional College, Rivers Education Support Centre and Construction Training Partnership.

p.6

Information about this inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors met with the new headteacher, the designated safeguarding lead and the senior staff responsible for behaviour, staff training, pupils with SEND and disadvantaged pupils, and the business manager. The lead inspector met with the clerk to the governing body and held a telephone conversation with the director of education for the Diocese, who is also one of the four members of the 17–18 September 2019

p.6

7

academy.  We observed pupils at work and scrutinised the work in their books and folders. We spoke with pupils informally in classrooms and when walking around the school site. Inspectors also selected and met separately with four groups of eight pupils in Years 7, 10, 11 and 13.  We reviewed the school’s single central record and its records of vulnerable pupils. Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour during both structured and unstructured times. We reviewed feedback from the 46 parents who responded to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, and their 17 free-text responses. There were no responses to Ofsted’s questionnaires for pupils or staff.  The following subjects were considered as part of this inspection: English, mathematics, French, Spanish, science, personal, social, health and citizens education, art, drama, physical education and music.

p.7

Inspection team

Georgina Atkinson, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Brenda Watson Ofsted Inspector 17–18 September 2019

p.7

8

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion